Quote from: LAMB

This seems to be an unfair type of censorship.

No, it's perfectly fair. It applies to every member, on both ends (giving and receiving). Even I am not allowed to be more than 17% of someone's downvotes.

Meanwhile, on the other end, every single person on the forum is thus "protected" by limiting enemy damage. There are no exceptions.

It prevents bullying, and excessive "rep" damage from one or two arch-enemies. Everyone has enemies, including Our Lord. So it's a wise system.

The system really works -- truly bad posts/members can get lots of downvotes, because LOTS OF PEOPLE participate in the downvoting. But when it's only 2-3 people, the person isn't objectively that bad, and it's good for the system to limit how much negative rep a single person can inflict.

I could very well get kicked off of CI for saying this, but truth is truth.

We ruthlessly excoriate the NO bishops who constantly shuffle around the predator priests and thereby enable future predations.

There's a disturbing trend here with the SSPX, and yet nobody really wants to talk about it.

Father Urrutigoity was accused of such behavior by the SSPX's own rector at La Reja.  Yet not only did Father U gain admittance into Winona, but he was protected and even promoted there almost as if he were the right-hand man of the rector.  He was allowed to build up a cult following there, an inner circle, despite +Lefebvre asking that he be watched like a hawk, especially if he tried to form "particular friendships".

Now we see Father Roberts.  When I was at Winona, the rumor was already there at the seminary about why he had gotten kicked out of ICK.  Yet he found a new home at Winona also.

Both Urrutigoity and Roberts were ordained despite these clouds hanging over them.  As far as I can tell, they must have had their protectors within the SSPX.

Something stinks within the ranks of the SSPX.  I suspect infiltration by the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs (as well as, most likely, various modernist plants).

Now one guy was kicked out while I was there because his mannerisms were "offensively effeminate" (the exact words used by Bishop Williamson upon letting him go).  But perhaps he had not found any protectors as of yet (he had only been there a week or so).

I could very well get kicked off of CI for saying this, but truth is truth.

We ruthlessly excoriate the NO bishops who constantly shuffle around the predator priests and thereby enable future predations.

There's a disturbing trend here with the SSPX, and yet nobody really wants to talk about it.

Father Urrutigoity was accused of such behavior by the SSPX's own rector at La Reja.  Yet not only did Father U gain admittance into Winona, but he was protected and even promoted there almost as if he were the right-hand man of the rector.  He was allowed to build up a cult following there, an inner circle, despite +Lefebvre asking that he be watched like a hawk, especially if he tried to form "particular friendships".

Now we see Father Roberts.  When I was at Winona, the rumor was already there at the seminary about why he had gotten kicked out of ICK.  Yet he found a new home at Winona also.

Both Urrutigoity and Roberts were ordained despite these clouds hanging over them.  As far as I can tell, they must have had their protectors within the SSPX.

Something stinks within the ranks of the SSPX.  I suspect infiltration by the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs (as well as, most likely, various modernist plants).

Now one guy was kicked out while I was there because his mannerisms were "offensively effeminate" (the exact words used by Bishop Williamson upon letting him go).  But perhaps he had not found any protectors as of yet (he had only been there a week or so).

Quote from: Ladislaus

I could very well get kicked off of CI for saying this, but truth is truth.

We ruthlessly excoriate the NO bishops who constantly shuffle around the predator priests and thereby enable future predations.

There's a disturbing trend here with the SSPX, and yet nobody really wants to talk about it.

Father Urrutigoity was accused of such behavior by the SSPX's own rector at La Reja.  Yet not only did Father U gain admittance into Winona, but he was protected and even promoted there almost as if he were the right-hand man of the rector.  He was allowed to build up a cult following there, an inner circle, despite +Lefebvre asking that he be watched like a hawk, especially if he tried to form "particular friendships".

Now we see Father Roberts.  When I was at Winona, the rumor was already there at the seminary about why he had gotten kicked out of ICK.  Yet he found a new home at Winona also.

Both Urrutigoity and Roberts were ordained despite these clouds hanging over them.  As far as I can tell, they must have had their protectors within the SSPX.

Something stinks within the ranks of the SSPX.  I suspect infiltration by the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs (as well as, most likely, various modernist plants).

Now one guy was kicked out while I was there because his mannerisms were "offensively effeminate" (the exact words used by Bishop Williamson upon letting him go).  But perhaps he had not found any protectors as of yet (he had only been there a week or so).

I think that you need to look a little closer to home Ladislaus. Who was the rector in Winona at the time of Urrutigoity and Roberts? Who welcomed Urrutigoity into Winona in the first place, despite the pleadings of the rector of La Reja, Fr. Morello, who had kicked him out for predatorial homo behaviour?

It is a fact that a Resistance priest was sent to Ireland in January 2015, to a family of 11, to say Mass on a monthly basis, who had been permanently deprived of his public ministry by the SSPX, because of 2 separate homo predatorial allegations. the second incident involving a 14 year old French boy. This priest was sent to Ireland from Queen of Martyrs House in Broadstairs by his current superior, who did not see fit to inform the said family and when they were informed by a member of the Faithful in March, this priest agreed not to return to Ireland again. This priest still has a public ministry in the UK, with the full approval of his superior, who has put his approval in writing.

Quote from: richard

Quote from: LAMB

Quote from: Ladislaus

I could very well get kicked off of CI for saying this, but truth is truth.

We ruthlessly excoriate the NO bishops who constantly shuffle around the predator priests and thereby enable future predations.

There's a disturbing trend here with the SSPX, and yet nobody really wants to talk about it.

Father Urrutigoity was accused of such behavior by the SSPX's own rector at La Reja.  Yet not only did Father U gain admittance into Winona, but he was protected and even promoted there almost as if he were the right-hand man of the rector.  He was allowed to build up a cult following there, an inner circle, despite +Lefebvre asking that he be watched like a hawk, especially if he tried to form "particular friendships".

Now we see Father Roberts.  When I was at Winona, the rumor was already there at the seminary about why he had gotten kicked out of ICK.  Yet he found a new home at Winona also.

Both Urrutigoity and Roberts were ordained despite these clouds hanging over them.  As far as I can tell, they must have had their protectors within the SSPX.

Something stinks within the ranks of the SSPX.  I suspect infiltration by the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs (as well as, most likely, various modernist plants).

Now one guy was kicked out while I was there because his mannerisms were "offensively effeminate" (the exact words used by Bishop Williamson upon letting him go).  But perhaps he had not found any protectors as of yet (he had only been there a week or so).

I think that you need to look a little closer to home Ladislaus. Who was the rector in Winona at the time of Urrutigoity and Roberts? Who welcomed Urrutigoity into Winona in the first place, despite the pleadings of the rector of La Reja, Fr. Morello, who had kicked him out for predatorial homo behaviour?

It is a fact that a Resistance priest was sent to Ireland in January 2015, to a family of 11, to say Mass on a monthly basis, who had been permanently deprived of his public ministry by the SSPX, because of 2 separate homo predatorial allegations. the second incident involving a 14 year old French boy. This priest was sent to Ireland from Queen of Martyrs House in Broadstairs by his current superior, who did not see fit to inform the said family and when they were informed by a member of the Faithful in March, this priest agreed not to return to Ireland again. This priest still has a public ministry in the UK, with the full approval of his superior, who has put his approval in writing.

So now we have it, the real purpose of all this garbage was really the destruction of Bp.Williamson.

Ladislaus writes: When I was at Winona, the rumor was already there at the seminary about why he had gotten kicked out of ICK. RUMOR? RUMOR! not Facts but RUMOR! amazing.I need a little help here just what is a RUMORanyway?

Moving on to the little lamb who writes:It is a fact that a Resistance priest was sent to Ireland in January 2015, to a family of 11, to say Mass on a monthly basis, who had been permanently deprived of his public ministry by the SSPX, because of 2 separate homo predatorial allegations. Does this priest have a name,and while we are at it do you have a name?We all know who the alleged superior is so without having to give factual evidence(the priest's name) you can quite easily destroy the superior's reputation. Why would you do this? Oh I know the resistance has a new Bishop so you no longer need Bp.Williamson,pretty slick,not bad for a little lamb.

What an angry old troll you are Little Richard!   :argue:    Did I touch a raw nerve or something?  :dwarf:  

As Ladislaus said above " truth is truth."  And  Ladislaus writes: When I was at Winona, the rumor was already there at the seminary about why he had gotten kicked out of ICK.   But, the thing is, it wasn't a RUMOR at all, it was actually 100% true, as evidenced by the Rector of ICK at the time, Mons. Patrick Perez! Put THAT in yer pipe n smoke it! And quit being so abusive to other posters on this forum - whatever charm school you went to, you should get your money back!

Oh, btw, a BIG THUMBS DOWN while we're at it!

Quote from: richard

Now we see Father Roberts.  When I was at Winona, the rumor was already there at the seminary about why he had gotten kicked out of ICK.  Yet he found a new home at Winona also.

Rumor at the time, but later substantiated by credible witnesses.