Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr, Kramer unleashed intellectual slobbery on my corrections of him.  (Read 8751 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fr, Kramer unleashed intellectual slobbery on my corrections of him.
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2016, 03:46:38 PM »
Quote from: Servus Pius

That's the problem with Amateur Theologians. They may have an abundance of Knowledge but Application is a totally different thing.  It is like saying---I have read thousands of Medical Books, so now I can perform a Hearth Bypass operation.  Fr.Kramer has the Knowledge, Experience, Formal Training and Necessary Qualifications to be a Theologian.  Gerard from FE does NOT have those qualifications.  Gerard hides his inadequacy by means of his Writing Skills. Gerard has very good writing skills, I'll afford him that much. However, when it comes to Theology, Gerard is a FRAUDULENT Theologian.  He has very good research skills but that doesn't make him an Expert Theologian. He has very good writing skills, but that doesn't make him an Expert Theologian either.

I wouldn't be surprised why Fr.Kramer would feel EXASPERATED from this guy. What makes Gerard from FE so dangerous is the fact that he could express his ERRORS in an ELOQUENT way which gives people the impression that he is an Expert Theologian.

We have 2 choices here, either we side with Fr.Paul Kramer who is a Qualified and Trained Theologian or shall we side with GERARD who is just a Wannabe Theologian.



Aristotle argues to the contrary.  A liberally educated man who knows the first principles of something can render judgment on the veracity of a specialist's argument.  

This is the same concept in which someone like You, me or Fr. Kramer may render judgement on something outside of a field of speciality like Economic theory,  Evolution or Cardinal Kaspar's proposals for Communion for the Divorced and Remarried or the wrongness of the idea of Pope Benedict "extending the Petrine ministry."  


Fr, Kramer unleashed intellectual slobbery on my corrections of him.
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2016, 03:48:32 PM »
Quote from: Servus Pius



On point number 7, I've increased the font size and put it in BOLD which you could see above, Mr.Gerard's statement and I quote:  the Pope alone has the AUTHORITY to INTRODUCE NEW RITES or MODIFY OLD ONE as HE SEES FIT. end of quote

What more proof do we need??? This guy has PUBLICLY expressed his HERESY.

This guy is a SERIOUS MENACE in our Forum. The ENEMY is in our midst!  For crying out loud--Let's KICK Him OUT!


Go read Mediator Dei before you condemn what's in your ransom note.  


Fr, Kramer unleashed intellectual slobbery on my corrections of him.
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2016, 03:55:01 PM »
Gerard:
Quote
But for simplicity's sake everything that Paul VI put into the Novus Ordo contained the substance of what is necessary for a valid consecration and sacrificial offering.  


Would the Archbishop have said  differently?  Would Bp. Williamson say differently?  For that matter, would Bp. Fellay contest the validity of a properly celebrated NO Mass, sans balloons, pancake-sized hosts and dancing  girls?  If so, then the past words of these clerics have given me, for one, an entirely erroneous impression.  I have  totally misunderstood them.

Fr, Kramer unleashed intellectual slobbery on my corrections of him.
« Reply #13 on: June 01, 2016, 04:36:09 PM »
Quote from: hollingsworth
Gerard:
Quote
But for simplicity's sake everything that Paul VI put into the Novus Ordo contained the substance of what is necessary for a valid consecration and sacrificial offering.  


Would the Archbishop have said  differently?  Would Bp. Williamson say differently?  For that matter, would Bp. Fellay contest the validity of a properly celebrated NO Mass, sans balloons, pancake-sized hosts and dancing  girls?  If so, then the past words of these clerics have given me, for one, an entirely erroneous impression.  I have  totally misunderstood them.


They are the people that have demonstrated to me that the Novus Ordo is not an issue of whether or not Paul VI had the power to do what he did, they concede he did.  They don't argue about validity if done "by the books"

They argue as I do, the lack of traditional defenses of the Novus Ordo and the prudence of the post-Vatican II changes.  

The people arguing against me are simply arguing against them.  



Fr, Kramer unleashed intellectual slobbery on my corrections of him.
« Reply #14 on: June 01, 2016, 06:43:47 PM »
Whatever!  I don't want to discourage the don Quixotes  of this forum, who go about jousting against the windmills of evil.