Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?  (Read 15297 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31174
  • Reputation: +27088/-494
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
« Reply #45 on: February 15, 2019, 08:17:27 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well said.

    Also, it should be pointed out that it can be sinful NOT to publicly mention things like this.

    The public good demands that issues like this be made public. We are not to be scrupulous and keep quiet about grave public sins affecting the good of souls. Any future would-be parishioners need to know the accusations and any public record about Fr. Roberts.

    Think of it this way: if one is silent about a grave scandal and in the future some soul is harmed (perhaps a child?), that individual would be partly responsible.


    There is a time when silence is sinful. This is one of those times.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline brothers keeper

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 6
    • Reputation: +13/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #46 on: February 15, 2019, 08:52:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The reason for writing this pertains to victims and police reports from Colorado on Ambrose Moran. These police investigations which “The Recusant” study covers briefly in a well-written report about Ambrose Moran, is only a short synopsis of the actual lengthy investigations which are available and include many interviews of many victims and are presented in reliably docuмented records from the Salida, Colorado police department and also docuмents from the Buena Vista, Colorado police department.

    It is important for proper discernment to read these police reports in order to evaluate the morally grave as well as criminally grave activities revealed; and they also reveal that the victims of Ambrose Moran are many.  Let us now add to the list of attempted victims, those of the Resistance who fought for the truth and were maligned, condemned, and falsely “excommunicated”; in addition, there are those who could   suffer greatly while attempting to figure things out in the context of all the diabolical disorientation of Ambrose Moran and those others with an agenda who offer chaos and confusion and use bullying tactics for the purpose of controlling the Resistance fighters.  The truth is being purposely undermined by hiding it from view.

    The police reports are of fraud, the conning of many victims, and they also include disturbing accounts from teenagers who said that Ambrose Moran provided them with underage and illegal drinking and also attempted to coerce them to come to his place of residence to drink wine and stay the night, etc. These teenagers express their thoughts on the motives according to their experiences.  Although only God knows what A. Moran had in mind for these teenagers, nevertheless, the truth remains that Ambrose Moran could possibly continue to victimize others unless attempts are made to thwart him by allowing others to view police reports which provide clear evidence of his method of operation.  A cover up would be another grievous scandal. It is very important that the TRUTH about A. Moran NOT BE COVERED UP.

    The Vatican II conciliar church victims multiplied and increased greatly because of the cover ups by those who could have stopped other victims from being harmed and from ruined lives.  Many victims went on to live seriously destructive lives with addictions and much worse such as loss of Faith, ѕυιcιdєs, etc.

    We have spoken to Father Hewko asking him to alert Christa Richards and her husband and to inform them about these police reports so that they will be able to protect their two sons from A. Moran.  The mother, Christa Richards, disclosed on “The Catacombs” that they rent a place to Ambrose Moran in Ohio and also entrust their sons to the care of Ambrose Moran for catechizing and so forth.
     
    Future victims of A. Moran could be averted when the TRUTH is UNMASKED and made available for others in order to protect them.

    Father Hewko told us that Father Pfeiffer’s contention is that A. Moran was not convicted of any of the crimes that are on these docuмents of the Colorado police reports.  This contention is absurd because it amounts to a cover up if it is not made known in order to alert others of the dangers for their children and themselves.

    There are so many crimes and evils that have been committed in the anti-church of our times for which the criminals have not been convicted, but have been allowed to go on their way to commit more crimes, more evil, and more harm to souls.  Were the lessons of the shameful cover ups within the anti-church of our times not lessons enough as how to proceed with right reason and right judgement and therefore expose predatory criminals to the light in order to protect victims?  

    To explain away the duty of those in the Resistance who can halt Ambrose Moran from victimizing others, as if it is committing the sin of detraction, gossip, calumny or otherwise is an unworthy pretense and grave error that is straight from hell.

    We are our brother’s keeper.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41846
    • Reputation: +23909/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #47 on: February 15, 2019, 09:19:29 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • To be accurate, he was expelled from ICK, and it was in the late 80s ... but the most important thing, the reason he was expelled, is correct as stated.  I entered STAS in 1989, and he had already been there for some time after his explusion.

    As with others who ended up at STAS, their version of events is that they were set up or expelled because they were too conservative.  There was another chap there, now an ordained priest, who had been expelled for failing a psychological evaluation, and his claim was that it was, again, a pretext for getting rid of him for being too conservative.  I got to know the gentleman, and I had to say there were legitimate psychological concerns.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31174
    • Reputation: +27088/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #48 on: February 15, 2019, 11:44:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Apparently there was some legal action in March 2018. Not sure if it is still ongoing.

    But this is obviously public record, so it can be posted anywhere and everywhere.

    Fr. Marshall Roberts
    vs.
    Mr. John Pfeiffer

    In my opinion, I have SERIOUS doubts that Mr. Pfeiffer (a lawyer, I believe) would just, out of malice, make up all these things about Fr. Roberts. Why would he have such an axe to grind against a Trad priest. What, did Fr. Roberts run over his child, or at least his dog? What motive does Fr. Roberts suggest for Mr. Pfeiffer making all this up? I suppose something along the lines of, "He's pure evil, a child of the devil"? Give me a break! Let's be realistic here.

    And it's not like Fr. Roberts had a reputation beyond reproach before Mr. John Pfeiffer came along. It's a fact that Fr. Roberts was with the Society of St. John, and a lot of scandals happened in that group. A lot of which is public record. AT LEAST there should be a cloud of suspicion over Fr. Roberts.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41846
    • Reputation: +23909/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #49 on: February 15, 2019, 12:29:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Apparently there was some legal action in March 2018. Not sure if it is still ongoing.

    But this is obviously public record, so it can be posted anywhere and everywhere.

    Fr. Marshall Roberts
    vs.
    Mr. John Pfeiffer

    In my opinion, I have SERIOUS doubts that Mr. Pfeiffer (a lawyer, I believe) would just, out of malice, make up all these things about Fr. Roberts. Why would he have such an axe to grind against a Trad priest. What, did Fr. Roberts run over his child, or at least his dog? What motive does Fr. Roberts suggest for Mr. Pfeiffer making all this up? I suppose something along the lines of, "He's pure evil, a child of the devil"? Give me a break! Let's be realistic here.

    And it's not like Fr. Roberts had a reputation beyond reproach before Mr. John Pfeiffer came along. It's a fact that Fr. Roberts was with the Society of St. John, and a lot of scandals happened in that group. A lot of which is public record. AT LEAST there should be a cloud of suspicion over Fr. Roberts.

    FIRST LINE of the "Factual Statement" is already false --

    Quote
    Father Roberts is a well-respected clergyman.



    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31174
    • Reputation: +27088/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #50 on: February 15, 2019, 01:33:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • FIRST LINE of the "Factual Statement" is already false --


    Isn't that a textbook case of "begging the question"?

    The whole lawsuit reads like this, too -- he just states things as if saying it makes it so.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mike's lawsuit for defamation
    vs.
    John

    Summary: John says I am a crook. He is maliciously defaming me.

    Evidence/FACTS:
    1. I am an honest man.
    2. I am not a crook.
    ...
    -------------------------------------------------------------------

    How can you just say that and hope to consider it an indisputable fact? Facts are supposed to be simple, concrete, verifiable, provable.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31174
    • Reputation: +27088/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #51 on: February 15, 2019, 01:38:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Mr. John Pfeiffer's lawyer (which might have been himself, since he is a lawyer) must have had a field day with this one.

    All he'd need to do is show evidence, on the Internet and elsewhere, that suggests Fr. Roberts was not a "respected clergyman" as of dates that precede whatever statements John Pfeiffer made (specific exhibits that Fr. Roberts put forward as evidence against him).
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline St Paul

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 151
    • Reputation: +144/-63
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #52 on: February 15, 2019, 09:49:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The reason for writing this pertains to victims and police reports from Colorado on Ambrose Moran. These police investigations which “The Recusant” study covers briefly in a well-written report about Ambrose Moran, is only a short synopsis of the actual lengthy investigations which are available and include many interviews of many victims and are presented in reliably docuмented records from the Salida, Colorado police department and also docuмents from the Buena Vista, Colorado police department.

    It is important for proper discernment to read these police reports in order to evaluate the morally grave as well as criminally grave activities revealed; and they also reveal that the victims of Ambrose Moran are many.  Let us now add to the list of attempted victims, those of the Resistance who fought for the truth and were maligned, condemned, and falsely “excommunicated”; in addition, there are those who could   suffer greatly while attempting to figure things out in the context of all the diabolical disorientation of Ambrose Moran and those others with an agenda who offer chaos and confusion and use bullying tactics for the purpose of controlling the Resistance fighters.  The truth is being purposely undermined by hiding it from view.

    The police reports are of fraud, the conning of many victims, and they also include disturbing accounts from teenagers who said that Ambrose Moran provided them with underage and illegal drinking and also attempted to coerce them to come to his place of residence to drink wine and stay the night, etc. These teenagers express their thoughts on the motives according to their experiences.  Although only God knows what A. Moran had in mind for these teenagers, nevertheless, the truth remains that Ambrose Moran could possibly continue to victimize others unless attempts are made to thwart him by allowing others to view police reports which provide clear evidence of his method of operation.  A cover up would be another grievous scandal. It is very important that the TRUTH about A. Moran NOT BE COVERED UP.

    The Vatican II conciliar church victims multiplied and increased greatly because of the cover ups by those who could have stopped other victims from being harmed and from ruined lives.  Many victims went on to live seriously destructive lives with addictions and much worse such as loss of Faith, ѕυιcιdєs, etc.

    We have spoken to Father Hewko asking him to alert Christa Richards and her husband and to inform them about these police reports so that they will be able to protect their two sons from A. Moran.  The mother, Christa Richards, disclosed on “The Catacombs” that they rent a place to Ambrose Moran in Ohio and also entrust their sons to the care of Ambrose Moran for catechizing and so forth.

    Future victims of A. Moran could be averted when the TRUTH is UNMASKED and made available for others in order to protect them.

    Father Hewko told us that Father Pfeiffer’s contention is that A. Moran was not convicted of any of the crimes that are on these docuмents of the Colorado police reports.  This contention is absurd because it amounts to a cover up if it is not made known in order to alert others of the dangers for their children and themselves.

    There are so many crimes and evils that have been committed in the anti-church of our times for which the criminals have not been convicted, but have been allowed to go on their way to commit more crimes, more evil, and more harm to souls.  Were the lessons of the shameful cover ups within the anti-church of our times not lessons enough as how to proceed with right reason and right judgement and therefore expose predatory criminals to the light in order to protect victims?  

    To explain away the duty of those in the Resistance who can halt Ambrose Moran from victimizing others, as if it is committing the sin of detraction, gossip, calumny or otherwise is an unworthy pretense and grave error that is straight from hell.

    We are our brother’s keeper.
    Please post links for these police reports.  I would like to read them.  Thank you.


    Offline St Paul

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 151
    • Reputation: +144/-63
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #53 on: February 15, 2019, 09:50:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Apparently there was some legal action in March 2018. Not sure if it is still ongoing.

    But this is obviously public record, so it can be posted anywhere and everywhere.

    Fr. Marshall Roberts
    vs.
    Mr. John Pfeiffer

    In my opinion, I have SERIOUS doubts that Mr. Pfeiffer (a lawyer, I believe) would just, out of malice, make up all these things about Fr. Roberts. Why would he have such an axe to grind against a Trad priest. What, did Fr. Roberts run over his child, or at least his dog? What motive does Fr. Roberts suggest for Mr. Pfeiffer making all this up? I suppose something along the lines of, "He's pure evil, a child of the devil"? Give me a break! Let's be realistic here.

    And it's not like Fr. Roberts had a reputation beyond reproach before Mr. John Pfeiffer came along. It's a fact that Fr. Roberts was with the Society of St. John, and a lot of scandals happened in that group. A lot of which is public record. AT LEAST there should be a cloud of suspicion over Fr. Roberts.
    This was begun by pablo, using olmc benefactor money. 

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31174
    • Reputation: +27088/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #54 on: February 15, 2019, 09:54:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This was begun by pablo, using olmc benefactor money.
    And you wonder what motivates me to wake people up to the evils of the Pfeiffer cult... the more people I can wake up, the less resources he will have for evil deeds like this (legal attacks on an innocent man).
    I hate to see good Catholics get duped into donating their money to a bad cause. They imagine their offering going right into God's hands, but in reality it ends up in satan's hands instead, and is quickly put to evil uses. Sick!
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #55 on: February 18, 2019, 04:51:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Apparently there was some legal action in March 2018. Not sure if it is still ongoing.

    But this is obviously public record, so it can be posted anywhere and everywhere.

    Fr. Marshall Roberts
    vs.
    Mr. John Pfeiffer

    In my opinion, I have SERIOUS doubts that Mr. Pfeiffer (a lawyer, I believe) would just, out of malice, make up all these things about Fr. Roberts. Why would he have such an axe to grind against a Trad priest. What, did Fr. Roberts run over his child, or at least his dog? What motive does Fr. Roberts suggest for Mr. Pfeiffer making all this up? I suppose something along the lines of, "He's pure evil, a child of the devil"? Give me a break! Let's be realistic here.

    And it's not like Fr. Roberts had a reputation beyond reproach before Mr. John Pfeiffer came along. It's a fact that Fr. Roberts was with the Society of St. John, and a lot of scandals happened in that group. A lot of which is public record. AT LEAST there should be a cloud of suspicion over Fr. Roberts.

    One can only imagine how much in legal fees and costs have already been generated over the last year with apparently no end in sight.

    Update on case filed on 3-6-2018


    Case Information Summary for Case Number
    2018-L-002337
     

    Filing Date: 03/06/2018Case Type: INTENTIONAL TORT
    Division: Law DivisionDistrict: First Municipal
    Ad Damnum: $50001.00Calendar: R
    Party Information

    Plaintiff(s)Attorney(s)
    ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL MMUDD LAW OFFICES
    3114 W IRVING PK#1W
    CHICAGO IL, 60618
    (773) 588-5410
    Defendant(s)Defendant Date of ServiceAttorney(s)
    PFEIFFER JOHN G05/21/2018OLP THOMAS G
    1713 SHIRE COURT
    WHEATON IL, 60189
    (630) 220-7329

    Case Activity

    Activity Date: 03/06/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    INTENTIONAL TORT COMPLAINT FILED (JURY DEMAND)
    Court Fee:598.00
    Ad Damnum Amount:50001.00
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 03/06/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    EXHIBITS FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 03/06/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    SUMMONS ISSUED AND RETURNABLE

    Activity Date: 03/06/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    CASE ELECTRONICALLY FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 03/09/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MA
    POSTCARD GENERATED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES
    Microfilm:LD000000000

    Activity Date: 03/09/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    CASE MANAGEMENT DATE GENERATED
    Date:05/02/2018
    Court Time:0930

    Activity Date: 03/21/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    EXHIBITS FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 03/21/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    EXHIBITS FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 03/21/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    NOTICE OF FILING FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 03/21/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 03/22/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    APPOINT SPECIAL DEPUTY - ALLOWED -
    Judge:MCWILLIAMS CLARE ELIZABETH

    Activity Date: 04/02/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    NOTICE OF FILING OF PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 04/17/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    APPEARANCE FILED - NO FEE PAID -
    Attorney:MUDD CHARLES L JR

    Activity Date: 04/30/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    APPEARANCE FILED - NO FEE PAID -
    Attorney:JOAN M MANNIX LTD

    Activity Date: 04/30/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    APPEARANCE FILED - FEE PAID - (JURY DEMAND)
    Court Fee:467.00
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 04/30/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    CERTIFICATE FILED
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 04/30/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    NOTICE OF MOTION FILED
    Date:05/08/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 04/30/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    MOTION FILED
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 04/30/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    MOTION SCHEDULED
    Date:05/08/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 05/01/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    NOTICE OF MOTION FILED
    Date:05/08/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 05/01/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    MOTION SCHEDULED
    Date:05/08/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 05/02/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    EXECUTE OR PERFORM - ALLOWED -
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 05/02/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    PRODUCE EXHIBITS OR OTHER RECORDS OR DOcuмENTS OR PERSON - ALLOWED -
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 05/02/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    STRIKE FROM CASE MANAGEMENT CALL - ALLOWED
    Date:05/08/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 05/02/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    CASE CONTINUED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - ALLOWED -
    Date:05/09/2018
    Court Time:1030
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 05/08/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    APPEARANCE FILED - NO FEE PAID -
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 05/08/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    STRIKE OR WITHDRAW MOTION OR PETITION - ALLOWED -
    Date:05/08/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 05/09/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    EXHIBITS FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 05/09/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    FILE APPEARANCE OR JURY DEMAND, ANSWER OR PLEAD - ALLOWED -
    Date:06/12/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 05/09/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    EXECUTE OR PERFORM - ALLOWED -
    Date:06/12/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 05/09/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    CASE CONTINUED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - ALLOWED -
    Date:06/26/2018
    Court Time:1000
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 05/30/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    SUMMONS - RETD P.S.
    Date:05/21/2018

    Activity Date: 06/19/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    MOTION TO DISMISS FILED
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 06/26/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    CONTINUANCE - ALLOWED -
    Date:08/29/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 06/26/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    FILE AMENDMENT OR ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED PLEADINGS - ALLOWED -
    Date:07/31/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 06/26/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    FILE AMENDMENT OR ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED PLEADINGS - ALLOWED -
    Date:08/21/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 06/26/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    EXECUTE OR PERFORM - ALLOWED -
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 06/26/2018Participant: ROBERT
    EXECUTE OR PERFORM - ALLOWED -
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 06/26/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    COURTESY COPIES REQUIRED - ALLOWED
    Date:08/29/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 06/26/2018Participant: ROBERT
    COURTESY COPIES REQUIRED - ALLOWED
    Date:08/29/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 06/26/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    CASE CONTINUED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - ALLOWED -
    Date:08/29/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 06/26/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    STRIKE OR WITHDRAW COMPLAINT, AMENDED COMPLAINT OR PORTION THEREOF - CNT -
    Date:08/29/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 07/30/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    NOTICE OF MOTION FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 07/30/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    MOTION FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 07/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    EXTEND TIME - ALLOWED -
    Date:08/21/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 07/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    FILE AMENDMENT OR ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED PLEADINGS - ALLOWED -
    Date:08/21/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 07/31/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    FILE AMENDMENT OR ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED PLEADINGS - ALLOWED -
    Date:09/11/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 07/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    COURT DATE TO STAND - ALLOWED
    Date:08/29/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 08/21/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    EXHIBITS FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 08/21/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    MOTION FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 08/23/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    NOTICE OF MOTION FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 08/23/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    AMEND COMPLAINT OR PETITION - ALLOWED -
    Date:08/29/2018
    Judge:MCCARTHY, JAMES P.

    Activity Date: 08/29/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    FILE AMENDMENT OR ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED PLEADINGS - ALLOWED -
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 08/29/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    FILE APPEARANCE OR JURY DEMAND, ANSWER OR PLEAD - ALLOWED -
    Date:09/28/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 08/29/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    EXECUTE OR PERFORM - ALLOWED -
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 08/29/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    AMEND COMPLAINT OR PETITION - ALLOWED -
    Date:08/31/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 08/29/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    CASE CONTINUED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - ALLOWED -
    Date:10/16/2018
    Court Time:1000
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 08/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    CERTIFICATE FILED

    Activity Date: 08/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    EXHIBITS FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 08/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 08/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    NOTICE OF FILING FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 10/09/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    MOTION TO DISMISS FILED
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 10/16/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    CONTINUANCE - ALLOWED -
    Date:10/31/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/16/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    FILE AMENDMENT OR ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED PLEADINGS - ALLOWED -
    Date:10/30/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/16/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    FILE AMENDMENT OR ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED PLEADINGS - ALLOWED -
    Date:10/23/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/16/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    EXECUTE OR PERFORM - ALLOWED -
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/16/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    EXECUTE OR PERFORM - ALLOWED -
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/16/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    STRIKE OR WITHDRAW MOTION OR PETITION - ALLOWED -
    Date:10/31/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/16/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    COURTESY COPIES REQUIRED - ALLOWED
    Date:10/31/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/16/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    COURTESY COPIES REQUIRED - ALLOWED
    Date:10/31/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/16/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    CASE CONTINUED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - ALLOWED -
    Date:10/31/2018
    Court Time:1100
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/23/2018Participant: ROBERTS FATHER MARSHALL M
    MOTION FILED
    Attorney:MUDD LAW OFFICES

    Activity Date: 10/30/2018Participant: PFEIFFER JOHN G
    RESPONSE / REPLY - FILED
    Attorney:OLP THOMAS G

    Activity Date: 10/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    CONTINUANCE - ALLOWED -
    Date:01/07/2019
    Court Time:1100
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    EXECUTE OR PERFORM - ALLOWED -
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    COURTESY COPIES REQUIRED - ALLOWED
    Date:11/02/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/31/2018Participant: PFEIFFER
    COURTESY COPIES REQUIRED - ALLOWED
    Date:11/02/2018
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    CASE CONTINUED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - ALLOWED -
    Date:01/07/2019
    Court Time:1100
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 10/31/2018Participant: ROBERTS
    STRIKE OR WITHDRAW MOTION OR PETITION - CONTINUED -
    Date:01/07/2019
    Court Time:1100
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 01/07/2019Participant: PFEIFFER
    FILE AMENDMENT OR ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED PLEADINGS - ALLOWED -
    Date:01/28/2019
    Judge:LAWLER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD

    Activity Date: 01/07/2019Participant: ROBERTS MARSHAL
    STRIKE OR WITHDRAW COMPLAINT, AMENDED COMPLAINT OR PORTION THEREOF - ALW -
    [


    Offline St Paul

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 151
    • Reputation: +144/-63
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #56 on: February 20, 2019, 03:58:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • One can only imagine how much in legal fees and costs have already been generated over the last year with apparently no end in sight.

    Makes one wonder if fr. Pfeiffer informs benefactors where their money is spent.
    I know for a fact he refuses to open his books when legally requested.  You've got to file a suit if you want to see his books, and there will be no guarantee you see the real books.
    Do people know there isn't an OLMC "seminary" or "convent" 501c3?  That none of their donations are tax deductible?  Do they know OLMC doesn't have a bank account, that all money goes through an account in Mr. Hernandez' name?

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31174
    • Reputation: +27088/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #57 on: February 20, 2019, 04:00:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Makes one wonder if fr. Pfeiffer informs benefactors where their money is spent.
    I know for a fact he refuses to open his books when legally requested.  You've got to file a suit if you want to see his books, and there will be no guarantee you see the real books.
    Do people know there isn't an OLMC "seminary" or "convent" 501c3?  That none of their donations are tax deductible?  Do they know OLMC doesn't have a bank account, that all money goes through an account in Mr. Hernandez' name?

    One of these days a benefactor is going to get randomly audited by the IRS (it happens, you know! Just not for those who make less than $50,000 a year. There just isn't enough potential payoff to make it worth the IRS effort of an audit), maybe they donated several thousand to OLMC which they deducted as a charitable contribution, and then the crap is going to hit the fan.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41846
    • Reputation: +23909/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #58 on: February 20, 2019, 04:41:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Mr. John Pfeiffer's lawyer (which might have been himself, since he is a lawyer) must have had a field day with this one.

    All he'd need to do is show evidence, on the Internet and elsewhere, that suggests Fr. Roberts was not a "respected clergyman" as of dates that precede whatever statements John Pfeiffer made (specific exhibits that Fr. Roberts put forward as evidence against him).

    I accidentally downthumbed this, when I meant to quote it.  Sorry.  But as admin you can fix that :-)

    Indeed, the entire grounds for the suit is the damage done to Father Marshall's "reputation".  In point of fact, Father Marshall had LONG been under suspicion well before the statements made by John Pfeiffer.

    Offline Wmt2020wmt

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 1
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Marshall Roberts Update?
    « Reply #59 on: September 25, 2020, 11:41:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Hi,
    I realize this is an old thread, but I found it from googling Fr. Marshall Robert's name.  I was prompted to do some research when my parish which is in the Jackson Diocese sent out the following statement:

    Statement on Fr. Marshall Roberts -- The Diocese of Jackson has issued the following statement yesterday:  

    Father Marshall Roberts, an incardinated priest of the Diocese of Scranton, has reportedly assumed residence in Water Valley, Mississippi in the Diocese of Jackson. Since January 2005, Father Roberts has been unlawfully absent from priestly ministry in the Diocese of Scranton and does not have permission to exercise priestly ministry outside of the Diocese of Scranton. Furthermore, Father Marshall Roberts does not possess the faculty to validly hear confessions. Any inquiries about the priestly ministry of Father Marshall Roberts are to be directed to the Vicar General of the Diocese of Jackson: Reverend Lincoln Dall Chancery Building 237 E. Amite Street, Jackson, MS 39201 - 601-960-8476.

    This brought-up many thoughts and feelings for me because our bishop, Joseph Kopacz, is also from the Scranton Diocese.  Bishop Kopacz knew that Fr. Lenin Vargas was defrauding parishoners at my home parish in Starkville, MS, and he did nothing to protect our parish.  I am so angry and unhappy with the bishop's response once some clergy went to the authorities and the investigation began.  He allowed Fr. Lenin to devastate our parish, and we have no recourse to even complain to church hierarchy about our bishop.  I would like to write to church oversight, if it exists.  Does anyone have any suggestions short of writing Pope Francis?