Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 15

Author Topic: Fr. Cordaro not a priest  (Read 16268 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fanny

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #50 on: December 31, 2017, 09:13:56 AM »
Quote from: Last Tradhican on December 31, 2017, 03:55:22 AM
Rat poison is 99.99% nutritious food.
Not the rat poison I use.  
It's mostly gmo corn.
He is a good friend of tetherow and he has been laicised.  That's enough for me.
Logged

Offline CathMomof7

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #51 on: January 03, 2018, 07:45:17 PM »
I live in the Diocese of Scranton.  I still get the Catholic "Lite" due to our time in the NO.  

The Diocese of Scranton is two things: a cesspool for pedophile priests AND a cesspool of corruption.

I know for a 100% fact that many good, traditional, and honest priests are run out, and yes, laicized for nothing immoral at all.

I know personally two priests who have been laicized for doing absolutely nothing wrong.  Nothing.

In fact, my husband, who is a mental health counselor, was hired by one such priest to do an independent mental health evaluation because he had been found by the Bishops council to be mentally unfit.  His mental illness, in case you wonder, was believing that Our Lady of Fatima indeed predicted a chastisement, that the chastisement may well be upon us, and because he was found to be "prepping" for such chastisement.  This is a true story.  The priest was run out of the diocese completely.  He wished to remain a priest but he was laicized and all faculties removed.  He attempted to seek refuge with the SSPX but was refused because he had student loan debt.  Last I heard he was living with family members out west.  

Another priest was laicized for being a whistle blower.  That is also a true story.  I know this man personally.  He is not a creepo, nor a pedophile.  He simply could not tolerate the corruption he saw in the diocese and wherever they sent him, he reported it.  So they accused him of financial impropriety or something, decided he was mentally unfit, and wham, laicized.

So I don't know what Fr. Cordaro was laicized.  It could be simply that he was offering traditional Masses.  I know that, for awhile, he was offering them somewhere because ALWAYS the Catholic "Lite" reminded us of Fr. Cordaro and warned us that the SSPX was in schism.  Always together.  This was around 2004 or 2005.  

I also know for 100% fact that there are priests in the Diocese that are disgusting pervs and have been prosecuted that STILL prey on unsuspecting families.  The Diocese is full of those as well.

BUT unless someone knows the circuмstances of Father Cordaro it is HIGHLY inappropriate to scandalize him in this manner.  I don't know his issue, but I will find out.

I know he was also in Florida.  I know, also, that he was a friend of Fr. Wickens and tried desperately to keep his chapel in New Jersey in the hands of the faithful.

Logged

Offline SeanJohnson

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #52 on: January 03, 2018, 10:09:28 PM »
Quote from: CathMomof7 on January 03, 2018, 07:45:17 PM
I live in the Diocese of Scranton.  I still get the Catholic "Lite" due to our time in the NO.  

The Diocese of Scranton is two things: a cesspool for pedophile priests AND a cesspool of corruption.

I know for a 100% fact that many good, traditional, and honest priests are run out, and yes, laicized for nothing immoral at all.

I know personally two priests who have been laicized for doing absolutely nothing wrong.  Nothing.

In fact, my husband, who is a mental health counselor, was hired by one such priest to do an independent mental health evaluation because he had been found by the Bishops council to be mentally unfit.  His mental illness, in case you wonder, was believing that Our Lady of Fatima indeed predicted a chastisement, that the chastisement may well be upon us, and because he was found to be "prepping" for such chastisement.  This is a true story.  The priest was run out of the diocese completely.  He wished to remain a priest but he was laicized and all faculties removed.  He attempted to seek refuge with the SSPX but was refused because he had student loan debt.  Last I heard he was living with family members out west.  

Another priest was laicized for being a whistle blower.  That is also a true story.  I know this man personally.  He is not a creepo, nor a pedophile.  He simply could not tolerate the corruption he saw in the diocese and wherever they sent him, he reported it.  So they accused him of financial impropriety or something, decided he was mentally unfit, and wham, laicized.

So I don't know what Fr. Cordaro was laicized.  It could be simply that he was offering traditional Masses.  I know that, for awhile, he was offering them somewhere because ALWAYS the Catholic "Lite" reminded us of Fr. Cordaro and warned us that the SSPX was in schism.  Always together.  This was around 2004 or 2005.  

I also know for 100% fact that there are priests in the Diocese that are disgusting pervs and have been prosecuted that STILL prey on unsuspecting families.  The Diocese is full of those as well.

BUT unless someone knows the circuмstances of Father Cordaro it is HIGHLY inappropriate to scandalize him in this manner.  I don't know his issue, but I will find out.

I know he was also in Florida.  I know, also, that he was a friend of Fr. Wickens and tried desperately to keep his chapel in New Jersey in the hands of the faithful.

Somewhat related:

http://sodalitium-pianum.com/romes-new-secret-weapon/
Logged

Offline Last Tradhican

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #53 on: January 04, 2018, 08:12:22 AM »
Quote from: SeanJohnson on January 03, 2018, 10:09:28 PM
Somewhat related:

http://sodalitium-pianum.com/romes-new-secret-weapon/
From the article, and this applies to Fr. Cordera, as no one on this thread has brought forward any proof that he is a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ:

The Problem:
What the whole traditional Catholic world seemed to miss, however, was that according to the new legislation, any priest who converted from conciliarism to traditional Catholicism, and desired to join a traditional community (e.g., SSPX) now faced eventual and inevitable laicization from his diocesan bishop, since in every instance (barring death), all such priests would eventually be considered to have abandoned their public ministry for “a period of more than five consecutive years,” thereby triggering the application of the censure.
Checkmate.
Consequently, since 2009, a double-edged sword has dangled precariously over the head of any priest considering converting to Tradition: If he leaves, he will eventually become subject to laicization after 5 years in Tradition.  More than this, the unthinking public will naturally presume the laicization to have been for grave moral crimes (sex abuse, etc), rather than a conversion to Tradition.
Conversely, real and true degenerates can make the opposite argument: They are falsely accused of grave moral misdemeanors as persecution for their conversion to Tradition!
Logged

Offline Fanny

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #54 on: January 04, 2018, 10:10:59 AM »
Quote from: Last Tradhican on January 04, 2018, 08:12:22 AM
From the article, and this applies to Fr. Cordera, as no one on this thread has brought forward any proof that he is a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ:
No one said he's a pervert.
What was said is that he was kicked out of his order and laicised in 1989, and the warnings from the diocese continue to this day.
It was also said that he is "good friends" with Mr. Tetherow,  a confessed and convicted child pornographer.  
For him to do his own little thing in Scranton, in his own home, is one thing.  For him to be brought to a seminary is quite another.
If I find anything else about him I will post it.  
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 15
« previous next »