Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer  (Read 6344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15060
  • Reputation: +10006/-3162
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
« Reply #45 on: July 13, 2021, 02:09:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!3
    • Quote from: Quo vadis Domine on July 13, 2021, 02:01:05 PM
    I really feel very sorry for you Sean. I never gave you a single downvote, but you just admitted that you just gave me a bunch. I forgive you and I will pray for you.

    You do that.

    God is very interested in whether and how you get thumbs-up or down on Cathinfo.

    Do you think I should go to confession?   :facepalm: :jester: :laugh2: :laugh1:

    Let me know if you receive any allocutions in response to those prayers.

    :popcorn:
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2896/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #46 on: July 13, 2021, 02:14:30 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: SeanJohnson on July 13, 2021, 02:06:47 PM
    Sorry, but YOU (not the rest of the world) will never have a true pope, because you believe you carry within yourself the only power to affirm or deny his legitimacy.

    Therefore, you are really just a protestant masquerading as a faithful Catholic.

    :facepalm: :facepalm:

    I just pray you aren’t like this in real life: Vindictive, mean spirited, and proud. You just claimed that I’m not a Catholic while I’m bending over backwards to give you the benefit of the doubt.  :facepalm: :'(
    Logged
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3162
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #47 on: July 13, 2021, 02:15:43 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!4
    • Quote from: Quo vadis Domine on July 13, 2021, 02:14:30 PM
    I just pray you aren’t like this in real life: Vindictive, mean spirited, and proud. You just claimed that I’m not a Catholic while I’m bending over backwards to give you the benefit of the doubt.  :facepalm: :'(

    "The sedevacantist cries in pain as he strikes you!"

    :facepalm: :facepalm: :jester:
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2896/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #48 on: July 13, 2021, 02:21:47 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: SeanJohnson on July 13, 2021, 02:09:24 PM
    You do that.

    God is very interested in whether and how you get thumbs-up or down on Cathinfo.

    Do you think I should go to confession?   :facepalm: :jester: :laugh2: :laugh1:

    Let me know if you receive any allocutions in response to those prayers.

    :popcorn:

    Yep, I will. Thanks for the opportunity! 🙂
    Logged
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3162
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #49 on: July 13, 2021, 02:23:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!3
    • Quote from: Quo vadis Domine on July 13, 2021, 02:21:47 PM
    Yep, I will. Thanks for the opportunity! 🙂
    You're welcome.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46717
    • Reputation: +27597/-5125
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #50 on: July 13, 2021, 04:22:30 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: SeanJohnson on July 13, 2021, 02:01:56 PM
    I know you don't care about this Lad, but for those that do: https://benedictinos.blog/2020/10/15/the-ministry-and-validity-of-mons-thuc/

    5. SOUNDNESS OF MIND?

    Great, Sean; he was timid and easily influenced.  I know people like that.  This has nothing whatsoever to do with whether he was capable of confecting the Sacraments.
    Logged

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3162
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #51 on: July 13, 2021, 04:44:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on July 13, 2021, 04:22:30 PM
    Great, Sean; he was timid and easily influenced.  I know people like that.  This has nothing whatsoever to do with whether he was capable of confecting the Sacraments.
    Do you know many like that who consecrate leaders of Satanic sects?  Or who believe the Virgin Mary sent a driver to pick them up to embark upon a special mission from heaven?  Or who, despite holding triple doctorates, believe that if they consecrate bishops for the Old Catholic schismatics, it makes them Catholic again?  
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3162
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #52 on: July 13, 2021, 05:10:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • According to this thread, Thuc conditionally consecrated some guy who doubted the validity of the bishop who originally consecrated him.  That Bishop was Archbishop Thuc!

    Yes, apparently Thuc doubted the validity of his first consecration.

    The theory is that after Thuc’s brother was αssαssιnαtҽd, it hurt his sanity.

    It also mentions that Lefebvre conditionally confirmed all those who had been confirmed by Thuc bishops, because he considered them doubtfully consecrated.

    https://www.fisheaters.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=80825
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46717
    • Reputation: +27597/-5125
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #53 on: July 13, 2021, 05:16:04 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
    • Sean, the more you post, the more you embarrass yourself.  You come across like an immature baby.
    Logged

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3162
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #54 on: July 13, 2021, 05:26:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on July 13, 2021, 05:16:04 PM
    Sean, the more you post, the more you embarrass yourself.  You come across like an immature baby.

    Judging by your emotional outbursts, I’m more inclined to believe the truth of the matter is, the more I post, the more I embarrass you.

    I do understand that my posts make it harder to whitewash Thuc, and that exposing your nonsense about Kelly being the only one doubting the validity of Thuc consecrations is probably frustrating for you.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2896/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #55 on: July 13, 2021, 05:26:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Word has it Thuc was found hiding in a Dallas book depository on November 22, 1963.

    Also, now this is just alleged, but he was the mastermind behind both the Brinks heists of 1950 AND 1981!  :facepalm:
    Logged
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46717
    • Reputation: +27597/-5125
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #56 on: July 13, 2021, 05:34:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: SeanJohnson on July 13, 2021, 05:26:03 PM
    Judging by your emotional outbursts, I’m more inclined to believe the truth of the matter is, the more I post, the more I embarrass you.

    I do understand that my posts make it harder to whitewash Thuc, and that exposing your nonsense about Kelly being the only one doubting the validity of Thuc consecrations is probably frustrating for you.


    Logged

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3162
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #57 on: July 13, 2021, 05:41:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on July 13, 2021, 05:34:38 PM

    I understand your pain, and appreciate you sending me your pic.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3162
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #58 on: July 13, 2021, 05:42:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Quo vadis Domine on July 13, 2021, 05:26:41 PM
    Word has it Thuc was found hiding in a Dallas book depository on November 22, 1963.

     :facepalm:
    False:
    He was hiding in a basement in Palmar de Troya.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Artist

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 2
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Burfit (SSPX) Condemns Bishop (?) Pfeiffer
    « Reply #59 on: July 15, 2021, 09:56:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • .... while Fr. Perez, CA, allows a questionable "cleric" to distribute Holy Communion:



    Daniel Croisette, one of Pfeiffer's "deacons" (at the time) is introduced at minute 17:38, and distributes at minute 55.

    Fr. Perez said, "I don't know," when queried "Do you believe the consecretion of Fr. Pfeiffer to be legitimate?"

    Wonder when/if we will see Fr. Perez allow "Fr." Croisette or "Fr" Noah Cooke (both "ordained" by  Pfeiffer in June 2021) to say mass at his chapels.
    Logged
    Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
    « previous next »