Note at 28 minutes, Fr. Pfeiffer says that Fr. Hewko (doesn't mention him by name) has received a canonical warning that he may be expelled from the Society.

Now, a few weeks ago, a priest of our Society repeats the words of the Society, of Archbishop Lefebvre. He repeats the same things we've been speaking for the last 40 years. And he now receives his canonical warning that he may be expelled from the Society because he spoke in disagreement of the Superior General whose name he never mentioned once in the sermon given at the seminary a few weeks ago. And the situation in the church he mentioned not once. He spoke only the same things we've been preaching the last 40 years. How did this become a means of expulsion? What has happened?

eddiearent.
This one works:

The video at the link is still private.

Slightly different version, but this appears to be the same sermon:


(In looking, I also found this sermon hot off the press from Fr Girouard:
)

Thanks for posting these links MaterDominici...
Great sermons from true sons of ABL!

Viva Cristo Rey!

There is a July 8 sermon from Fr. Pfeiffer up on YouTube.

Note at 28 minutes, Fr. Pfeiffer says that Fr. Hewko (doesn't mention him by name) has received a canonical warning that he may be expelled from the Society.

Quote from: Fr Pfeiffer

Now, a few weeks ago, a priest of our Society repeats the words of the Society, of Archbishop Lefebvre. He repeats the same things we've been speaking for the last 40 years. And he now receives his canonical warning that he may be expelled from the Society because he spoke in disagreement of the Superior General whose name he never mentioned once in the sermon given at the seminary a few weeks ago. And the situation in the church he mentioned not once. He spoke only the same things we've been preaching the last 40 years. How did this become a means of expulsion? What has happened?

29:57 Something is wrong, and it must be repaired! These things were never
controversies before in the Society of Saint Pius the Tenth, but now they're
controversies. Priests all throughout the world are being silenced -- because
they're only preaching the same thing we've always preached: the Council is
against God!

At minute 31 he mentions +de Mallerais' book where it says that if you take what
you learn from St. Thomas Aquinas and the Traditional faith, and try to put it into
the docuмents of Vatican II, it doesn't work, because Vat.II is a Modernist
compilation of Modernist teachings using the language of Modernism, and it cannot
be understood in a Catholic sense. When you try, you get nonsense. "It can only
be understood using modern philosophy."

I have a recording of Canon Gregory Hesse where he says he tried for 15 years
to get a traditional interpretation of Vat. II and could not: he said he "guarantees"
that doing so is impossible.

Fr. Pfeiffer, in this sermon on the Most Precious Blood of Jesus, also says that he
spoke to Fr. Gruner a few weeks ago who told him that all the experts on Fatima
agree that Our Lady came to warn us there would be an evil council. [He would
have been referring to what we know of the Third Secret here.] She did not say
that it would be a council that evil men would misinterpret. She said that the
council itself would be evil. It's not like a bunch of bad men took a good football,
and intercepted it to run into the wrong end zone. "It was taking the truths of faith
and changing them, and it was by intention, of alpha into omega." 31:20

Note: skip 34:37 - 35:15 because he lost his place in the Book of Osee. That spot
really distracted me and I lost track of the message the first time. I'm over that
now!
 
In the end, it will come down to all of the efforts of man, for 50 years now, and
more, all the combined intelligence of the most diligent workers trying to achieve
world peace and answers to social problems, will be of no avail, and we will lose
not only our peace but our Church, inasmuch as she will be in eclipse. It is going
to take the intervention of the Blessed Virgin Mary to return our world to a state
of peace. In our Mass we pray for the freedom and exultation of Holy Mother
Church.

Pls forgive any errors it's 10:30pm 75 deg. F. and 100% humidity and it's been hot
all day -- I'm tired but I can't sleep, and typing is pretty iffy too!

Sorry, I'm just not on board with that one. Too vague. When Our Lady speaks,
it's not vague. Every line of that leaves me asking questions. That is not what
the words of the Mother of God do: they leave you with answers, not questions.


There will be a wicked council planned and prepared that will change the
countenance of the Church.

What exactly is the "countenance of the Church?" I assist at Mass every Sunday
and a lot of weekdays where it looks identical to what I recall in 1959.

Many will lose the Faith; confusion will reign everywhere. The sheep will
search for their shepherds in vain.

And what is the consequence of "losing the faith?" How does "confusion" reign?
How is it some sheep do not search in vain -- what should they look for?

A schism will tear apart the holy tunic of My Son.

The Tunic of Jesus was just put on display, and it's not torn: what is meant by
"the tunic of My Son," if not that? You think I'm kidding? Show me another part of
the revealed words of Our Lady's message in Fatima where she speaks in some
kind of parable. There is none.

This will be the end of times, foretold in the Holy Scriptures and recalled to
memory by Me in many places.

Is the "end of times" the end of the world? According to Scripture, we are to
believe no one who claims to know that -- so we should not believe these are the
words of Our Lady, because she would never say "this will be the end  of times."

The abomination of abominations will reach its peak and it will bring the
chastisement announced at La Salette.

What is this "abomination?" If it is so important, why doesn't she identify it? How
do we know this mention of La Salette isn't just for show? When has Our Lady in
one apparition defer to a previous one instead of being specific? Never. It's
important to keep this in mind. She's consistent, but she does not refer across to
other settings, only to her present setting. She came to Sister Lucia in later years
and referred back to 1917 and those visions, but not to Pontmain, or Rue de Bac,
or Mexico, or Lourdes, or La Salette or whatever.

My Son's arm, which I will not be able to hold back anymore, will punish this
poor world, which must expiate its crimes.

What exactly are these "crimes" she speaks of? Not recycling? NO? I can give you
the phone number of 5 people who believe that's the worst crime possible. And I
don't have very many phone numbers. Could it be political incorrectness? There
are a lot of people who think that's a crime. Or hate crime? Maybe "negativity!"
Now, that's a really bad crime. How about racial discrimination? Now that's a
crime if there ever was one! Is that what we should be expiate?????

One will only speak about wars and revolutions.

Sorry, but this sounds too much like Medjugorje.

The elements of nature will be unchained and will cause anguish even among
the best (the most courageous).

So are we supposed to wait for earthquakes, tornadoes, thunderstorms,
hurricanes, meteors, locusts, plague and floods? Wait -- not floods: that's not
going to be the big one; Fire. Are we supposed to wait for fire?

The Church will bleed from all Her wounds.

Will the Church bleed from wounds due to fire? Or from any of the other
"unchained elements of nature?" And what constitutes a "wound of the Church?"
How does it "bleed?"

Happy are they who will persevere and search for refuge in My Heart, because
in the end My Immaculate Heart will triumph....

Finally, something that makes sense! But why should we have to wade through all
the cryptic jumble to arrive at this?

What difference will hearing the real Third Secret make to everyone who hears it?

Will it make them want to take a nap? Or perhaps say an extra rosary? The best
consequence I've heard is that when it is finally made public, Catholics worldwide
will flock to their local parishes and stand in line for Confession. There will be lines
of people that stand for days, waiting to confess their sins. That makes sense to
me. But I do not see that in these words, above. I don't even see one person who
might decide to go to confession after reading that. Well, maybe one. But not two.