CathInfo.com

Fr. Timothy Scott Hoopes reportedly has described himself as a ‘magician’ and was confirmed to have ordered a book on astrology previously prohibited by the Catholic Church.
 Shutterstock

• 
  5

The reason for moving Mass was that Bill has developed new theological opinions (he believes that traditionalist bishops have some sort of automatically granted jurisdiction or power to rule, and that they should proceed to elect a new “pope”) … This prompted him to say that my bishops and priestly confraternity are not up to snuff, because we do not believe in said jurisdiction or powers, making me to be an “independent priest” with none of the necessary authority or power to do anything, and so he would substantially dictate the terms of everything at St. Charles Borromeo until I could receive the proper power to do this from a bishop that met his criteria; he was explicit that he could put up with me “for a while,” but not in the long term, and mentioned bringing in a second priest. And of course, there were some points of criticism he made, which I accepted and upon which we even agreed.
If he believed the things he said about bishops and jurisdiction, it would be a mortal sin for him even to attend my Mass, let alone to host it. It would also be a mortal sin for me to offer Mass in a place where a layman announced his intention to dictate the terms of sacred things to me. Finally, it is not right to continue receiving contributions from the faithful, under one pretext, when there is an intent to divert the whole community and its benefactions in another direction that they had not been intending to support. I informed him three times in the course of our conversation, that there would be no Mass if things stood thus; having heard nothing from him by Saturday evening, there was nothing else to do but move the Mass elsewhere. My hope is that this is temporary and we will come to an understanding, and indeed I did not want to move the Mass elsewhere as this is very stressful to the whole community, myself and Bill included, I am sure.

Our Faith tells us that we owe restitution in some circuмstances. For example, many people gave many thousands towards the Rectory; one could not take all that money and then turn on a dime. The whole reason for the change in the Board of the FOSCB, was to be sure that the congregation felt they had a say in what would ultimately happen with their contributions, so that neither you nor I would have done any injustice to them, nor incurred any debt. Some may feel misled if they gave to the restoration of the church building, others may not, you can ask them if your conscience prompts you to do so; money taken to pay utilities is legitimate and can be kept.

I, William M. Price, witnessed an exhibit arranged by Fr. Timothy Hoopes at St. Charles Church, Cheboygan, MI, for All Souls Day, 2025. Father’s exhibit included replicas of human skulls and gourds. Father notified curious observers of the Church’s habit of displaying such in the Middle Ages. Also, Father prepared a certain mixture, available to the faithful to take and burn in their homes to ward off evil spirits. 
As a seventy-eight-year-old cradle Catholic, I have never witnessed any such event in any Catholic church I attended during my lifetime.

Incidentally, a police record confirms that Hoopes recently picked up a 13th century book on astrology which was addressed to Hoopes’ residence at the St. Charles rectory, and mistakenly delivered to St. Charles Church according to Price, who found it there. 
The book is a historical work on medieval astrology and divination, identified as Decem tractatus astronomiae, attributed to the 13th-century Italian astrologer Guido Bonatti and written in Latin with astrological diagrams.
According to Lapp, the book was previously banned by the Catholic Church, and if a priest obtained it without requesting permission from his bishop, Lapp argued, he would have “incurred the automatic punishment of apostasy.” Bonatti was a prohibited author according to the local Indexes of Venice (1554), Rome (1559), and Parma (1580) and this specific book was prohibited in the Portuguese Index of 1561 because of its teachings on predictive astrology.

Bishop Gerardo Zendejas warned against ordaining Hoopes
In an audio recording obtained by LifeSiteNews, SSPX Resistance Bishop Gerardo Zendejas said he had advised the late Bishop Richard Williamson not to ordain Hoopes. Zendejas is not a native English speaker.
“He has been in many places, and we told Bishop Williamson not to ordain him because we have many backgrounds in scam – some kind of scam,” Zendejas told Lapp. “But he ran away from the seminary that we have. He just left with no reason. He disappeared. So, and whatever afterwards (he) was doing, we find out that always he got in problem (sic). So, he is a very problematic person.”
“And he makes stories and stories and stories, and just he makes, like you say, fraud. This is what he is a specialist in – to make frauds,” Zendejas continued. 
He later warned Lapp, “Be careful. Be careful with (Hoopes) – because he has done this. You are the fourth or fifth (group with whom he) has made some kind of trick.”
Price’s reputation damaged with congregation, family
Lapp has also requested on Price’s behalf that the SSPX Resistance bishops correct the record regarding statements by Hoopes that have damaged Price’s reputation. Lapp himself has heard “members of the community state that Price forced the congregation from St. Charles and defrauded the faithful.” 
Price noted that Hoopes’ allegations about him have resulted in the alienation of a few of Price’s family members, causing significant personal distress for him and his wife.
Price says that, before Hoopes’ 2024 arrival, he had devoted about five years to acquiring, restoring, and preparing St. Charles Borromeo Church so that Catholic worship could resume there.
During that period, Price says he invested at least $200,000 of his own funds in the property.
He also says he contributed an extraordinary amount of personal labor to restoring the church. Price personally remodeled multiple rooms in the basement and built a custom bathroom for Hoopes as well as custom furniture (such as a large reading stand) for the priest so he could walk on a treadmill while studying.
Hoopes’ response
Hoopes declined to address the specific allegations and statements in detail. In response to questions from LifeSiteNews about his own statements to his congregation about their transfer out of St. Charles as well as about his purchase of a book on astrology, Hoopes stated the following:

After a review and thoughtful consideration of your questions, I judge that the church is the proper forum for discussing such matters, rather than the press. I strongly disagree with the implications and mischaracterizations implied by the questions as posed. They lack the important and relevant context; they are based upon false assumptions and/or innuendos, and reflect a lack of understanding of church operations.
Finally, I do not see how such matters are in the public interest; therefore, I have no present intention of discussing them in public. If such matters require discussion at all, one should address them within our community, with the involvement of the church, the Board of the Friends of St. Charles, and immediately affected persons.
Finally, I will say for my part: I profess the integral Catholic Faith, meaning I tender not only the assent of Faith due to Her infallible teachings, but also the pious and religious assent due to Her authentic magisterium. All that Holy Mother Church rejects as heretical, false, impious, rash, temerarious, superstitious, immoral, etc., I also reject along with Her in the same sense and terms as She Herself does.

... the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) faces allegations that [they] instigated the removal of a 78-year-old veteran from the board of a church nonprofit, refused to offer Mass in the church when the veteran refused to transfer its ownership to him, and misled donors about how their contributions would be used.