Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?  (Read 57461 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
« Reply #50 on: February 15, 2019, 01:33:39 PM »
FIRST LINE of the "Factual Statement" is already false --


Isn't that a textbook case of "begging the question"?

The whole lawsuit reads like this, too -- he just states things as if saying it makes it so.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike's lawsuit for defamation
vs.
John

Summary: John says I am a crook. He is maliciously defaming me.

Evidence/FACTS:
1. I am an honest man.
2. I am not a crook.
...
-------------------------------------------------------------------

How can you just say that and hope to consider it an indisputable fact? Facts are supposed to be simple, concrete, verifiable, provable.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
« Reply #51 on: February 15, 2019, 01:38:14 PM »
Mr. John Pfeiffer's lawyer (which might have been himself, since he is a lawyer) must have had a field day with this one.

All he'd need to do is show evidence, on the Internet and elsewhere, that suggests Fr. Roberts was not a "respected clergyman" as of dates that precede whatever statements John Pfeiffer made (specific exhibits that Fr. Roberts put forward as evidence against him).


Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
« Reply #52 on: February 15, 2019, 09:49:40 PM »
The reason for writing this pertains to victims and police reports from Colorado on Ambrose Moran. These police investigations which “The Recusant” study covers briefly in a well-written report about Ambrose Moran, is only a short synopsis of the actual lengthy investigations which are available and include many interviews of many victims and are presented in reliably docuмented records from the Salida, Colorado police department and also docuмents from the Buena Vista, Colorado police department.

It is important for proper discernment to read these police reports in order to evaluate the morally grave as well as criminally grave activities revealed; and they also reveal that the victims of Ambrose Moran are many.  Let us now add to the list of attempted victims, those of the Resistance who fought for the truth and were maligned, condemned, and falsely “excommunicated”; in addition, there are those who could   suffer greatly while attempting to figure things out in the context of all the diabolical disorientation of Ambrose Moran and those others with an agenda who offer chaos and confusion and use bullying tactics for the purpose of controlling the Resistance fighters.  The truth is being purposely undermined by hiding it from view.

The police reports are of fraud, the conning of many victims, and they also include disturbing accounts from teenagers who said that Ambrose Moran provided them with underage and illegal drinking and also attempted to coerce them to come to his place of residence to drink wine and stay the night, etc. These teenagers express their thoughts on the motives according to their experiences.  Although only God knows what A. Moran had in mind for these teenagers, nevertheless, the truth remains that Ambrose Moran could possibly continue to victimize others unless attempts are made to thwart him by allowing others to view police reports which provide clear evidence of his method of operation.  A cover up would be another grievous scandal. It is very important that the TRUTH about A. Moran NOT BE COVERED UP.

The Vatican II conciliar church victims multiplied and increased greatly because of the cover ups by those who could have stopped other victims from being harmed and from ruined lives.  Many victims went on to live seriously destructive lives with addictions and much worse such as loss of Faith, ѕυιcιdєs, etc.

We have spoken to Father Hewko asking him to alert Christa Richards and her husband and to inform them about these police reports so that they will be able to protect their two sons from A. Moran.  The mother, Christa Richards, disclosed on “The Catacombs” that they rent a place to Ambrose Moran in Ohio and also entrust their sons to the care of Ambrose Moran for catechizing and so forth.

Future victims of A. Moran could be averted when the TRUTH is UNMASKED and made available for others in order to protect them.

Father Hewko told us that Father Pfeiffer’s contention is that A. Moran was not convicted of any of the crimes that are on these docuмents of the Colorado police reports.  This contention is absurd because it amounts to a cover up if it is not made known in order to alert others of the dangers for their children and themselves.

There are so many crimes and evils that have been committed in the anti-church of our times for which the criminals have not been convicted, but have been allowed to go on their way to commit more crimes, more evil, and more harm to souls.  Were the lessons of the shameful cover ups within the anti-church of our times not lessons enough as how to proceed with right reason and right judgement and therefore expose predatory criminals to the light in order to protect victims?  

To explain away the duty of those in the Resistance who can halt Ambrose Moran from victimizing others, as if it is committing the sin of detraction, gossip, calumny or otherwise is an unworthy pretense and grave error that is straight from hell.

We are our brother’s keeper.
Please post links for these police reports.  I would like to read them.  Thank you.

Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
« Reply #53 on: February 15, 2019, 09:50:39 PM »
Apparently there was some legal action in March 2018. Not sure if it is still ongoing.

But this is obviously public record, so it can be posted anywhere and everywhere.

Fr. Marshall Roberts
vs.
Mr. John Pfeiffer

In my opinion, I have SERIOUS doubts that Mr. Pfeiffer (a lawyer, I believe) would just, out of malice, make up all these things about Fr. Roberts. Why would he have such an axe to grind against a Trad priest. What, did Fr. Roberts run over his child, or at least his dog? What motive does Fr. Roberts suggest for Mr. Pfeiffer making all this up? I suppose something along the lines of, "He's pure evil, a child of the devil"? Give me a break! Let's be realistic here.

And it's not like Fr. Roberts had a reputation beyond reproach before Mr. John Pfeiffer came along. It's a fact that Fr. Roberts was with the Society of St. John, and a lot of scandals happened in that group. A lot of which is public record. AT LEAST there should be a cloud of suspicion over Fr. Roberts.
This was begun by pablo, using olmc benefactor money. 

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
« Reply #54 on: February 15, 2019, 09:54:25 PM »
This was begun by pablo, using olmc benefactor money.
And you wonder what motivates me to wake people up to the evils of the Pfeiffer cult... the more people I can wake up, the less resources he will have for evil deeds like this (legal attacks on an innocent man).
I hate to see good Catholics get duped into donating their money to a bad cause. They imagine their offering going right into God's hands, but in reality it ends up in satan's hands instead, and is quickly put to evil uses. Sick!