Wessex:

It would seem that keeping in with 'the Jєωs' is de rigueur for any organisation that wishes to operate in the world. Paying them homage is the principal religious activity we can engage in and this is demanded by both church and state. If Bergoglio actively promotes this practice and uses his new church as an agent for its dissemination, in no way can he and his new church be regarded as a continuation of the Church, even partially, and should be condemned in toto. If there is anything that separates traditionalism from modernism, this has to be it. No recognition is due to any entity that bases its philosophy on the ascendency of this predatory grouping.

I think I agree essentially with what Wessex is saying.  However, with him it's a matter of correctly deciphering his sometimes tortured and cryptic phraseology.  For example: No recognition is due to any entity that bases its philosophy on the ascendency of this predatory grouping.

I think, loosely paraphrased, he means this: "Hey, if Bergoglio's new church is merely a redux of judaism and a virtual submission to the modern Jєωιѕн agenda, then that "church" can certainly not be recognized as the Catholic Church."  If that's what Wessex means, I'm in!

The Jєωs are certainly a "predatory grouping," and they are definitely in the "ascendancy."  So much so, in fact, that Fellay & Co., in recent years, seem to be flirting with aspects of judaism themselves.