"Acquired legally or otherwise"?  Are they acquiring property illegally?

Remember, lawyers are expensive.  And if what Church Militant says is true, the SSPX will lose.

They ARE trying other avenues of monetary enrichment:

  worst idea ever

I never understood that. Why not raffle a truck or family van/minivan: something practical and useful rather than luxurious? The profit margin may end up better too.

I never understood that. Why not raffle a truck or family van/minivan: something practical and useful rather than luxurious? The profit margin may end up better too.

Mercedes makes big vans.  Maybe luxury car is all they could get from who ever donated the vehicle.).  They even make Mercedes’ rv.   

Motives aside, did Fr. Duverger behave sɛҳuąƖly, over a long period of time, as CM describes, or didn't he?  I am flabbergasted that SSPX parishioners [congregants] in Sanford, who know the reported history of this priest, should have been in attendance at a Mass, no earlier than last Sunday, at which Duverger was the celebrant.  Maybe they're all just ignorant of the many charges brought against this man in the past.  This takes the Society's oft repeated "valid priests" argument to ridiculous extremes.

Only God and Fr. Duverger know.

Sanford has/had other pervert priests in their misdt. Vernoy protected Duverger and even helped enable.  
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/sspx-priest-planning-defamation-lawsuit-against-church-militant-lawyer-says/

Birds of a feather?

I have a feeling congregants in Sanford have been beaten down so much that they don't give a rip anymore.  And it is possible they are told from the pulpit not to believe what they read on the internet, as Fr. Pfeiffer used to tell us.

epiphany:

The 'congregants' must give enough of a rip to show up at Mass with this guy each Sunday.  In any case, it is, apparently, (presumed) validity trumps morality.

I suspect they don't care.  Look at how many congregants dress at mass in Sanford...  

Vernoy and others there would be a problem for me, as well as duverger.

jr1991:
This remark is rather unhinged.  How, exactly, have Voris & Co. "entirely lost their mind?"  Simply amazing!

Yet Jr admits that CM has raised some important issues about the Society.

Both can be and are true.  As I have stated, some of their information is legitimate, but much of it is not, and they have a palpable animosity against Traditional Catholicism in general (and not just the SSPX), and this animosity ... and a desire to create ratings via sensationalism ... have polluted their work.  In a way, they're doing a disservice to exposing the legitimate information by blending it with nonsense and even slander.

I really don't undertand this binary thinking, that either everything CM says must be true or none of it is true.  In their case, some of it is true, but some isn't.  That really shouldn't be so difficult a concept.

Both can be and are true.  As I have stated, some of their information is legitimate, but much of it is not, and they have a palpable animosity against Traditional Catholicism in general (and not just the SSPX), and this animosity ... and a desire to create ratings via sensationalism ... have polluted their work.  In a way, they're doing a disservice to exposing the legitimate information by blending it with nonsense and even slander.

I really don't undertand this binary thinking, that either everything CM says must be true or none of it is true.  In their case, some of it is true, but some isn't.  That really shouldn't be so difficult a concept.

Exactly. In the case of  Duverger and Jassy Jacobs( I think that is her name). It looks like  Duverger was trying to hit on her and get her in bed. However, that does not rise to a criminal offense. Yes, it’s a sin, and Duverger should be reprimanded and held to account. However, CM takes liberties with the issue. Duverger is alleged of more serious wrongdoing in France; however, the authorities have said nothing.

I’m the one who posted the link to the Black Trad. Matters “Spotlight.” In it, I said that I believed the allegations to be true even though CM likes sensationalism to get their point across.

Exactly. In the case of  Duverger and Jassy Jacobs( I think that is her name). It looks like  Duverger was trying to hit on her and get her in bed. However, that does not rise to a criminal offense.

No, CM spun it that way, but it does not look like Father Duverger was grooming her in any way.  He never so much as touched her, and for the longest time he wouldn't even respond to her e-mail (which she complained about).  He asked some bizarre questions in spiritual direction ... which may have been motivated by impure curiosity, or perhaps came from an imbalanced mind, where he fancied himself some kind of psychologist who would "cure" her of her past trauma.  But that's ALL that happened between them.  And I apologize for having to be blunt, but she's not a particularly attractive woman.  I'm sure Father Duverger could have found other options if that's what he was after.

And yet CM smeared him as a "threat to children" ... when he had never acted inappropriately around children.  Men who are interested in women tend not to be interested in children.  So Father Duverger would have a real case for slander, except I think the SSPX would not want all the extra publicity.

Another one who was repeatedly smeared was Father Kenneth Novak, where he was characterized as a home-wrecker, seducing women from their husbands, visiting them "at all hours of the night," etc. ... but there's absolutely zero evidence that there was any wrongdoing of the nature that was implied.