This condemnation is more anti-Webster than anti-Pfeiffer. Very unfair. Fr Hewko indirectly blames +Webster for Fr P's seminary problems, by referring to "OLMC vocations" as if they are legitimate vocations (which is highly questionable). He also condemns +Webster for feeneyism, while not condemning Fr P for the same. Where is the denouncing of Fr P for accepting this consecration? Where is Fr P's guilt in all this? I agree with the overall criticism, but it seems a very one-sided attack.