Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. David Hewko's Statement on the Episcopal Consecration of Fr. Pfeiffer  (Read 5346 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tradman

  • Supporter
Someone please explain specifics about the doubt of this Bishop Webster.   

Offline Tradman

  • Supporter
Someone please explain specifics about the doubt of this Bishop Webster.  
Never mind, I found another thread. 


+
M

JULY 30, 2020
“Then Jesus saith to them: All you shall be scandalized in Me this night. For it is written: ‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be dispersed.’” (St. Matthew 26:31)

This is a brief Statement denouncing the consecration of Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer by “Bishop” Neal Webster. This is a scandal for Holy Mother Church, the true Catholic Resistance and for the vocations at OLMC in Boston, Kentucky.
 
Let it be known that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre would absolutely condemn this action and express, once again, the doubtfulness of the Thuc line of bishops, let alone any connection with Palmar de Troya in Spain, who have elected their own pope decades ago.
 
Let it be known that the priestly line of “Bishop” Webster is from: Bishop Thuc, to Clemente ("Pope" Gregory XVII!), Terrason, Hennenberry, to Webster.
 
The episcopal lineage is from: Bishop Thuc to Des Lauries to McKenna to Slupski to Webster.
 
“Bishop” Neal Webster is also a public supporter of the Feeneyite position on the denial of the Baptism of Blood and Desire (“Votum”;), which contradicts the constant Magisterium of the Church.
 
Once again, let us beg Our Lady of the Holy Rosary to crush the Church’s enemies. Let us hold the clear position of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre always faithful to Mother Church, her Traditional Magisterium, the Traditional Sacraments and the categorical refusal of doubtful sacraments and dangers to the Faith!
 
Once again, we see the sad casualties of a Pope and hierarchy failing in their duty! Indeed, when the shepherd is struck the sheep scatter!
 
In Christ the King,
 
Fr. David Hewko

https://www.therecusant.com/apps/blog/show/48837769

Fr. Hewko told me that he felt the entire thuc line to be valid.

Validity and legitimacy are two different things.  Something can be valid but not legitimate.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
This condemnation is more anti-Webster than anti-Pfeiffer.  Very unfair.  Fr Hewko indirectly blames +Webster for Fr P's seminary problems, by referring to "OLMC vocations" as if they are legitimate vocations (which is highly questionable). He also condemns +Webster for feeneyism, while not condemning Fr P for the same.  Where is the denouncing of Fr P for accepting this consecration?  Where is Fr P's guilt in all this?  I agree with the overall criticism, but it seems a very one-sided attack.