Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Kevin Robinson (SSPX) sues New Jersey governor  (Read 8355 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Fr. Kevin Robinson (SSPX) sues New Jersey governor
« Reply #10 on: May 02, 2020, 04:44:04 PM »
I knew him at seminary.  While I applaud the effort, what the heck is he doing by saying that he hopes to be classified as an “essential service”.  That is to basically concede the state’s position that they can violate constitutional rights if you’re not an “essential service”?
THIS^^^^^

Re: Fr. Kevin Robinson (SSPX) sues New Jersey governor
« Reply #11 on: May 02, 2020, 04:47:09 PM »
THIS^^^^^
Looks like irrational criticism of the SSPX is the norm around these parts.  :laugh1:


Re: Fr. Kevin Robinson (SSPX) sues New Jersey governor
« Reply #12 on: May 02, 2020, 04:56:48 PM »
Looks like irrational criticism of the SSPX is the norm around these parts.  :laugh1:

Quote from: OP
The lawsuit, filed by Christopher Ferrara of the St. Thomas More Society of Catholic Lawyers

Ferrara = Francis = NWO

Re: Fr. Kevin Robinson (SSPX) sues New Jersey governor
« Reply #13 on: May 02, 2020, 04:58:18 PM »
Looks like irrational criticism of the SSPX is the norm around these parts.  :laugh1:

Are you tipping your hand?

The priest should simply resume saying public Masses, without regard to the illegitimate intrusion of the temporal authority into the spiritual sphere.

One does not ask permission to do one’s duty.

Complying with these tyrannical police state measures only guarantees and emboldens their tyrannical police state, and further enslaves us.

What is needed to remedy the situation is widespread civil disobedience.

Re: Fr. Kevin Robinson (SSPX) sues New Jersey governor
« Reply #14 on: May 02, 2020, 05:00:07 PM »
Ferrara = Francis = NWO
My apologies if I understood incorrectly. I thought it was Fr. Robinson being quoted.
But my argument still stands via my post above (not about SSPX criticism, but about using terms such as "essential" in a legal battle).