Author Topic: Fr Girouard (Read 19508 times)

wallflower · « **Reply #25 on:** March 27, 2013, 12:37:40 PM »

Wow, what a sermon! :boxer:

vidi · « **Reply #26 on:** March 27, 2013, 01:06:15 PM »

Many of the parishioners are disappointed that the prior Fr. Gerspacher of Langley did not even announce Fr. Girouard's transfer on Palm Sunday!!
Also he didn't come down to the basement for coffee afterwards, which he have been doing every Sunday.

How I wish that he becomes the fighter that his dad was! (dad was a long time parishioner here). :applause:
Fr. G, I pray you that you will speak against the doctrinal preamble.

Sit autem sermo vester est est non non quod autem his abundantius est a malo est.
(St Matthew 5:37)

BrJoseph · « **Reply #27 on:** March 27, 2013, 09:34:01 PM »

http://aveclimmaculee.blogspot.fr/2013/03/m-labbe-girouard-m-labbe-fox-m-labbe.html

Hopefully the Recusant is hard at work.

Beautiful job.

Militia Jesu · « **Reply #28 on:** March 27, 2013, 11:54:17 PM »

Quote from: BrJoseph

http://aveclimmaculee.blogspot.fr/2013/03/m-labbe-girouard-m-labbe-fox-m-labbe.html

Hopefully the Recusant is hard at work.

Beautiful job.

Wow! wow! wow! Oh boy, that was magnificent! Brilliantly done! That's what all of the resistance laity should be encouraging their local priests to do: Speak up boldly cost what it may! Heck with the silence and the false idea of offering oneself as sacrifice in this moment of suffering when in reality they're all acting as cowards.

A little taste of it with a rough translation:

"Saving the SSPX it isn't saving a legal structure whose head is already rallied, but to keep going it alive in the spirit of its founder. Before being a structure, the SSPX is primarily a vocation and a particular mission. Leaving the SSPX is not abandoning the Fraternity. It is instead to free oneself to fully continue the work of Archbishop Lefebvre".

(...)

Q. But if we leave, we leave all the real estate that the faithful have paid in the sweat of their brow, isn't this outrageous?

Yes, it is true that this is grossly unfair that the faithful will suffer and it is a scandal on Menzingen's part. But let us put this drama in light of principle and foundation . Why generous faithful have done this? To do the will of God, for His glory and for the salvation of souls. These generous faithful lose nothing in eternity, God will multiply everything they've given. They don't lose those good deeds, and they are not lost either for all the souls that they have helped save.

In contrast, if one is forbidden to preach the whole truth to keep building and property, we lose sight of what the consequence of the principle and foundation is: all the goods of the earth are only means that helps us to go to heaven. If this is true, to keep the enjoyment of material goods, which are only means, it's not well ordained if you jeopardize the salvation of souls: the physical property becomes an end and is no longer considered as a means. This is a wrong point of view: we do not see things as God sees them, that is to say, as to be used only as a means of salvation, but to never become an end in themselves.

Can't wait for the full translation; meanwhile let's pray so more priests can be faithful to their vocations and their anti-modernist oath; not accepting the sanctions from the Stalin of Menzingen for the simple fact of telling the truth.

Guga · « **Reply #29 on:** March 28, 2013, 07:39:02 AM »

Anyone?