Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: sea leopard on June 22, 2013, 10:06:26 AM

Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: sea leopard on June 22, 2013, 10:06:26 AM

I should have made this a new item, therefore more visibility. Sorry for doubling bandwidth.


                       ________FACT_________



Fr. Hewko flew in from Our Lady of Mount Carmel, and came to Winona, to be with his family, NOT to confront anyone.


He is a Catholic Priest, par excellence.


He stayed by himself at a "low profile" motel on the east end of town.


At Thursday night dinner, with his family, he was told "he should NOT be on the cemetery (seminary) grounds. (Editorial License - I play with words.)


The source is the '"BOSS"' and the ramifications for a new Priest are obvious to all who have been aware of the SSPX rebranding, change of direction.


Therefore, the BEST Fr. could do, was pray his Breviary, parked on a PUBLIC road at the same elevation (actually higher) a very short distance away, (feet, not miles) during the ordination of his nephew.


Catholic charity at its' finest!!!!! (my pejorative comment to this otherwise factual reporting)



___________Was the parking of a Winona County Sheriffs' car at the entrance to the cemetery, I mean seminary, supposed to imply something. No Tradcats among Winona's Finest. _________



I believe this was the largest turnout in the past 10 years at least. Over 200 tent/campers, main tent full, north side outside of tent chairs at 90%, south side garage full, car parking in north cow pasture full, (some mud, 2 inches of rain during thursday night, and very wet previous couple weeks) and the south hay field was full.


A tall Priest was observed assisting an inexperienced young driver who was "buried" in the mud. His "old SSPX" prayers were soon rewarded by a tractor and 40 ft. of chain. Novus Order catholic charity in action. Friendly people in Minnesota.


--.  -...  .-

(tap code for civilians)



Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Harry Peterson on June 22, 2013, 09:03:51 PM
I noticed all the cars and RVs and tents too.  I think so many people are showing up is because of the seminary moving out to Virginia.  The people living in the Midwest won't be able to attend ordination ceremonies like they can now.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: magdalena on June 22, 2013, 09:18:40 PM
Quote from: Harry Peterson
I noticed all the cars and RVs and tents too.  I think so many people are showing up is because of the seminary moving out to Virginia.  The people living in the Midwest won't be able to attend ordination ceremonies like they can now.


Yes, I'll miss having it "in my backyard" so to speak.  And I think that the seminary no longer being centrally located will make it harder for those living in the west to attend in the future as well.  Good bye to good memories.  

 :sad:
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 23, 2013, 02:19:38 AM
.


I'm reminded of the heavy rain that preceded the miracle of the sun in
1917.  Everyone's clothes were dirty from the mud, etc., but when the
miracle happened, suddenly all their clothes were clean and as if
freshly laundered.  And the mud all dried -- as if it had not been raining.



Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 23, 2013, 02:26:20 AM
.


"Therefore, the BEST Fr. could do, was pray his Breviary, parked on a PUBLIC road at the same elevation (actually higher) a very short distance away, (feet, not miles) during the ordination of his nephew."


Rather, the "BEST" he could have done would be to arrive in a
disguise, and be up close to see his nephew ordained, and then
leave quietly.



Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: magdalena on June 23, 2013, 04:45:01 AM
Quote from: Neil Obstat
.

[quote:sea leopard said]"Therefore, the BEST Fr. could do, was pray his Breviary, parked on a PUBLIC road at the same elevation (actually higher) a very short distance away, (feet, not miles) during the ordination of his nephew."



Rather, the "BEST" he could have done would be to arrive in a
disguise, and be up close to see his nephew ordained, and then
leave quietly.

[/quote]

Good leadership would have given him a seat up close to see his nephew ordained regardless of their differences.  It's too bad it wasn't so.  
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 23, 2013, 07:29:40 AM
Quote from: magdalena
Quote from: Neil Obstat

Quote from: sea leopard
Therefore, the BEST Fr. could do, was pray his Breviary, parked on a PUBLIC road at the same elevation (actually higher) a very short distance away, (feet, not miles) during the ordination of his nephew.

Rather, the "BEST" he could have done would be to arrive in a
disguise, and be up close to see his nephew ordained, and then
leave quietly.



Good leadership would have given him a seat up close to see his nephew ordained regardless of their differences.  It's too bad it wasn't so.  


You're correct:  it is a most problematic indictment of the ExSPX that
would so ominously prohibit a Society priest in good standing from
being present for his own nephew's ordination.  

It is as though they were trying to set him up for a confrontation.  He
was not there for the purpose of any confrontation.  But they would
try to make it seem like he was.  

This story is not finished.  
The Menzingen-denizens are terrified of the Resistance.



Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: s2srea on June 23, 2013, 09:18:17 AM
God loves Fr. Hewko; he is a Catholic soldier and willing to fight the good fight. Fr. Hewko, in return, never fails to battle when necessary. Had we 500 Fr. Hewkos in the Society, we might have converted the world by now. May God bless him.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Mithrandylan on June 23, 2013, 12:32:15 PM
Quote from: Neil Obstat
.


"Therefore, the BEST Fr. could do, was pray his Breviary, parked on a PUBLIC road at the same elevation (actually higher) a very short distance away, (feet, not miles) during the ordination of his nephew."


Rather, the "BEST" he could have done would be to arrive in a
disguise, and be up close to see his nephew ordained, and then
leave quietly.





His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Skunkwurxsspx on June 23, 2013, 01:40:57 PM
Folks, I find this very sad--that Fr. Hewko was effectively barred from attending his own nephew's ordination.

The "let's just focus on holiness" hierarchy of the Neo-SSPX missed a golden opportunity to show that they actually have a heart. They don't!

This fits right in with the expulsions and the denial of the Sacraments. After all these abuses, they still insist on teaching us a thing or two about "prudence" and "charity"?
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Mithrandylan on June 23, 2013, 01:50:47 PM
Quote from: Skunkwurxsspx
Folks, I find this very sad--that Fr. Hewko was effectively barred from attending his own nephew's ordination.

The "let's just focus on holiness" hierarchy of the Neo-SSPX missed a golden opportunity to show that they actually have a heart. They don't!

This fits right in with the expulsions and the denial of the Sacraments. After all these abuses, they still insist on teaching us a thing or two about "prudence" and "charity"?


Quite right.  New Society is using the same tactics as New Church (which they borrow from masons, commies and liberals).  The gospel of tolerance.  New Church tolerates everyone except those who don't tolerate New Church.  Schismatics, Buddhists, Mohams, Jews-- all under the tent of New Church, all traveling their own road to salvation, except traditionalists.

New Society tolerates indultarians, sedevacantists and even Novus Ordites to attend and communicate at their masses-- but Resistance faithful?  No way!  

Notice the pattern?
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Matthew on June 23, 2013, 02:17:52 PM
Quote from: Neil Obstat

Good leadership would have given him a seat up close to see his nephew ordained regardless of their differences.  It's too bad it wasn't so.

You're correct:  it is a most problematic indictment of the ExSPX that
would so ominously prohibit a Society priest in good standing from
being present for his own nephew's ordination.  

It is as though they were trying to set him up for a confrontation.  He
was not there for the purpose of any confrontation.  But they would
try to make it seem like he was.  

This story is not finished.  
The Menzingen-denizens are terrified of the Resistance.


As well they should be.

In other news, the devil is terrified of the Crucifix.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Machabees on June 23, 2013, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Neil Obstat
.


"Therefore, the BEST Fr. could do, was pray his Breviary, parked on a PUBLIC road at the same elevation (actually higher) a very short distance away, (feet, not miles) during the ordination of his nephew."


Rather, the "BEST" he could have done would be to arrive in a
disguise, and be up close to see his nephew ordained, and then
leave quietly.





His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


Mithrandylan,

Can you please support that?

Thank you.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Mithrandylan on June 23, 2013, 03:10:27 PM
Quote from: Machabees
Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Neil Obstat
.


"Therefore, the BEST Fr. could do, was pray his Breviary, parked on a PUBLIC road at the same elevation (actually higher) a very short distance away, (feet, not miles) during the ordination of his nephew."


Rather, the "BEST" he could have done would be to arrive in a
disguise, and be up close to see his nephew ordained, and then
leave quietly.





His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


Mithrandylan,

Can you please support that?

Thank you.


Fr Hewko said so last night.  I don't have a recording, but others who were there could confirm this.  He had a short, informal conference after mass.

ETA: it may have been recorded, but I do not have a copy.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: stgobnait on June 23, 2013, 03:14:29 PM
 i hope the ordinad was not subject to such a dilemma on the day of his ordination... God bless him...
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Marlelar on June 23, 2013, 08:01:27 PM
Quote from: Mithrandylan
His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


How sad for the nephew to say something like that.  I guess it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Marsha
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Mithrandylan on June 23, 2013, 08:16:56 PM
Quote from: Marlelar
Quote from: Mithrandylan
His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


How sad for the nephew to say something like that.  I guess it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Marsha


The entire situation is sad-- but the impression was not that the nephew did not want Fr Hewko there because he is a resistance priest, but because Fr Hewko would have been refused admittance.  
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Machabees on June 23, 2013, 10:00:18 PM
Quote from: Marlelar
Quote from: Mithrandylan
His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


How sad for the nephew to say something like that.  I guess it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Marsha


In addition, that none of the SSPX ordinates would have been ordained if they did not accept the new doctrine of Menzingen; like last year's situation with the Dominicans and the Capuchins.  

Welcome to the new generation of neo-trads...
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Viva Cristo Rey on June 23, 2013, 10:01:49 PM
Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Skunkwurxsspx
Folks, I find this very sad--that Fr. Hewko was effectively barred from attending his own nephew's ordination.

The "let's just focus on holiness" hierarchy of the Neo-SSPX missed a golden opportunity to show that they actually have a heart. They don't!

This fits right in with the expulsions and the denial of the Sacraments. After all these abuses, they still insist on teaching us a thing or two about "prudence" and "charity"?


Quite right.  New Society is using the same tactics as New Church (which they borrow from masons, commies and liberals).  The gospel of tolerance.  New Church tolerates everyone except those who don't tolerate New Church.  Schismatics, Buddhists, Mohams, Jews-- all under the tent of New Church, all traveling their own road to salvation, except traditionalists.

New Society tolerates indultarians, sedevacantists and even Novus Ordites to attend and communicate at their masses-- but Resistance faithful?  No way!  

Notice the pattern?


You are so right. This is typical novus ordo.  What a disgrace.
THIS IS NOT CATHOLIC.   THIS OFfENDS GOD!

















Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Viva Cristo Rey on June 23, 2013, 10:20:32 PM
Father Hewko is our priest when he comes to Philly.   We thank God and our blessed Mother for providing us with a real Catholic Priest.  Resistance priests are real Catholic priests.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Telesphorus on June 23, 2013, 10:24:22 PM
Fellayites are known to say that disagreement with Bishop Fellay puts one outside of the Church.

For example, the owner of Ignis Ardens said this of Bishop Williamson.

That is a cult mentality.  Bishop Fellay is not the lawful superior of any Catholic.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Viva Cristo Rey on June 24, 2013, 12:02:52 AM
OBEDIENCE TO GOD.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Viva Cristo Rey on June 24, 2013, 12:06:54 AM
Our Lady of Good Success bless and protect Father Hewko, Father Pheiffer and all of us.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 24, 2013, 01:15:43 AM
.



This is turning into a circus.


Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: Neil Obstat

Good leadership would have given him a seat up close to see his nephew ordained regardless of their differences.  It's too bad it wasn't so.

You're correct:  it is a most problematic indictment of the ExSPX that
would so ominously prohibit a Society priest in good standing from
being present for his own nephew's ordination.  

It is as though they were trying to set him up for a confrontation.  He
was not there for the purpose of any confrontation.  But they would
try to make it seem like he was.  

This story is not finished.  
The Menzingen-denizens are terrified of the Resistance.


As well they should be.

In other news, the devil is terrified of the Crucifix.



 :applause:     :roll-laugh1:     :applause:     :laugh2:     :applause:     :laugh1:     :applause:


Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Marlelar
Quote from: Mithrandylan
His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


How sad for the nephew to say something like that.  I guess it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Marsha




I do not agree with this uninformed judgment by Marsha, but I'm
including it here twice because this way the context of the replies
can be kept in order.  I suspect that Marsha would not have said
that if she had known the subsequent statement by Mithrandylan,
below.



Quote


The entire situation is sad-- but the impression was not that the nephew did not want Fr Hewko there because he is a resistance priest, but because Fr Hewko would have been refused admittance.  




His nephew did not want Fr. Hewko to come because he would have
been turned away!  Is there any precedent for such a thing in history?

Fr. Hewko's nephew has received his first real cross even upon his
ordination day.  May God be with him always, as he will carry this
cross for the rest of his life, and Our Lord will give him the strength
to carry it well.

There have been other priests in the Church who have had an early
premonition of future events.



Quote from: Machabees
Quote from: Marlelar
Quote from: Mithrandylan
His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


How sad for the nephew to say something like that.  I guess it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Marsha


In addition, that none of the SSPX ordinates [ordinands] would have been ordained if they did not accept the new doctrine of Menzingen; like last year's situation with the Dominicans and the Capuchins.  

Welcome to the new generation of neo-trads...




Please note:  just like the new tack taken by Newchurch as of the
M.R.S. of John XXIII on October 11th, 1962, the longstanding tradition
of DEFINITIVE words is not to be found in the ExSPX on this issue:  
What, exactly, IS this "New Doctrine of Menzingen?"

I hereby predict, and this is a slam-dunk, that the Menzingen-denizens
will NEVER define just what their new doctrine is.  They cannot, would
not, shall not define it, because to do so would go against everything
they stand for.  






It is their raison d'être

to eschew definition, per se.





But that's not the end of the story.  They have a real problem, and you
may have heard His Eagerness B. Fellay pronounce this on several
occasions in the past 6 or 7 months, that says IT HAS BEEN DIFFICULT.

What has been this 'difficulty' anyway?  Well, I put it to you that the
difficulty is just this:  They Eschew Definition But They Want To Give
The IMPRESSION That They Do Not Eschew Deffinition.  

As Fr. Pfeiffer would say, "That's a problem."  





Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey
Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Skunkwurxsspx
Folks, I find this very sad--that Fr. Hewko was effectively barred from attending his own nephew's ordination.


The "let's just focus on holiness" hierarchy of the Neo-SSPX missed a golden opportunity to show that they actually have a heart.

They don't!







Good one.



Quote
Quote
Quote
This fits right in with the expulsions and the denial of the Sacraments. After all these abuses, they still insist on teaching us a thing or two about "prudence" and "charity"?




Double ouch.  You know, this could be the theme of an entire book.  

Or a movie!  -- But be sure to read the book first!   HAHAHAHAHA



Quote
Quote
Quite right.  New Society is using the same tactics as New Church (which they borrow from masons, commies and liberals).  The gospel of tolerance.  New Church tolerates everyone except those who don't tolerate New Church.  Schismatics, Buddhists, Mohams, Jews-- all under the tent of New Church, all traveling their own road to 'salvation', except traditionalists.

New Society tolerates indultarians, sedevacantists and even Novus Ordites to attend and communicate at their masses-- but Resistance faithful?  No way!  

Notice the pattern?


You are so right. This is typical novus ordo.  What a disgrace.
THIS IS NOT CATHOLIC.   THIS OFFENDS GOD!




It is a pleasure to be amongst thinking Catholics who are not
snowballed by the propaganda machine by-product (B.S.).


Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey
Father Hewko is our priest when he comes to Philly.   We thank God and our blessed Mother for providing us with a real Catholic Priest.  Resistance priests are real Catholic priests.



I think this ought to be a poster or somehow writ large.  
I hope you don't mind, VCR..................







Father Hewko is our priest
when he comes to Philly.  

We thank God and our Blessed Mother
for providing us with a real
Catholic Priest.  

Resistance priests
are real Catholic priests.









 
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 24, 2013, 01:39:57 AM
.


This is a very enduring theme.  

It was going on a year ago, and it's still going on, and there
is no end in sight.  

Meanwhile, far too many Catholics are prone to turn a blind
eye to it, and cannot imagine why anyone would think it's
important.

But it is.  

Last year there were ordinations, both higher and lower
orders, forbidden and/or postponed, AND one of the 4
bishops was excluded from the General Chapter, all
based on this abiding concern for the UNPRONOUNCED
DOCTRINE, effectively, outside of which there is no
salvation.  

And this year, the THREAT of the same thing happening
has been at the root of a most conspicuous scandal --
the prohibition of Fr. Hewko from being present at his own
nephew's ordination..

This story is not over.  

The Menzingen-denizens are terrified of the Resistance.


They do not want their unpronounced doctrine revealed,
and the thought that one of us is going to put it into words
strikes them to the CORE with trepidation.  

Just imagine what the Third Secret of Fatima would do to
them?   Is it any wonder then, that they have abandoned
the appeal to the Pope to consecrate Russia to the
Immaculate Heart of Mary together with all the bishops of
the world?  


Is it any wonder?  I don't think it's any wonder at all.  It's
quite expected, actually.  It's precisely the thing that makes
sense, that they would do this.  It all adds up.


And now, a most conspicuous anomaly is, that His Eagerness
B. Fellay, will be a speaker at the upcoming Conference with
Fr. Gruner and the lineup in September.  



Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Mithrandylan on June 24, 2013, 08:13:25 AM
Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Skunkwurxsspx
Folks, I find this very sad--that Fr. Hewko was effectively barred from attending his own nephew's ordination.

The "let's just focus on holiness" hierarchy of the Neo-SSPX missed a golden opportunity to show that they actually have a heart. They don't!

This fits right in with the expulsions and the denial of the Sacraments. After all these abuses, they still insist on teaching us a thing or two about "prudence" and "charity"?


Quite right.  New Society is using the same tactics as New Church (which they borrow from masons, commies and liberals).  The gospel of tolerance.  New Church tolerates everyone except those who don't tolerate New Church.  Schismatics, Buddhists, Mohams, Jews-- all under the tent of New Church, all traveling their own road to salvation, except traditionalists.

New Society tolerates indultarians, sedevacantists and even Novus Ordites to attend and communicate at their masses-- but Resistance faithful?  No way!  

Notice the pattern?


I shouldn't take too much credit for this statement.  Fr Hewko mentioned the part I've bolded at mass this weekend, I just connected the dots.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 24, 2013, 10:03:29 AM
Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Skunkwurxsspx
Folks, I find this very sad--that Fr. Hewko was effectively barred from attending his own nephew's ordination.

The "let's just focus on holiness" hierarchy of the Neo-SSPX missed a golden opportunity to show that they actually have a heart. They don't!

This fits right in with the expulsions and the denial of the Sacraments. After all these abuses, they still insist on teaching us a thing or two about "prudence" and "charity"?


Quite right.  New Society is using the same tactics as New Church (which they borrow from masons, commies and liberals).  The gospel of tolerance.  New Church tolerates everyone except those who don't tolerate New Church.  Schismatics, Buddhists, Mohams, Jews-- all under the tent of New Church, all traveling their own road to salvation, except traditionalists.

New Society tolerates indultarians, sedevacantists and even Novus Ordites to attend and communicate at their masses-- but Resistance faithful?  No way!  

Notice the pattern?


I shouldn't take too much credit for this statement.  Fr Hewko mentioned the part I've bolded at mass this weekend, I just connected the dots.



You've done a very good thing connecting the dots!  

In a recent sermon, Fr. Pfeiffer said that the very thing that the
SSPX used to do toward Newchurch (regarding supplied jurisdiction)
the Resistance priests now have to do toward the ExSPX!  

What the SSPX used to be (when it remained faithful to the
principles handed down by ABL), now the Resistance has become.

The ExSPX has abandoned this mission, and the Resistance
preserves it.

The ExSPX tolerates indultarians, sedevacantists and even Novus
Ordites to attend and communicate at their masses -- but Resistance
faithful?  Resistance faithful?!?  Resistance Faithful?!?!?

Why.. they're 'outside the Church'!  Why? -Because we said so! We
have the grace of state!  We OWN the 'virtue of prudence'!  Why do
we own the virtue of prudence?  -Because we said so!


They'll put out this message on the one hand, without pronouncing
it, because they know that their FALSE DOCTRINE, once it is
pronounced and defined, becomes an object of ridicule.  They'll put
out this message by implication and innuendo and illusion, by
punishing anyone who opposes it.  

And on the other hand, that is, AT THE SAME TIME that they put
out this false message by innuendo and implication and illusion,
they quote ABL in select passages that suit their aims, such as
him saying, "Far be it from me to appear to be pope!"  And "We
are not setting up a parallel Church!"  

You see:  The ExSPX is not setting up a parallel Church, because
the ExSPX now imitates the Conciliar church in all its subterfuge
and skulduggery.  It's not a parallel Church, it's a mirror image
church -- it's a wanabe church -- it's a "We're Ready To Be
Subsumed" church.



Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 24, 2013, 10:12:14 AM
.


Sorry, I'm getting off topic here.  

This is supposed to be the thread on Fr. Hewko in Winona
this past Friday, in the rain, in the mud, in his cassock.........

........and forbidden from witnessing his nephew's ordination.



Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: stgobnait on June 24, 2013, 10:40:53 AM
I think the topics are all related...
 :sad:
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 24, 2013, 11:14:27 AM
Quote from: stgobnait
I think the topics are all related...
 :sad:


I was afraid  :scared2: you might think that.........  :shocked:

Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: ServusSpiritusSancti on June 24, 2013, 11:55:43 AM
Quote from: Telesphorus
Fellayites are known to say that disagreement with Bishop Fellay puts one outside of the Church.

For example, the owner of Ignis Ardens said this of Bishop Williamson.

That is a cult mentality.  Bishop Fellay is not the lawful superior of any Catholic.


That is true. Fortunately, however, a few months ago IA's owner stated that +Williamson being outside the SSPX didn't mean he was outside the Church. So apparently he's changed his mind.

Speaking of IA, a few months ago a certain pro-Fellay poster there was accusing Bishop Williamson of "heresy" for his remark that the conciliar church is not the Catholic Church (so I guess, according to that logic, the Archbishop was a "heretic" as well, given that he said the same thing). When I brought up the numerous heresies of Benedict XVI to this fellow, he kept beating around the bush and wouldn't admit that Benedict was guilty of even material heresy.

It's amazing to me that so-called "Trads" can accuse a Traditional Catholic Bishop of "heresy" for merely repeating what Archbishop Lefebvre said, but they can't admit that the modernists in Rome are heretics. Such people are liberals, pure liberals.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Matto on June 24, 2013, 12:59:24 PM
Quote from: ServusSpiritusSancti
It's amazing to me that so-called "Trads" can accuse a Traditional Catholic Bishop of "heresy" for merely repeating what Archbishop Lefebvre said, but they can't admit that the modernists in Rome are heretics. Such people are liberals, pure liberals.


How can anyone who knows better think that the modernists in Rome are not heretics. Anyway I think they are heretics, though unlike some, my days as a traditional Catholic were started by reading all about the conciliar heresies on MHFM and other traditional Catholic websites. Let us hope that those who don't think the modernists are heretics just don't know better and are not bad-willed.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Sienna629 on June 24, 2013, 01:21:16 PM
Quote from: Marlelar
Quote from: Mithrandylan
His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


How sad for the nephew to say something like that.  I guess it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Marsha


No, we can't say at this point that it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Perhaps it was in some way relayed to the nephew that his ordination would be in jeopardy if Fr. Hewko came. Why take that chance after all the years of formation? Once he had been ordained, then he could show his colors.

After all, we know from last year that Menzingen would not be above such a tactic. Obviously, from the squad car at the entrance to the grounds, they were prepared for a showdown, if it came to that. I think, given the circuмstances, that quite possibly Fr. Hewko and his nephew decided jointly not to make such a confrontation the focal point of this year's ordination, for the sake of all concerned.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Michael Rooney on June 24, 2013, 01:22:30 PM
Quote from: Marlelar
Quote from: Mithrandylan
His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


How sad for the nephew to say something like that.  I guess it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Marsha


I guess the young priest has a lot to prove.  Having an uncle like Fr Hewko might place him under suspicion of thought crime, so he has to make sure he is seen to be nothing like his errant uncle.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Matto on June 24, 2013, 01:25:00 PM
Quote from: Michael Rooney
I guess the young priest has a lot to prove.  Having an uncle like Fr Hewko might place him under suspicion of thought crime, so he has to make sure he is seen to be nothing like his errant uncle.


Hopoefully he will do the right thing and join Father Hewko.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Napoli on June 24, 2013, 02:18:38 PM
MHFM is traditional?

That's funny. The Dimond brothers are deluded self righteous morons.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Mithrandylan on June 24, 2013, 02:20:21 PM
Quote from: Napoli
MHFM is traditional?

That's funny. The Dimond brothers are deluded self righteous morons.


?

You might have posted that in the wrong thread!
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Matto on June 24, 2013, 02:26:30 PM
Quote from: Napoli
MHFM is traditional?

That's funny. The Dimond brothers are deluded self righteous morons.

Though I don't agree with them on a lot of things, their site was the first traditional Catholic site I saw (and I think it is the traditional Catholic website with the largest audience) so I have a debt due to them for opening my eyes. They are traditional Catholic even though they are wrong, as is Richard Ibranyi, and David Landry and a lot of other people with strange ideas like Griff Ruby and Hutton Gibson and Gerry Matatics and others all of whom are traditional Catholics. I would define traditional Catholics as those who claim to be Catholic while rejecting the New Mass and Vatican II. It is a larger movement than just the SSPX and the CMRI and in it there are a lot of weirdos as well as normal people.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Matto on June 24, 2013, 02:50:32 PM
My definition of Traditional Catholics in my above post was wrong. I would redefine it as one who is not was baptized Catholic and has not fallen into schism, apostasy, or heresy. So some of the people I said were traditional Catholics would not be, though I am not competent to judge which ones (the Dimonds, Griff Ruby, Gerry Matatics) have fallen into those sins which separate one from the Church. Though even those people who have fallen into those sins are still called "traditional Catholics" by many.
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Sienna629 on June 24, 2013, 04:38:38 PM
Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: Napoli
MHFM is traditional?

That's funny. The Dimond brothers are deluded self righteous morons.


?

You might have posted that in the wrong thread!


No, scroll back up the thread to Matto's first post on this thread. (MHFM = Most Holy Family Monastery, run by the Dimond Bros)
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Frances on June 24, 2013, 09:23:04 PM
Neil-  Given his stature, it would be very difficult for Fr. Hewko to disguise himself!  
 :gandalf: :farmer: :geezer: :chef: :dwarf: :cool: Would any of these costumes suit him? :detective: :drillsergeant:
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 25, 2013, 07:40:52 AM
Quote from: Sienna629
Quote from: Marlelar
Quote from: Mithrandylan
His nephew asked that he not come, as they had look-outs for him, and Fr Hewko respected his nephew's request.


How sad for the nephew to say something like that.  I guess it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Marsha


No, we can't say at this point that it shows which side of the fence he is on.

Perhaps it was in some way relayed to the nephew that his ordination would be in jeopardy if Fr. Hewko came. Why take that chance after all the years of formation? Once he had been ordained, then he could show his colors.




Not according to His Eagerness B. Fellay, who [Candlemas 2012] said that
any priest who harbors an intention to change loyalties after he's ordained
would lose any supplied jurisdiction and would not be able to give valid
absolution in the Confessional.  -- Which is ANOTHER example of H.E.'s lies.



Quote
After all, we know from last year that Menzingen would not be above such a tactic. Obviously, from the squad car at the entrance to the grounds, they were prepared for a showdown, if it came to that. I think, given the circuмstances, that quite possibly Fr. Hewko and his nephew decided jointly not to make such a confrontation the focal point of this year's ordination, for the sake of all concerned.




You seem to imply that making a 'confrontation' was EVER a thought
or any kind of option.  Fr. Hewko was much more likely to be concerned
as to how NOT to make any confrontation by his attendance at his own
nephew's ordination.  His desire would have ALWAYS been to be there
for his nephew, and to show his moral support for his big day, and to
congratulate him along with everyone else.  The aspect of 'confrontation'
is ENTIRELY due to how the Menzingen-denizens have been attempting
to enforce any manner of CHANGE in traditional attitudes, deportment,
procedure, way of thinking, outlook, intention ---------- you NAME it!



Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: Frances on June 25, 2013, 11:13:22 AM
Fr. Hewko is a holy priest who does not go looking for a fight.  The idea that he went to Winona for a show-down is silly.  He is a man of peace.  BUT...he is no coward.  When confronted with error or malice, he goes bravely into battle.  I dare say his presence on the fringe of the seminary chased off any devils lurking about. :light-saber:
Title: Fr. Hewko in Winona
Post by: hugeman on June 26, 2013, 10:17:26 AM
Hugh Ross Williamson has a comment to the point of the sheer stupidity
of even thinking the activities in Winona constitute ordinations, or even confer
any powers to consecrate or forgive sins. Recall, firstly, that it is official new SSPX
position that SSPX "priests" get there "mission" from the local Novus Ordo
Bishops. This was elucidated by none other than Fr. LeRoux at last years Auriesville pilgrimage,
and was confirmed again recently in St Mary's in Kansas.
    Secondly, recall that  Bishop Fellay gave his oath to Rat inger and the roman
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that he, Fellay, personally  and for the Society,
accepts  all the heresies of the Second Vatican Council, they accept the new sacraments, they accept the appointment of Pres by ters, and many other horrific modernist ideas.
    Of course, Fellay swore loyalty and obedience to Ratzinger ( and therefore brogoglio ),
And to all the teachings of Ratzinger, Paul VI, John XXIII and JPII .
    So now we come to Winona 2013. Not at all the same seminary founded
By Archbishop Lefebvre in the 1970's and moved from Armada, Michigan and then again from
Ridgefield,Connecticut. Never before had the SSPX ever publicly asserted its union with heretics!
    So. Hugh Ross Williamson wonders, in the Septdmber, 1989 issue of Catholic :
"What possible theory of Order, in the Catholic sense, can apply to such a body, denying the full
Christian faith, denying the sacraments , denying the priesthood and denying the Apostolic Ministry? It is a redcutio ad absurdum without parallel in Christian history that a "Bishop", who is officially not allowed to believe he is a Bishop, should ordain a pres by ter, who is
officially not allowed to believe he is a priest, to administer a sacrament which ( his Bishop Fellay has now agreed with the Novus Ordo ) is officially not a sacrifice, is the One Holy Catholic Apostolic Church in which he is officially not allowed to believe (is  either One, Catholic or Apostolic)."

I wonder what Hugh Ross Williamson would ssy to these traitors in Menzingen today?Saveoursspxdotcom (http://Http://www..com)