Author Topic: Fr Marshall Roberts with the Resistance (Read 30867 times)

claudel · « **Reply #25 on:** May 14, 2015, 10:05:21 PM »

Quote from: claudel

… The Search function is virtually useless as now configured. …

My apologies for carelessly omitting two important words. What I meant to write was this: The home page's Search function is virtually useless as now configured. The internal Search function, however, works just fine. I see little evidence, however, that more than a handful of folks ever use it.

Franciscan Solitary · « **Reply #26 on:** May 15, 2015, 12:49:55 AM »

The anonymous "Pepe" is acting the part of the classic Jansenist agitator. The Jansenists work to undermine the Church first so that the Modernists can raze it to the ground later. It's a "good cop"/"bad cop" routine. This same dishonest gimmick has been used against the Catholics since time immemorial and Catholics shouldn't fall for it. Those like "Pepe" routinely make the same accusations against Bishop Williamson and there is no end to their Puritan hypocrisy: Once they have turned Catholics against the contemporary lawful hierarchy then they find fault with Pius XII, then St. Pius X, then the Popes since the Renaissance, then since the Greek schism, and on and on. Soon not even St Peter is good enough for the holier-than-thou Jansenist saboteurs. The French have a name for them: Tartuffe.

Make no mistake. These Puritan hypocrites are far more worldly than the Catholics they love to falsely accuse. It is they who would slyly introduce scandalous impurity into the Roman clergy -- if they can. This has been their repeated track-record since the Donatist heretics in Ancient North Africa.

The ladies on this thread who are absolutely right to react with horror to this accusation should understand that it has always been the likes of "Pepe" who have time and again gleefully introduced (through millennia!) the horrors they deceitfully denounce in others. Martin Luther himself was such a villain, although Lutheran hypocrisy is more openly violent and the Jansenist variety that "Pepe" practices is more sly and oily.

It is the anonymous "Pepe" who should be suspected of immoral intentions here, not the brave and intrepid Fr. Roberts. To accuse a holy Catholic priest ordained by Bishop Williamson, and who is also a close friend of priests such as Fr. Pfeiffer, of such abominations ought to alert Catholics that no good is afoot. Fr. Roberts has been cleared of all such innuendos years ago by the legitimate authorities of the Roman Catholic Church. "Pepe" is an unnamed journalist blogger with no sacramental or divine authority whatsoever. "Pepe" has already clearly shown himself to be a Jansenist hypocrite wolf in sheep's clothing by his own scandalous anti-Catholic calumny.

Fr. Roberts is innocent. The heretic "Pepe" is guilty! In a better and more just world it would be the oily character assassins like "Pepe" who would be accused, lawfully tried for their heresy and then cast into the truly purifying flames of our most Holy Inquisition. May the lasting security and happiness that would result from such true and just punishment of heretic perversion come quickly.

Maranatha!

Pilar · « **Reply #27 on:** May 15, 2015, 03:29:24 AM »

Well, as my better half said on reading the information here, there are too many things he is accused of to be ignored. And I would never think Fr. Perez was lying (about the letter). I thought about it long and hard and I prayed about it too. He may be doing the work of a holy priest, but same sex attraction does not change, and so I hope he is never working with boys or seminarians. God forbid. I will be praying for him.

JPaul · « **Reply #28 on:** May 15, 2015, 07:51:03 AM »

We have been through this SSJ group's behaviour a number of times in the past, and it is not profitable to resurrect it again except to say that this is another demonstration of the ineptness of the SSPX resistance so called.
They will not limit their members to those who are of proven character and who will not engender controversies such as this and others which have happened.

One has to seriously think if he wants to entrust his spiritual well being to an SSPX which has crossed over into the worldly pasture of modernism, or a so called resistance which is stumbling from one morally questionable crisis to the next.

I think that Matthew might want to consider zapping this thread. It is reflecting badly upon too many people, as well as exposing the unknowing to sordid things that disrupt their spiritual peace.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #29 on:** May 15, 2015, 09:24:24 AM »

Good and devout human beings may easily make horrible mistakes about whom to trust. Good Catholics are duty-bound to think the very best of others. Wolves in sheep's clothing are by nature engaging and disarming, and from my observations, they always travel with a "posse" of people who help maintain the power structure. The helpers are alert to anyone who will not go along, and are poised to ruin anyone who poses a threat.

Traditional Catholics are not magically immune to the possibility of grave sin touching our lives. The Church hijacked by Modernists has been a perfect opportunity for a few gravely disordered clergy and laypeople to work under the guise of restoration of the practice of the True Faith. Without being paranoid and secretive, we just need to try to maintain a balance of mercy and a healthy guard. It only reflects badly on us if we delude ourselves into thinking we are superior, and become tempted to hide problems rather than fix them.