Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Cordaro not a priest  (Read 16467 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MaterDominici

  • Mod
  • Supporter
Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #20 on: December 21, 2017, 01:48:43 AM »

Quote
on August 8, 1989
Sounds like he's been independent for a long time. I'm sure someone knows what he's been up to for the past two and a half decades. I'd want to have more verification that he was actually laicized before officially writing him off, but I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case as good Traditional priests don't just pop up out of nowhere.

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #21 on: December 24, 2017, 04:00:49 AM »
I guess OLMC will let anyone say mass.

And, just for the record, it's Cordaro, not Cadaro.  I guess YouTube has a countdown editor, too.  Either that or "10 year old girl productions" doesn't know how to spell.




Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #22 on: December 24, 2017, 04:49:24 AM »
Wonder why he left Florida...
 
  https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.chapeloftheholyfamily.org/uploads/7/6/7/1/7671717/1-29-12.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwim3tKQtqLYAhWMJMAKHaa4BS04ChAWCCgwAg&usg=AOvVaw04Z3ggd6y25Aunogrt-Fvn
 
 
 "Dismissed by the oblates of st. Joseph"
  https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.miamiarchdiocese.org/Atimo_s/news/Bulletin_100505.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjH0cL_tqLYAhUGzoMKHX1mA10QFgg3MAU&usg=AOvVaw1vM-SN1A49deTRwYsJGvcP

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #23 on: December 24, 2017, 06:56:01 AM »
From an impartial observer's view, by the scattered, disjointed "evidence" posted here by the OP it appears that she has a personal issue with this Fr. Cordero.  

Re: Fr. Cordaro not a priest
« Reply #24 on: December 24, 2017, 07:05:13 AM »
First and foremost what I look for in a priest is whether he was ordained in the old rite by a bishop consecrated in the old formula, because I have serious doubts about whether those ordained by a new formula bishop are really priests. The OP mentions nothing about it, and focuses on a Novus Ordo bishop's dismissal of this priest. The fact that she mentions that the SSPX is accepted by Rome now, tells me her mindset is different than mine, that she only goes to priests or "priests" in union with Rome.

Therefore, for me, thus far this entire thread does not even answer the first question about this priest