CathInfo.com

Well, bishop Williamson told Fr. Pfeiffer that if the bishop were to help Fr. Pfeiffer then pablo (Mr. Hernandez the "lay exorcist") had go.  The other condition was that Fr. Pfeiffer had to stay put and tend the seminary (no more travelling the world).  Seems to me like a reasonable trade.  

The problem is two-fold:
1. Fr. Pfeiffer won't accept anyone telling him what to do, not even a bishop Fr. Pfeiffer seeks to place himself under.  This has been a problem since his SSPX days.  It is why fr. Pfeiffer got "rid" of Moran the first time.  Moran declared, from the pulpit, he had jurisdiction over OLMC.  
2. Fr. Pfeiffer has become ensnared by the warlock Pablo.

It is against canon law for a priest to go a long time without a superior.  "Long time" is not defined, but certainly eight years would count as a long time.  

Well, no Traditional Catholic priest or even bishop has any CANONICAL superior anyway, which is what is meant by Canon Law.  You can't normally just shop around for a superior.

Sure enough -- Fr. Chazal was completely innocent. Canon Law requires that the Blessed Sacrament be under several keys: the tabernacle, the building itself, etc. If the tabernacle doesn't lock for whatever reason, the Blessed Sacrament must be removed. Fr. Chazal did exactly what he should have done in those circuмstances.

Why am I not surprised that the Pfeifferites were playing games, changing locks, messing with the tabernacle, etc. How do they look at themselves in the mirror or sleep at night? They're clearly of bad will. They need to meditate on the shortness of life, and the great length of Eternity.