CathInfo.com

I tell you, something's up with anyone who is a Feeneyist... stay away from Justin Stamm on SubStack and X (and other places too like Telegram) as well, he's claiming Hitler was actually a devout Catholic and he says he has the evidence for it, but he's also a Feeneyist and said "peter dimond is one of the greatest theologians of our time." He's suspicious. I might talk about it some other day.

You're just another EENS-denying heretic who blames everything on soome "Feeneyist" hiding behind every bush in order to justify your own hreetical depravity.

Then you gaslight about Hitler too, easily manipulated by propaganda, as if "Feeneyism" and one's understanding of who Hitler was are in any way, shape, or form related.  You might want to look at the actual evidence before showing yourself a propagandized moron.  Hitler was in fact a devoted Catholic.  How devout is hard to say.  He attended Mass every Sunday, though the reports suggest that he did not receive Holy Communion regularly.  When a fellow nαzι official went to visit him prior to his becoming a leader in the party, while he delivered a postive overall evaluation of Hitler, he did complain of his "superstition" of having a statue of Our Lady in his apartment, but he considered it a relatively minor defect that he would be willing to overlook in lieu of his other qualities.  Hitler claimed to have seen a vision of Our Lady in his youth, but of course that could be imagination or some psychological issue.  You don't have to be some "Feeneyist" or "Dimondist" to be able to read, study, and cut through propaganda.  99% of the evil attributed to Hitler was allied propaganda, some to demonize him to get people to enlist in the military, others to justify the creation of Israel.

As for the Brother Dimond comment, he's clearly not a theologian, but then the only Traditionalist theologian ever was actually Bishop Guerard des Lauriers.  While not a theologian, which sometimes causes the Dimond Brothers to make (relatively minor) errors in reasoning, you can count on one hand the number of Traditional Catholics who do not deny EENS, who do not claim that non-Catholics can be saved, who do not promote varying degrees of Pelagianism, who are not thinly-veiled Old Catholics, who did not at least condone if not actively support the grave moral evil of voting for a pro-abortion pro-sodomite pro-genocide Jєωιѕн puppet Trump, who do not condone the evil of NFP ... so if by "greatest theologians" you mean the individuals who are closest to being right and to have made the correct conclusion about almost every controverted topic, then in that loose sense of the world he's not wrong.

Now, the Dimond Brothers were half right, but half wrong about Our Lady as Co-Redemptrix ... and they fell for Trump's schtick for a while (but that's more of an error in prudential judgment than on a theological matter).  But about everything else, not only are they right, but they've done some of the most solid research out there on a variety of subjects.  Of all the more dogmatic sedevacantists, they have in fact by far the most balanced view of papal infallibility among Trads, where most SVs errr by excess, and nearly all R&R erro by defect.

I think Ladislaus so often descends into vulgar hysterics because he is actually not that intelligent. Where reason falls short, scream and shout to get the point across, right?