Author Topic: Fr. Chazals Conference on Ambrose (Read 22894 times)

Matthew · « **Reply #90 on:** October 18, 2015, 11:03:16 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

That these two "end up paired together" drives me to imaginary excesses which I try desperately to shake off. Because all that comes to mind is a rather corpulent "Don Quixote" in religious attire accompanied by his "Sancho" in shades, who, far from helping us to get through hard times, promises to thrust some of us more deeply into them.

LOL...and I really mean it!

I had something I was going to post, but completely forgot it after reading this.

Franciscan Solitary · « **Reply #91 on:** October 19, 2015, 03:19:55 AM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

F. Solitary:
Quote
We are simply living in a time when the old comforts of the Catholic bourgeoisie are falling away and the previous dominance of comedy is having to cede its primacy to the tragic heroism and epic poetry of a Catholic warrior nobility that is being reborn around us. Whether or not we somewhat flippantly choose to dismiss this as "madness", the dawn grows brighter despite every best effort we make to cling to a former bourgeois respectability that is dead.

May I ask you to explain a bit more prosaically, in words that I can understand, the following please:

1) Who are, or who were the "Catholic bourgeoisie?'

2) What exactly is this previous "dominance of comedy?"

And now that this old bourgeoisie has lost its "primacy,"..

3) What is this new "Catholic warrior nobility" which has been reborn in our times? Can you put a name to it, and identify a few of its members to us?

4) And just how does this emerging class of warrior bring promise of a brighter dawn?

Pertinent questions with only some very loose connection to the thread's theme. Sorry about the vagueness but these historical issues are by their nature more or less vague. Hence the poetic imagination must also enter in and be applied.

"The Catholic bourgeoisie" is the pragmatic trend that increasingly dominated Catholicism after the lifting of the strict ban on usury circa 1760. Sometimes they have been labelled "the diplomats". From the accession of King George III in 1760 the global policy of the Vatican was practically joined at the hip to the British Empire, pretty much until the K.G.B.-inspired palace coup that installed Paul VI in 1962-63. This was the actual age of genuine private enterprise or historic capitalism and corresponded with the socio-economic and cultural ascendency of the bourgeoisie in tandem with a predominantly Catholic European and American aristocracy. To summarise, "the Catholic bourgeoisie" could be described as our leadership during the incomparably successful pragmatic, diplomatic and effectively Jesuitical phase of Catholicism that dated from circa 1760 to 1960. It was the rich golden autumn of historic Christianity.

The "dominance of comedy" is actually more easy to define. It's simply "decadence", a cultural phase in civilisations of harvest, sometimes known as an "Age of the Epigons". This cultural atmosphere is the air that diplomats and the bourgeoisie breathe. The delights of comedy are the main reason most men desire to make money in the first place. Wine, women and song; we know the routine. Problem being, of course, that it's usually only a very brief routine and the comedy fades away.

In any event WWII finally broke that golden time for Catholics and the V2 and its nightmarish aftermath sank it to the bottom of the sea. In its place arose Catholic Tradition, in fact another name for historic Catholic Nationalism. Archbishop Lefebvre's hero was Marshall Pétain for a reason.

Who exactly are the prominent Catholic Nationalists at the present time? We haven't far to seek: French President-in-waiting Marine Le Pen, the flourishing though fragmented Italian Right, the Spanish Francoist and Carlist elites that are patiently waiting to again compete seriously for power in Madrid once the Neo-Liberal factions have sufficiently disintegrated, the numerous National German cadres in Berlin whose popularity in on the upswing and who will re-arm once Merkel goes and more generally the many Catholic Nationalist organizations throughout the Catholic lands that grow as Neo-Liberalism disintegrates. Then there are the Protestant Nationalist organizations (the real ones that are not Masonic) that are quite dependent on the much more numerous and powerful Catholics, but that do exist mostly in Ulster, Scandinavia and the American South. They will have to follow the Catholic Nationalist lead because that is the objective environment they are in. And in the South their most fervent members are usually Catholics already.

It's useful to grasp that the present time resembles the 1920s and that the political and economic differences from then are mostly in our favor. In particular there is nothing like the Communist Movement to oppose us now. The Neo-Liberals are greatly weaker than the Stalinists and their many Masonic allies were then. And also Judaism has triumphed, been tried and found wanting. So Jewry also holds none of the moral high ground they held so powerfully in the '20s. Now we are the ones occupying that moral high ground.

So a predominantly Traditional Catholic Nationalist warrior élite is gathering as the Neo-Liberal forces and structures disintegrate. Therefore whence optimism about the prospects? In particular, because the Catholics enjoy certain advantages that are quite dramatic. Our ancestors were rarely lazy and they have achieved magnificent results pulverising every heresy that has raised its ugly head against Roman Catholicism. Two thousand years of extremely effective heresy eradication now produces some awesomely pleasant results for us. Basically dying Neo-Liberalism is all that remains of our once horrifically numerous spiritual enemies. As Neo-Liberalism falls apart nothing remains of the serious historic enemies of Catholicism but powerless and pulverised dust in the wind.

For example, the Catholic minorities in Russia and Syria are influential (in Moscow the Catholics attending Easter Mass outnumber the Orthodox attending on their Easter), exceptionally loyal to Tradition and are essentially responsible for the decisive military victories Russia and Syria are presently enjoying in the Greater Holy Land (because the best schools in both countries are good Catholic schools). This is shifting the geo-political balance against Zionist Israel, as can be seen on the streets of Old Jerusalem. Now the liberation of the Holy City (in fact by a Catholic-inspired Axis of Resistance) is only a matter of time.

Obviously these vast and difficult topics are only covered here briefly and somewhat cryptically. The present Catholic advantages are too numerous to cover effectively in a CathInfo blog comment. And any effective grasp of history requires poetic imagination because history is not an exact science: We need to be able to see the forest through the trees to see the true magnificence of the forest.

Finally, where is this dawn light about which an eccentric Franciscan dares to write? Well, contemplate Our Lady of Guadalupe Monastery some eight miles north of Silver City, New Mexico. The holy light of that monastery is the light in which the rising élite of Traditional Catholic Nationalist warriors coheres. And will continue to cohere forever and ever, Worlds Without End.

Mr. Hollingsworth: Hope this serves a bit to suggest some more complete answers to these virtually limitless questions. The errors you find in my comments are entirely mine, whereas any glimmers of glory you might find contained within belong, needless to say, entirely to God Alone.

P.S.: And your latest comment: Glad not to grate. But how does Catholic chivalry and knightly honor "slip away"? Where there is Christ, there is always chivalry and knightly honor. As for the windmills, haven't you noticed that victory in battle has everything to do with going against the odds? The language is poetic: "Tilting at windmills" means carrying one's Cross bravely and against the odds. It means doing one's duty whether others offer praise or blame for it. When we can only carry our Cross to the applause of others, then our Cross is probably a little too light for us.

As for that image of corpulence and shades, please remove that image from your mind. This solitary fasts regularly and best to avoid the noonday sun altogether. Also Don Quixote wasn't a nut; Descartes was a nut, but not Don Quixote. And Sancho never wore shades; he wore a sensible brimmed hat.

Mr. Matthew: Please do completely forget and... Never mind.

JPM · « **Reply #92 on:** October 19, 2015, 09:20:09 AM »

Quote from: Franciscan Solitary

Quote from: hollingsworth
Franciscan Solitary:
Quote
Consider that if Fr. Luther had received a few hard thwacks early on, then a third and more of the German Nation might not have had to be slaughtered by Catholics in the Thirty Years War. This "Ambrose" scandal is a deadly serious matter. We had best put some Catholic sense into the gifted and eloquent Fr. Pfeiffer, before some terrible Neo-Reformation ignites in the hills of Kentucky.

Let's hope and pray Fr. Hewko is staying at Boston because he is just the man to accomplish true solicitude for our potential Martin Luther in the American Deutschland. Because one thing is already certain: Time will soon tell whether a False Resistance may be slouching towards Boston to be born..

In the time of Luther, the Catholic Church, if my reading informs me at all, was not in a very healthy state. There was widespread corruption, and much clerical abuse. Many priests lived in a state of concubinage. Luther was correct in confronting the sale of Indulgences, ostensibly for the purpose of delivering souls from Purgatory and Hell. The forbidden practice of usury was carried on actively, if you believe such authors as Michael Hoffman. If the Church Herself had received a "few hard thwacks early on," the tragedy of the Reformation might have been averted.

Personally, I am not worried about "some terrible Neo-Reformation" igniting in "the hills of Kentucky." At worst, IMO, the Boston bunch will become little more than a tiny, insignificant sect of Baptist snake handlers. Fr. Pfeiffer is hardly what I would call "eloquent." Luther, for certain, had a certain gifted eloquence. His writings and sermons are published and read to this very day. Does anyone honestly think that Father P's sermons are worthy of preservation for the next four hundred years? Please! Fr. Pfeiffer, sorry to say, is just a poor, confused priest, who, it seems, draws great inspiration from a clever layman, the state of whose soul is indeed suspect.

Mr. Hollingsworth,

The Church was innocent then and She is innocent now. Perhaps you forget that the real movers and shakers of these events are not human. Fr. Pfeiffer has not yet abandoned the One True Faith. He is as eloquent as he wants to be. Evidently you have not seen the extraordinary impact he has on his audiences. We underestimate Fr. Pfeiffer at our peril.

"Ambrose" is no Baptist snake handler. He is the close friend of Nixon and the heart and soul of the Pentagon. He is the embodiment of the American National Security State, an Arch-Heresiarch of Modernism and harbinger of the Armies of Hell. "Ambrose" is the spiritual essence of the on-going Ukrainian War between the great powers and can, as he wants, summon immense mountain ranges of weaponry and death. He claims to have the highest connections on earth and indeed he does.

The American National Security State is in its death throws. It is losing its grip on the Holy City of Jerusalem. The prospect of a Neo-Reformation that would blaze through the American South and German Heartland is by no means a mere fanciful vision. It is in truth the last best hope of the American Empire.

We should pray for Fr. Pfeiffer, Fr. Hewko and, perhaps most of all, for Pablo. Because it is Pablo, the Sorcerer's Apprentice of North American Catholicism, who at the moment is all-too-literally holding in his weak trembling hands the actual One Ring of Power.

Let us pray very very hard now for Poor Pablo the most hapless of Mexicans:

I'll have what he's having.

JPM · « **Reply #93 on:** October 19, 2015, 09:32:05 AM »

Quote from: Franciscan Solitary

Finally, where is this dawn light about which an eccentric Franciscan dares to write? Well, contemplate Our Lady of Guadalupe Monastery some eight miles north of Silver City, New Mexico. The holy light of that monastery is the light in which the rising élite of Traditional Catholic Nationalist warriors coheres. And will continue to cohere forever and ever, Worlds Without End.

Put. Tolkien. Down.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #94 on:** October 19, 2015, 12:24:12 PM »

OK, Franciscan, you've got my attention. I have decided that you may have something to say to us all. When time permits, I'll go over your last post with greater attention. Meanwhile, you wrote something earlier which I quote below:

Quote

"Ambrose" is no Baptist snake handler. He is the close friend of Nixon and the heart and soul of the Pentagon. He is the embodiment of the American National Security State, an Arch-Heresiarch of Modernism and harbinger of the Armies of Hell. "Ambrose" is the spiritual essence of the on-going Ukrainian War between the great powers and can, as he wants, summon immense mountain ranges of weaponry and death. He claims to have the highest connections on earth and indeed he does.

You seem to portray "Ambrose," or the idea of "Ambrose," as much more than a bishop for hire, or a phony mail order bishop, or something other than a desperate attempt on the part of Pfeiffer & Co. to achieve legitimacy without having to go through the proper Episcopal channels. So, what do you mean "the close friend of Nixon?" That must be a friendship in the figurative sense, since Nixon molders in the grave. If "Ambrose" is the "heart and soul of the Pentagon," he must for you represent some kind of American geopolitical imperial idea. The "embodiment," you say, of the "American National Security State." Wow! You leave my poor intellect in the dust, panting to keep up, but doing so unsuccessfully. Right now, quite seriously, I am forced to view you in one of two ways. Either, you are quite sane, and in total possession of your intellectual faculties. Or, you are, perhaps, a poor demented, though intelligent, soul, sitting in a terry cloth robe at a computer in the day room of some kind of mental health facility. Whatever and whoever you are, I'm willing to listen to more of what you have to say. If "Ambrose" is other than a snake oil salesman, and fits into some larger picture, I, for one, would like to know. Thank you in advance for your response. :confused1:

JPM · « **Reply #95 on:** October 19, 2015, 12:35:03 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

OK, Franciscan, you've got my attention. I have decided that you may have something to say to us all. When time permits, I'll go over your last post with greater attention. Meanwhile, you wrote something earlier which I quote below:

Quote
"Ambrose" is no Baptist snake handler. He is the close friend of Nixon and the heart and soul of the Pentagon. He is the embodiment of the American National Security State, an Arch-Heresiarch of Modernism and harbinger of the Armies of Hell. "Ambrose" is the spiritual essence of the on-going Ukrainian War between the great powers and can, as he wants, summon immense mountain ranges of weaponry and death. He claims to have the highest connections on earth and indeed he does.

You seem to portray "Ambrose," or the idea of "Ambrose," as much more than a bishop for hire, or a phony mail order bishop, or something other than a desperate attempt on the part of Pfeiffer & Co. to achieve legitimacy without having to go through the proper Episcopal channels. So, what do you mean "the close friend of Nixon?" That must be a friendship in the figurative sense, since Nixon molders in the grave. If "Ambrose" is the "heart and soul of the Pentagon," he must for you represent some kind of American geopolitical imperial idea. The "embodiment," you say, of the "American National Security State." Wow! You leave my poor intellect in the dust, panting to keep up, but doing so unsuccessfully. Right now, quite seriously, I am forced to view you in one of two ways. Either, you are quite sane, and in total possession of your intellectual faculties. Or, you are, perhaps, a poor demented, though intelligent, soul, sitting in a terry cloth robe at a computer in the day room of some kind of mental health facility. Whatever and whoever you are, I'm willing to listen to more of what you have to say. If "Ambrose" is other than a snake oil salesman, and fits into some larger picture, I, for one, would like to know. Thank you in advance for your response. :confused1:

Don't encourage him.

Franciscan Solitary · « **Reply #96 on:** October 19, 2015, 09:21:13 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

OK, Franciscan, you've got my attention. I have decided that you may have something to say to us all. When time permits, I'll go over your last post with greater attention. Meanwhile, you wrote something earlier which I quote below:

Quote
"Ambrose" is no Baptist snake handler. He is the close friend of Nixon and the heart and soul of the Pentagon. He is the embodiment of the American National Security State, an Arch-Heresiarch of Modernism and harbinger of the Armies of Hell. "Ambrose" is the spiritual essence of the on-going Ukrainian War between the great powers and can, as he wants, summon immense mountain ranges of weaponry and death. He claims to have the highest connections on earth and indeed he does.

You seem to portray "Ambrose," or the idea of "Ambrose," as much more than a bishop for hire, or a phony mail order bishop, or something other than a desperate attempt on the part of Pfeiffer & Co. to achieve legitimacy without having to go through the proper Episcopal channels. So, what do you mean "the close friend of Nixon?" That must be a friendship in the figurative sense, since Nixon molders in the grave. If "Ambrose" is the "heart and soul of the Pentagon," he must for you represent some kind of American geopolitical imperial idea. The "embodiment," you say, of the "American National Security State." Wow! You leave my poor intellect in the dust, panting to keep up, but doing so unsuccessfully. Right now, quite seriously, I am forced to view you in one of two ways. Either, you are quite sane, and in total possession of your intellectual faculties. Or, you are, perhaps, a poor demented, though intelligent, soul, sitting in a terry cloth robe at a computer in the day room of some kind of mental health facility. Whatever and whoever you are, I'm willing to listen to more of what you have to say. If "Ambrose" is other than a snake oil salesman, and fits into some larger picture, I, for one, would like to know. Thank you in advance for your response. :confused1:

Mr. Hollingsworth,

Can't say whether it's good or bad news exactly, but I assure you that many who've known me the most closely have over the years consistently mentioned to me that I have struck them as, to quote one hypercritical film-maker from Hollywood I know who spontaneously blurted out: "you are the most sane person I've ever met in my life!" Just saying. Anyhow, definitely no terry cloth or institution. Too eccentric, yes. Certifiable, no.

You bring up "big" questions and this is another one. How to explain? For example, back when Nixon was in office this Franciscan happened to know several close family and friends of several of the higher men in that administration, such as the Attorney General at the time. Anyhow, can assure you that once a "friend of Nixon", then always a "friend of Nixon" irregardless of whether Nixon is on this or that side of the grave. Seriously, those are connections that remain in the proverbial "higher circles". Just are!

"Ambrose" (or whoever he may be) mentions in one of those recent videos that include him that he was (or, again, more accurately "is") a "friend of Nixon" and then immediately emphasises his Pentagon connections. Well, however that may seem please rest assured that that is about as clear a red flag as there is that he is trumpeting with megaphone that he is a "Washington Insider" in spades. Is that only meaningless "Washington Speak"? No! He is one of those permanent "friends of Nixon" and is in with the Pentagon bigwigs big time and on steroids, so to speak. Also Colorado where he resides is among the most popular Pentagon retirement areas. Therefore: "Hint, hint". "Ambrose" may be no more a legitimate or valid bishop of the Church of Rome than you or I, but he is most definitely a "Washington Insider" on as high a level of "clearance" as that gets on this planet. This writer knows the style, knows the look, can smell it light years away. In that respect "Ambrose" is genuine, all-too-genuine.

So we have dipped our toes into this morass of evil. It gets deeper, much deeper. He repeatedly mentions Cardinal Josyf Slipyj. He was a wonderful Cardinal so what could possibly be the problem? Again, red flags and trumpets on megaphones. Are the U.S. and Russia in a New Cold War over Ukraine for nothing? Why would "Ambrose" be so important to the Pentagon higher ups to be their Number One Man in the Uniate episcopacy of the Ukraine, ground zero of the currently blazing U.S.-Russia Cold War? Cardinal Slipyj, that's why. "Ambrose" has made himself, legally or not, the heir to the good Cardinal's connections and very great power, due to the fact (again here in flashing neon with megaphones blaring) that Cardinal Slipyj was nothing less than the spiritual father to the revered by the Ukrainian people (as in one who definitely walked on water and if one publicly disagrees with that some pious Ukrainian actually is going to shoot one's brains out quick pronto) late Stepan Bandera.

Stephan Bandera. He is in fact the full equivalent in Ukraine to everything St. Joan of Arc is in France. Does he walk on water, float above clouds and appear to ecstatic crowds in their hundreds of thousands on mountain tops? At present that is exactly what he is doing in West Ukraine in and around Lviv, the capital city of West Ukraine. In truth Mr. Bandera was a great martyr to the faith αssαssιnαtҽd by the K.G.B. in 1959. He was also Hitler's favourite East European. famed leader of the Ukrainian S.S. and organiser of the heroic uprising against the Red Army in Ukraine that raged on well into the 1960s.

One fears that St. Joan had her close associate the infamous monster Gilles de Rais and Cardinal Slipyj now has his "Ambrose". Gilles de Rais and "Ambrose" are birds of a feather, demons following in the footsteps of the greatest warrior saints. At present Obama is obsessed by one thing: Ukraine. Therefore Secretary of Defense Carter and the Pentagon are also obsessed by that same one thing: Ukraine. Stephan Bandera is the Ukraine. "Ambrose" is the living representative and heir on earth (legal or not) to Stephen Bandera's chosen priest and spiritual father: Cardinal Slipyj.

Obama has bet the farm (i.e., the American National Security State) on beating the Russkies in Ukraine. "Ambrose" is Obama's best bet on using the Ukrainians as cannon fodder in Obama's desperate gamble to shatter the Russian Federation on the blood-drenched battlefields of the Ukraine.

Meanwhile "Ambrose" just happens to show up in Boston? When pigs fly. Fr. Pfeiffer is impressive, and otherwise the presence of Fr. Pfeiffer wouldn't have moved "Ambrose" to spend his precious time and effort in little Boston at the back of beyond. "Ambrose" did not go to Boston to be with Pablo. "Ambrose" can pick a winner and he knows clear as day that Fr. Pfeiffer has the potential to set the South on fire -- with a little help from his "new friends". A Southern Neo-Reformation would be the perfect backdrop to the Ukrainian War that could hurl the Ukrainians all the way to the Kremlin and the Pacific Ocean. Good Hollingsworth, the sons and grandsons of the Ukrainian S.S., now on fire with visions of Stephan Bandera, are fully capable of doing just that. Not saying that's good or bad. Just saying.

One should note that the creator of the American National Security State, Andrew Marshall, who is also the mentor of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, W. Bush and Jeb, happens to a rather demented protege of Stephan Bandera and therefore, beyond any shadow of doubt, knows "Ambrose" well. Since August 1945, when he arrived at the Pentagon in a German military helicopter, Andrew Marshall has been the foremost proponent in the Pentagon of the military doctrine of the late Third Reich. He is the actual model for the lead character in the famous movie "Dr. Strangelove". The elderly Andrew Marshall is, in fact, the real-life Dr. Strangelove.

At this point this lowly Franciscan should mention that in recent lowly personal correspondence with the best friend of the previous Secretary of Defense, which source should not be named here because he is currently the actual leader of one of the two main power factions in the Pentagon (the Catholic/Protestant faction wearing the white hats), let this lowly Franciscan know that the reason Obama fired the Secretary of Defense last winter was because the Secretary had recently dared to force Andrew Marshall from his post at the Pentagon. Thereby we see that "Ambrose" is sufficiently high up in the Pentagon pecking order that when the American Secretary of Defense dares to cross "Ambrose's" best bud in the Pentagon, Andrew Marshall, then it is the American Secretary of Defense who promptly gets the ax a month later. Not "Ambrose"! So when "Ambrose" claims to have friends high up in Washington he is not exaggerating.

And as for the truthfulness of what is being typed here by a foolish Franciscan, what can be said? Who could make this stuff up? Who could come up with "Ambrose" or Father Pfeiffer or Pablo for that matter? Not even Shakespeare could spin such strange fiction. Something this outrageous must be true. And hence the value of poetic imagination in this sometimes incredible world in which we for a short time happen to reside.

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #97 on:** October 19, 2015, 10:02:03 PM »

More tripe from "Ambrose". This reads like Benjamin Fulford trying to be William Faulkner.

You left out the White Dragon Society, reptilian shapeshifters, and Jimmy Hoffa.

PG · « **Reply #98 on:** October 19, 2015, 11:10:41 PM »

Franciscansolitary(aka ambrose moran) has let the cat out of the bag, and it is a sign of his defeat. There is no future for him in tradition.

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #99 on:** October 20, 2015, 05:25:23 AM »

Quote from: + PG +

Franciscansolitary(aka ambrose moran) has let the cat out of the bag, and it is a sign of his defeat. There is no future for him in tradition.

I don't have time now (or the stomach) to go back and listen to the OLMC "sermon" he gave but the same talking points are used. Didn't he say in the "sermon" that he is a Franciscan?

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #100 on:** October 20, 2015, 05:29:02 AM »

Quote from: Franciscan Solitary

And will continue to cohere forever and ever, Worlds Without End.

Very Freemasonic. Not Catholic.

ultrarigorist · « **Reply #101 on:** October 20, 2015, 06:59:42 AM »

Quote from: + PG +

Franciscansolitary(aka ambrose moran) has let the cat out of the bag, and it is a sign of his defeat. There is no future for him in tradition.

No, it can't be him. Bill Moran ("Ambrose") assured us he's not mentally ill.

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #102 on:** October 20, 2015, 09:54:34 AM »

Quote from: Franciscan Solitary

And as for the truthfulness of what is being typed here by a foolish Franciscan, what can be said? Who could make this stuff up? Who could come up with "Ambrose" or Father Pfeiffer or Pablo for that matter? Not even Shakespeare could spin such strange fiction. Something this outrageous must be true. And hence the value of poetic imagination in this sometimes incredible world in which we for a short time happen to reside.

"Up the dosage", that's what.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #103 on:** October 20, 2015, 10:57:53 AM »

FS:

Quote

"Ambrose" did not go to Boston to be with Pablo. "Ambrose" can pick a winner and he knows clear as day that Fr. Pfeiffer has the potential to set the South on fire -- with a little help from his "new friends". A Southern Neo-Reformation would be the perfect backdrop to the Ukrainian War that could hurl the Ukrainians all the way to the Kremlin and the Pacific Ocean.

Now folks, be kind to Franciscan S. He does set up the possibility of a neo-Reformation in the South, ignited by the fiery preaching of Fr. P, somehow, someway, resulting in Ukrainians being hurled "all the way to the Kremlin." That's powerful stuff. Oh yes! He doesn't stop there-- No, no, this "Southern Neo-Reformation" will help to accomplish much more than that. It will see Ukrainians driven over a huge land masses, all the way to the Pacific Ocean itself.
You might wonder what all this has to do with us, or more particularly, with Fr. P and Boston, KY. But don't. Just accept FS's prophetical words, and deal with them. :scratchchin:

MaterDominici · « **Reply #104 on:** October 20, 2015, 03:57:18 PM »

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant

Quote from: Franciscan Solitary

And as for the truthfulness of what is being typed here by a foolish Franciscan, what can be said? Who could make this stuff up? Who could come up with "Ambrose" or Father Pfeiffer or Pablo for that matter? Not even Shakespeare could spin such strange fiction. Something this outrageous must be true. And hence the value of poetic imagination in this sometimes incredible world in which we for a short time happen to reside.

"Up the dosage", that's what.