Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Niklaus Pflugers letter to Bishop Williamson  (Read 22783 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fr. Niklaus Pflugers letter to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #105 on: April 22, 2013, 02:26:41 AM »
Fr Pfluger before yesterday thanked Hollingsworth for having published his letter to the bishop on the Internet ("Thank you to publish my letter to B. Williamson. That was the best to do.")

So let's top off and close the case by adding this e-mail introducing his German letter sent on 1 January 2011. With blurred e-mail addresses:


------------------ Forwarded message ------------------

From: "Abbé N. Pfluger" <XX@fsspx.org>
Date: 2011/1/1
Subject: Brief
To: Bishop Richard Williamson <YY@dinoscopus.org>

Exzellenz,

Ich hänge Ihnen meinen Brief an.
Bitte, seien Sie nicht wieder verletzt, sondern sehen Sie die Sorge um Sie!
Gottes Gnade und Licht im Neuen Jahr!

Ihr P. Niklaus Pfluger


---------------------------------------------------------

(My on-the-fly translation: )

Excellency,                              
                                         
I attach my letter to you.              
Please, don't be hurt again, but see the concern about you!          
God's grace and light in the New Year!                                      
                                         
Yours, Fr Niklaus Pfluger


Fr. Niklaus Pflugers letter to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #106 on: April 22, 2013, 04:25:35 AM »
Quote from: J.Paul

Regardless of whose name tag is present on the docuмent, let us not forget that this is a disgraceful letter.  It is filled with false and inaccurate historical references, it is a most unkind and vociferous screed which was nailed to the Bishop's door, and in its length and intensity, had to have been motivated by an intensely agitated and vengeful spirit.

Is this representative of what type of histories and behaviours which are being taught in European schools and seminaries of the SSPX?

Will this be the formation of the minds of future priests of the Society?

Will future Catholics be formed without a knowledge of the ravening wolf, the ancient enemy of Christ and His Church, to which this mental formation must pay homage and tribute, rather than to warn and denounce?

All around us true history and truth itself are being systematically replaced by the falsities of societal modernity, which are on display, front and center, in this scathing "letter".

Obviously, this is the mother's milk upon which both Father Pfluger and Maximillian Krah were raised. It is apparent that they have both internalized this way of being completely.
The question is, to whom will they pass this on?






I think this post by J.Paul has some important observations,

that should not be lost in the mix.  




This disgraceful letter is a most unkind and

vociferous screed, which, in its length and

intensity, had to have been motivated by an

intensely agitated and vengeful spirit.



Such would be the type of histories and

behaviours which are being taught in European

schools and seminaries of the SSPX, if this

reprehensible specimen is any indication!



Future Catholics would receive this mental

formation, which must pay homage and tribute to
 
the ravening wolf, the ancient enemy of Christ

and His Church, rather than learn to warn of its

existence and denounce it.



Would this ilk be representative of the formation

of the minds of future priests of the Society?








Fr. Niklaus Pflugers letter to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #107 on: April 22, 2013, 04:36:17 AM »
I don't claim any monopoly on persuasive language, but there
is something here that needs to be developed and placed into
the hands of those who would fund, provide, promote, encourage
and facilitate the seminary of young men who have a vocation to
the priesthood today.  

Short of that, it ought to be placed into the hands of those who
would become seminarians themselves.  

What a time to start training for the priesthood!  With all the
dangers to one's faith that are normally there in this abominable
age, now there is this new element hiding like a thief in the
night, in the very bosom of the Society that was so very
trustworthy just a decade or two ago.

This is what the Menzingen-denizens have accomplished.  This
has been their goal and desire, has it not?  Is this not what they
had intended to achieve?  If not, then they are FAILURES even
by way of their own incompetence.


Fr. Niklaus Pflugers letter to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #108 on: April 22, 2013, 09:32:38 PM »
Hollingsworth,
Quote
Can we be absolutely certain that MK28 actually composed the letter?  No, we can't.  But I think at this point we can intelligently surmise that MK28 had major input regarding its contents.


It is an important factor if Herr Krah either authored of co-authored this letter, but what is most important is its content.
The venom in it is more understandable if he was involved, however if it was indeed the sole effort of Father Pfluger  it quite clearly indicates both the ignorance and the malice of its creator. And as it seems that he was quite content to send it which is disturbing in itself.

I surmise that he might actually think that this was a good thing to do, which then raises the question of a moral nature.

This should not be let go or allowed to fade as it is a window into the mindset which prevails in Menzingen. We know that Bishop Fellay also holds similar socially conditioned views and opinions.

It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall in a German SSPX school and again in a seminary to see if the students and seminarians are being conditioned with the same dogmas of modernity, and also to examine the texts which are used in these places.

Fr. Niklaus Pflugers letter to Bishop Williamson
« Reply #109 on: April 23, 2013, 02:03:59 AM »
Quote from: J.Paul
It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall in a German SSPX school and again in a seminary to see if the students and seminarians are being conditioned with the same dogmas of modernity, and also to examine the texts which are used in these places.

Short answer: they are.