Those who stay in the Novus Ordo, FSSP, diocesan Indult, etc. at least don't have a problem with the Conciliar Church. They see no major Crisis, just a few "implementation hiccups" that took place at Vatican II. So their truck/commerce with the Conciliar Church is understandable.

The group I describe -- dogmatic home aloners -- who stay aloof from the whole world of Tradition, despite a full acknowledgement to the Crisis in the Church and the evils of Vatican II, is sick and boggles my mind. It's the worst kind of error.

We obviously need to respect our priests, and they do have a certain amount of authority that comes merely from their exalted state due to their Ordination and operating in persona Christi.  But they do not have any canonical or doctrinal authority.  So, for instance, if a priest preaches something from the pulpit I don't agree with, I might talk to him about it, but I will not go around the parish rabble-rousing against the priest.  So, for instance, if a Priest is R&R, while I am sedevacantist, I'm not going to go around his chapel promoting sedevacantism, or leave pro-sedevacantist pamphlets all over the church, etc.  If someone asks me my opinion, I would give it honestly, but I would not cause issues at the chapel.  But I do not feel any obligation to become R&R myself, since he doesn't have any authority to impose his opinion on consciences.  That's where his authority ends, IMO.

It is not the norm for the adherents of SSPX chapels to call their chapels a "parish". Archbishop Lefebvre was careful to make the distinction, because he did not intend to set up a counter-church. If some SSPX adherents make the mistake of calling their SSPX chapel a "Parish," it's not the end of the world.

In a crisis situation, the regular and new code of canon law does not necessarily apply. I don't believe that the new code of canon law addresses times of crisis. Do you agree that we are in a crisis situation?

Unless this Fr. Carley has been appointed by his diocesan NO superior, he should not be called a pastor.
---------

Is that enough examples for you?

It is clear most sspx chapels use the words churches, parishes and pastors in describing themselves. It is a big deal because it goes against what ABL taught and it goes against what the SSPX what created as: missionaries.

It is deceit, plain and simple.

Please explain what you mean by the SSPX being created as "Missionaries," because I don't recall that Archbishop Lefebvre himself used that descriptor for SSPX.

Precisely, Leonn, this is exactly what is happening.
This is the predicament in which we now find ourselves.
As Bishop Williamson keeps saying, "The Shepherd is struck and the sheep are scattered".
Unity and authority in the Church come down from the Pope, and when he goes astray, all chaos breaks loose, as we can see.
It is worth reading the last two Eleison Comments about this which are posted on this site
It seems only a miracle will restore the Church now, and the message of Fatima gives us that hope.
Division, however, is the history of the Church. Look at the tens of thousands of sects that have split off all down through the ages, even in better times when authority was faithful. Likewise, it is the history of the SSPX. I think many people don't realise just how many divisions there have been, scarcely a year going by without some group leaving to the left or the right. So too now with the Resistance. Alas, when human beings are involved, it is impossible for it to be otherwise. Our consolation is that, even though the truth be overshadowed, God will never abandon any soul of good will that earnestly seeks Him. Let us take heed lest we fall, and be full of charity for our neighbor and our erring brethren in these confused times.

It is not the norm for the adherents of SSPX chapels to call their chapels a "parish". Archbishop Lefebvre was careful to make the distinction, because he did not intend to set up a counter-church. If some SSPX adherents make the mistake of calling their SSPX chapel a "Parish," it's not the end of the world.

In a crisis situation, the regular and new code of canon law does not necessarily apply. I don't believe that the new code of canon law addresses times of crisis. Do you agree that we are in a crisis situation?

The SSPX was legitimately established as a missionary order.  They sometimes forget that, and call their chapels "parishes".  And, yes, canon law applies to them.