CathInfo.com

In reading the new addition of TheRecusant, I went back and re-read (for the third time) the good article of Bishop Williamson's "OPEN LETTER TO PRIESTS of the SOCIETY of ST PIUS X", and it stands out all the more disingenuous of Fr. Laisney to try and skirt the issues of Bishop Williamson's objections like a "south-paw" in a boxing ring.

In other words, Fr. Laisney remains without credence in tip-toeing around the MAJOR issues Bishop Williamson presented; while giving a "poodle" attack on only some of the minor issues; making it look like he is a intellectual "bull dog" (not against the Lion), only to respond to Bishop Williamson and say: "...it is superfluous to go through each paragraph."

In another point of the hypocrisy of these liberals.  Fr. Laisney is the first to "bash" anyone who "disrespects" the authority of Bishop Fellay in this liberal agenda, so what does Fr. Laisney do?  He is the first to "bash" Bishop Williamson with disrespect and the priesthood of his brother priests in the "resistance" standing up for the Faith.

Also with reflection, I notice that Fr. Laisney has been the only one (next to Fr. Rostand) who really has come out to fight and push this new liberal theology of the N-SSPX with so many articles that are published on the various sspx websites.

When I go back to remember that Fr. Laisney was also in the "fight" with Fr. Aulagnier to get the official SSPX in an "approval and recognition" compromise, like Campos has in the same deal situation with conciliar Rome, it seems that Fr. Laisney's day is here; and he is gleaning in his ears to take this "puppy" and run with it, as his own, and take it for a home run delivered to the conciliar coffins.

What is really "superfluous" is all of this N-SSPX nonsense.

Remember N-SSPX priests, thou art a Priest of the High Priest, please act like one.

That looked like a snake, but now -- is it a lion's tail?? And a fox?

Good stuff here, Machabees!


Post

In reading the new addition of TheRecusant, I went back and re-read (for the third time) the good article of Bishop Williamson's "OPEN LETTER TO PRIESTS of the SOCIETY of ST PIUS X", and it stands out all the more disingenuous of Fr. Laisney to try and skirt the issues of Bishop Williamson's objections like a "south-paw" in a boxing ring.

In other words, Fr. Laisney remains without credence in tip-toeing around the MAJOR issues Bishop Williamson presented; while giving a "poodle" attack on only some of the minor issues; making it look like he is a intellectual "bull dog" (not against the Lion), only to respond to Bishop Williamson and say: "...it is superfluous to go through each paragraph."

In another point of the hypocrisy of these liberals, Fr. Laisney is the first to "bash" anyone who "disrespects" the authority of Bishop Fellay in this liberal agenda, so what does Fr. Laisney do?  He is the first to "bash" Bishop Williamson with disrespect and the priesthood of his brother priests in the "resistance" standing up for the Faith.

I've returned to this thread three times and this one paragraph keeps standing
out to me.  The hypocrisy aspect of what you have noticed here, Machabees,
is most telling.  There has got to be a way of putting this whole scenario into
a capsule that you can drop on the Accordistas.  What do they need to hear?  
How can this be explained without making their ears close and their minds
wander -- they've been TRUTH-PROOFED and such FACTS do not get through
their boilerplate pre-determined subjective reality.  This does not fit their world
view.  Someone must have the trick method..

Who is it?



This message of Fr. Laisney and Fr. Rostand coming out to push new liberal
theology of the Neo-SSPX via articles published in DICI and sspx.org -- this
is the kind of message that we should have on flash cards to memorize,
because when we face the ignorant this is what will inform them.  Do they
want their grandson to be a seminarian under this kind of leadership - new
liberal theology?? Is that what we want to have bearing on our conscience
at our particular judgment, that we knew better and we said nothing???!!!

Also with reflection, I notice that Fr. Laisney has been the only one (next to Fr. Rostand) who really has come out to fight and push this new liberal theology of the N-SSPX with so many articles that are published on the various sspx websites.

When I go back to remember that Fr. Laisney was also in the "fight" with Fr. Aulagnier to get the official SSPX in an "approval and recognition" compromise, like Campos has in the same deal situation with conciliar Rome, it seems that
Fr. Laisney's day is here; and he is gleaning in his ears to take this "puppy" and run with it, as his own, and take it for a home run delivered to the conciliar coffins.

What is really "superfluous" is all of this N-SSPX nonsense.

Remember N-SSPX priests, thou art a Priest of the High Priest, please act like one.