Thank you for your previous reply about the marriage agreement. Now regarding you statement: "They condemn Vatican 2( religious liberty, ecuмenism, collegiality, etc) and that is enough."
Would you like to qualify or expand that statement OR do you actually mean that as long as they (SSPX) condemns Vatican II and the problems within the counsel docuмents, that is enough?
What I mean is that as long as they condemn those things, no other problems should arise that are of any importance. Part of condemning religious liberty, ecuмenism, and collegiality means NOT associating with people who accept them( ie Conciliarists ) Fr. Gleize has given solid reasons for opposing agreement with Rome( and he’s the one they sent out to talk to Rome.)
I can understand disagreeing with some of the Society’s prudential decisions but to say it’s gone Liberal is disingenuous