Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Cordaro not a priest  (Read 16298 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #35 on: December 24, 2017, 04:01:50 PM »
It says Tetherow is a new sacraments ordained priest, a Novus Ordo priest, and that  he has been laicized by Pope Francis. That answers my two questions.

Conclusion, he may never have been a priest, being as he was "ordained" in the Vatican II church Novus Ordo ordination rite. Now he is laicized by the same Novus Ordo church, so he is not even a "priest".
A priest of the new rite MAY be a legitimate priest.  We don't know for sure, unless you're some version of sedevecanti.  Even if he was legitimately ordained and became "father", he was laicised and, therefore, cannot function as a priest any longer. 
So, it doesn't matter at this point whether or not he was a legitimate priest because he is not now.

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #36 on: December 24, 2017, 04:08:15 PM »
If you want to split hairs over whether they were "priests" in the first place, you are missing the point.

They are all pedophiles.
You are exactly right.  Pedophile or pervert priests are to be forbidden from any public priestly function.  Because Rome is nuts, who enforces that in the traditional world?  Bishops.  If the bishops fail or if we're talking about a rogue priest, the duty falls to the laity, unfortunately.
Laicised priests are no longer priests, whether or not they ever were, and are forbidden from not only any priestly function, but from dressing as a priest or presenting themselves as priests.
Remember, though, that although laicised, Holy Orders, if ever received properly, cannot be removed. 
These are very strange times we live in.


Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #37 on: December 24, 2017, 04:16:05 PM »
People here are still using Rome or a diocese as the yardstick of acceptability. If you do, go back to the mainstream church and do penance for your disobedience and schismatic mentality. Fifty years after the second reformation called Vatican 2, it is surprising some here still cleave to Rome .... which I regard as a fancy gαy club with some priceless works of art.

Fr Cordaro may look like a Mexican bandit in hiding but his simple sermon is spot on about the modern representation of Christmas without Christ. Today's clergymen regard Christmas as a metaphor for 'peace and tolerance', avoiding its real meaning. Father looks like a real priest. Do I need to see spurious pieces of paper saying he is one? I am done with pieces of paper.
You are in danger of losing your faith.
Rome is not a yardstick of acceptability,  but when something correct comes out of it, we should be thankful.  Laicization is one of those things, for only rome can laicise a priest.

Fr. Urutigoity, Mr. Ensey, and Mr. Tetherow, I am sure, sound very Catholic from the pulpit.  For two of them, priests they are not.  But they ARE all good salesmen.
Just because someone walks like a priest and talks like a priest does not mean he IS a priest.  I caution you.

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #38 on: December 24, 2017, 04:24:06 PM »
People here are still using Rome or a diocese as the yardstick of acceptability. If you do, go back to the mainstream church and do penance for your disobedience and schismatic mentality. Fifty years after the second reformation called Vatican 2, it is surprising some here still cleave to Rome .... which I regard as a fancy gαy club with some priceless works of art.

Fr Cordaro may look like a Mexican bandit in hiding but his simple sermon is spot on about the modern representation of Christmas without Christ. Today's clergymen regard Christmas as a metaphor for 'peace and tolerance', avoiding its real meaning. Father looks like a real priest. Do I need to see spurious pieces of paper saying he is one? I am done with pieces of paper.
Don't care what he looks like or what kind of sermon he gives. Couldn't care less what he thinks of VII or the New Mass. Couldn't care less what Rome thinks. I care that he's a known pedophile, and there should be no stink of homos/pedos in tradition. We're not that desperate for a "good sermon." Or his Mass.     

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #39 on: December 24, 2017, 06:37:28 PM »
If you want to split hairs over whether they were "priests" in the first place, you are missing the point.

They are all pedophiles.
Where does it say Cordera is a pedophile I missed that. Why didn't she say that in the first place?