Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Cordaro not a priest  (Read 11457 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Smedley Butler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1334
  • Reputation: +551/-1531
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #30 on: December 24, 2017, 12:33:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://www.dioceseofscranton.org/statement-regarding-the-status-of-reverend-carlos-
    urrutigoity/

    Notice re: Diocese's 2014 objection to Fr. U incardination in Paraguay and commitment to reporting child sɛҳuąƖ abuse. 


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #31 on: December 24, 2017, 12:38:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://www.dioceseofscranton.org/notice-regarding-dismissal-of-gabriel-tetherow/
    Tetherow's notice: "Has been removed from the clerical state..."
    It says Tetherow is a new sacraments ordained priest, a Novus Ordo priest, and that  he has been laicized by Pope Francis. That answers my two questions.

    Conclusion, he may never have been a priest, being as he was "ordained" in the Vatican II church Novus Ordo ordination rite. Now he is laicized by the same Novus Ordo church, so he is not even a "priest".

    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24


    Offline Smedley Butler

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1334
    • Reputation: +551/-1531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #32 on: December 24, 2017, 12:49:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If you want to split hairs over whether they were "priests" in the first place, you are missing the point.

    They are all pedophiles.

    Offline Wessex

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1311
    • Reputation: +1953/-361
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #33 on: December 24, 2017, 01:26:50 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!2
  • People here are still using Rome or a diocese as the yardstick of acceptability. If you do, go back to the mainstream church and do penance for your disobedience and schismatic mentality. Fifty years after the second reformation called Vatican 2, it is surprising some here still cleave to Rome .... which I regard as a fancy gαy club with some priceless works of art.

    Fr Cordaro may look like a Mexican bandit in hiding but his simple sermon is spot on about the modern representation of Christmas without Christ. Today's clergymen regard Christmas as a metaphor for 'peace and tolerance', avoiding its real meaning. Father looks like a real priest. Do I need to see spurious pieces of paper saying he is one? I am done with pieces of paper. 

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #34 on: December 24, 2017, 03:54:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Did Fr. Pfeiffer send out a summons for all laicized pedophile priests to reportto Boston, KY? Especially any once with the SSJ
    Looks that way, doesn't It?
    Why do those seminarians stay?  Don't they realize they are ruining their reputations?  


    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #35 on: December 24, 2017, 04:01:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • It says Tetherow is a new sacraments ordained priest, a Novus Ordo priest, and that  he has been laicized by Pope Francis. That answers my two questions.

    Conclusion, he may never have been a priest, being as he was "ordained" in the Vatican II church Novus Ordo ordination rite. Now he is laicized by the same Novus Ordo church, so he is not even a "priest".
    A priest of the new rite MAY be a legitimate priest.  We don't know for sure, unless you're some version of sedevecanti.  Even if he was legitimately ordained and became "father", he was laicised and, therefore, cannot function as a priest any longer. 
    So, it doesn't matter at this point whether or not he was a legitimate priest because he is not now.

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #36 on: December 24, 2017, 04:08:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If you want to split hairs over whether they were "priests" in the first place, you are missing the point.

    They are all pedophiles.
    You are exactly right.  Pedophile or pervert priests are to be forbidden from any public priestly function.  Because Rome is nuts, who enforces that in the traditional world?  Bishops.  If the bishops fail or if we're talking about a rogue priest, the duty falls to the laity, unfortunately.
    Laicised priests are no longer priests, whether or not they ever were, and are forbidden from not only any priestly function, but from dressing as a priest or presenting themselves as priests.
    Remember, though, that although laicised, Holy Orders, if ever received properly, cannot be removed. 
    These are very strange times we live in.

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #37 on: December 24, 2017, 04:16:05 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • People here are still using Rome or a diocese as the yardstick of acceptability. If you do, go back to the mainstream church and do penance for your disobedience and schismatic mentality. Fifty years after the second reformation called Vatican 2, it is surprising some here still cleave to Rome .... which I regard as a fancy gαy club with some priceless works of art.

    Fr Cordaro may look like a Mexican bandit in hiding but his simple sermon is spot on about the modern representation of Christmas without Christ. Today's clergymen regard Christmas as a metaphor for 'peace and tolerance', avoiding its real meaning. Father looks like a real priest. Do I need to see spurious pieces of paper saying he is one? I am done with pieces of paper.
    You are in danger of losing your faith.
    Rome is not a yardstick of acceptability,  but when something correct comes out of it, we should be thankful.  Laicization is one of those things, for only rome can laicise a priest.

    Fr. Urutigoity, Mr. Ensey, and Mr. Tetherow, I am sure, sound very Catholic from the pulpit.  For two of them, priests they are not.  But they ARE all good salesmen.
    Just because someone walks like a priest and talks like a priest does not mean he IS a priest.  I caution you.


    Offline Smedley Butler

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1334
    • Reputation: +551/-1531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #38 on: December 24, 2017, 04:24:06 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • People here are still using Rome or a diocese as the yardstick of acceptability. If you do, go back to the mainstream church and do penance for your disobedience and schismatic mentality. Fifty years after the second reformation called Vatican 2, it is surprising some here still cleave to Rome .... which I regard as a fancy gαy club with some priceless works of art.

    Fr Cordaro may look like a Mexican bandit in hiding but his simple sermon is spot on about the modern representation of Christmas without Christ. Today's clergymen regard Christmas as a metaphor for 'peace and tolerance', avoiding its real meaning. Father looks like a real priest. Do I need to see spurious pieces of paper saying he is one? I am done with pieces of paper.
    Don't care what he looks like or what kind of sermon he gives. Couldn't care less what he thinks of VII or the New Mass. Couldn't care less what Rome thinks. I care that he's a known pedophile, and there should be no stink of homos/pedos in tradition. We're not that desperate for a "good sermon." Or his Mass.     

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #39 on: December 24, 2017, 06:37:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If you want to split hairs over whether they were "priests" in the first place, you are missing the point.

    They are all pedophiles.
    Where does it say Cordera is a pedophile I missed that. Why didn't she say that in the first place?
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #40 on: December 24, 2017, 08:40:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Where does it say Cordera is a pedophile I missed that. Why didn't she say that in the first place?
    I don't know if he is one or not.  That is why I didn't say it.
    I don't know why he was kicked out of his order.  I don't know why the diocese calls him "Mr.", except the only justification is that he was laicised.  
    I DO know that he is good friends with pervert priests.  And i also know that, generally speaking, the only reason priests are laicised since vat II is if it is moral in nature.

    Better to stay away.


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #41 on: December 24, 2017, 09:15:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pure emotionalism, the OP does not know if the person was laicized, does not know why he is called Mr., only knows to stay away.

    I'm out of this one.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #42 on: December 24, 2017, 09:42:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't care why.  "he is forbidden to function as a priest in the Roman Catholic Church."  He is forbidden means he is forbidden.  It means he was laicised.  It does not mean he can continue to dress as and present himself as a legitimate priest.  His sacraments to the faithful are not legitimate.  


    Offline happenby

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2768
    • Reputation: +1077/-1637
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #43 on: December 26, 2017, 11:04:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Again, for those who cannot read, Fr. Cordaro was not only removed from the Oblates of St. Joseph in 1989, but the diocese of Scranton also said that he is forbidden to perform the functions of a priest. And yet, he is saying mass in KY. Now, whether Fr/Mr was re-ordained is necessary for the wise to prove before considering going to any of his masses.  Has he received faculties from a Traditional bishop?  If anyone knows, please post the information.

    I'm not interested in beating a dead horse, or muddy anyone's name, I want facts, in order to assist others who are asking or may be confused.        

    Offline Smedley Butler

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1334
    • Reputation: +551/-1531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
    « Reply #44 on: December 27, 2017, 10:42:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The people willing to look to excuse these priests is bizarre. Right-thinking Catholics know to flee from this filth. What part has Christ with Belial? Even if Belial says he loves the Latin Mass and hates VII? Wake up!