Author Topic: Fr. Niklaus Pflugers letter to Bishop Williamson (Read 22885 times)

Quo Vadis Petre · « **Reply #60 on:** April 17, 2013, 02:25:04 PM »

Ethelred didn't say simply that. He said this:

Quote

This means that Krah created this letter in the first instance on his computer (or in his user-account on a SSPX computer), because MS-Word uses this user-name as creator tag when you create a new Word docuмent.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #61 on:** April 17, 2013, 02:30:24 PM »

Vinny:

Quote

I am not debating that. Your premise is that it sounds just like Krah and the original posting in this thread is that the "smoking gun" had been discovered buried in the header of this docuмent that absolutely linked it to Krah. And I am telling you that the "smoking gun" evidence was fabricated - that's all, just stating a fact.

So let's summarize, Vinny. You're saying that the letter to Bp. W is authentic enough. It is not a fabrication. It was authored by 1st Asst. Fr. Pfluger in German, and sent to the bishop around Dec. 27, 2010. You have no problem accepting that. Where you hang up is at the point where it is alleged that there was coorperation between MK and Pfluger in the preparation of the letter. You're disputing the 'MK28' tag "buried in the header of this docuмent," which absolutely links it to Krah. That's frabricated evidence, you say. That alleged link does not hold up under closer scrutiny, you say. But the letter itself is the real deal. It was written and sent by Fr. Pfluger. But there is no proof that Krah collaborated in the writing of it. Right?

VinnyF · « **Reply #62 on:** April 17, 2013, 02:33:43 PM »

Quote from: John Grace

It's pointless engaging with VinnyF. To the likes of him, facts are internet rumour. All I will do for him is pray for him.

John,

As I said before, I have not disputed any facts in this thread, except for the "fact" that there is proof that this letter came from Krah's computer.

I am sure you understand, or perhaps you do not, that there are certainly people in SSPX chapels who are trying to put everything together to discern how to deal with this situation. I speaking from first hand experience of someone who has spent much time with Frs. Hewko, Pfeiffer, and Voigt and maintain contact with them.

When it becomes evident that one is creating false evidence to back up your theories and opinions, it makes your position less credible to those "on the bubble", so to speak.

I do appreciate your prayers, BTW.

Quo Vadis Petre · « **Reply #63 on:** April 17, 2013, 02:39:10 PM »

:rolleyes: Go on that irrelevant tangent, VinnyF, as Ethelred stated "on his computer or on his user-account on an SSPX computer."

John Grace · « **Reply #64 on:** April 17, 2013, 02:39:37 PM »

VinnyF

Quote

When it becomes evident that one is creating false evidence to back up your theories and opinions, it makes your position less credible to those "on the bubble", so to speak.

Can you expand on what you mean? Who is the "your" and what are the theories and opinions? And as you direct this to me, state where I said Krah wrote this?