Author Topic: Fr. Bouchart interview about The event in The Cathedral in Buenos Aires (Read 6497 times)

Centroamerica · « **on:** December 04, 2013, 07:00:32 AM »

I am beginning to feel that the English speaking part of the resistance and the Spanish are isolated from each other to some degree because of language. It would do more people good to learn Spanish.

Fr. Bouchart the superior of the SSPX in South America gave an interview on the demonstration in the cathedral in Buenos Aires concerning the B'nai B'rith gathering and the false ecuмenism. For those not aware of the events here's what the SSPX English report says http://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/buenos-aires-rosary-protest-facts-2799

You can also find enough videos on YouTube. It was aimed at Pope Francis since he created the event when he was archbishop.

At first it appeared that the district superior was supporting the event. Then he gave an interview in Spanish here: http://statveritasblog.blogspot.com.br/2013/12/entrevista-al-superior-del-distrito-de.html?m=1

To highlight the parts of the interview Fr. Bouchart claims that what they (the faithful praying Rosaries in the cathedral for reparation for false ecuмenism) did was STUPID and he does not support it. He doesn't stop there. He goes on to say that the Jєωs were not guilty of deicide!!! Then at the end of the interview he is asked if he apologized and he replies that he sent a letter to the archbishop inviting him to dialogue.

He wouldn't have made those comments regarding the occupation of Saint Nicolas du Chardonette in France, at least not survived let alone remain a priest of the SSPX. This is our superior here in South America. Another source quoted a liberal Paul VI as condemning the words of Fr. Bouchart making the assumption that his ideas are more liberal than Paul VI regarding the Jєωs. How does a story like this go completely unnoticed in the English speaking world?

John Grace · « **Reply #1 on:** December 04, 2013, 07:09:06 AM »

Another thread on Cath Info has reported on the latest antics of the kosher SSPX.

Quote

This is our superior here in South America.

Unless you a priest, a religious or third order, he is not your superior.

John Grace · « **Reply #2 on:** December 04, 2013, 07:10:34 AM »

Quote

How does a story like this go completely unnoticed in the English speaking world?

The bulk of SSPX laity ignored Zionism/Jєωry at heart of the SSPX. They didn't care.

Those who regard themselves as Christian Democrat would agree with Krah. Few in the SSPX are solid on Yids.

The Irish SSPX District publicly bent down to International Jєωry and many SSPX laity supported a man, who aligned himself with the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

Many SSPX laity in Ireland have also been Christian Solidarity party candidates. A ʝʊdɛօ-christian party.

Few are solid on Yids.

John Grace · « **Reply #3 on:** December 04, 2013, 07:16:58 AM »

The earlier thread. Wessex makes a good summary and analysis of SSPX laity.They were like sheep penned in.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/The-Jєωιѕн-people-did-not-commit-the-deicide

Centroamerica · « **Reply #4 on:** December 04, 2013, 07:42:38 AM »

Quote from: John Grace

Another thread on Cath Info has reported on the latest antics of the kosher SSPX.

Yes I just saw that now. I guess I was wrong about the insufficient relay of information. Nevertheless, an English search on the web browser for the topic results in nothing.

John Grace · « **Reply #5 on:** December 04, 2013, 08:11:19 AM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

Quote from: John Grace
Another thread on Cath Info has reported on the latest antics of the kosher SSPX.

Yes I just saw that now. I guess I was wrong about the insufficient relay of information. Nevertheless, an English search on the web browser for the topic results in nothing.

Language has no bearing on these matters. The information is there in many languages. Previously a pro-SSPX forum removed factual material. Material in various languages.

John Grace · « **Reply #6 on:** December 04, 2013, 08:13:10 AM »

Quote

He goes on to say that the Jєωs were not guilty of deicide!!!

The SSPX are pro-Jєωιѕн and pro-Zionist so why the surprise with this.

Zzz · « **Reply #7 on:** December 04, 2013, 08:13:28 AM »

I guess it's okay to boot the Buddhists in Grand Rapids, but not the Jєωs in B.A.

John Grace · « **Reply #8 on:** December 04, 2013, 08:17:18 AM »

Quote

I am beginning to feel that the English speaking part of the resistance and the Spanish are isolated from each other to some degree because of language. It would do more people good to learn Spanish.

The pro-SSPX Ignis Ardens forum famously removed material and docuмents in various languages. Factual material. Cath Info never removed the material.

John Grace · « **Reply #9 on:** December 04, 2013, 08:19:24 AM »

Quote from: Zzz

I guess it's okay to boot the Buddhists in Grand Rapids, but not the Jєωs in B.A.

The SSPX is controlled by Jєωs.

The Rothschild-Gutmann Money Behind the SSPX Kosher Imperative
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.ie/2012/11/the-rothschild-gutmann-money-behind.html

John Grace · « **Reply #10 on:** December 04, 2013, 08:21:24 AM »

The business partner of the liberal Bishop Fellay.

John Grace · « **Reply #11 on:** December 04, 2013, 08:47:40 AM »

Many priests and laity support the resistance. Those who remain with the new SSPX have many questions to answer. One is why they still finance the kosher outfit.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #12 on:** December 04, 2013, 08:52:44 AM »

I actually agree that the METHOD of the protest was very imprudent (aka "stupid"); it just makes Traditional Catholics look bad and probably wins more points for Francis than for Traditional Catholics. You migth say, who cares? Well, the point of a protest is to make a public point, to sway people towards the truth. To that end, it was counterproductive. They would have been better served by quietly and prayerfully holding signs outside the church building. They made themselves look like an angry and unruly mob filled with bitter zeal.

On the other hand, this priest's pandering to Jєωs was also unacceptable on the other side.

John Grace · « **Reply #13 on:** December 04, 2013, 08:56:55 AM »

Quote

I actually agree that the METHOD of the protest was very imprudent (aka "stupid"); it just makes Traditional Catholics look bad and probably wins more points for Francis than for Traditional Catholics. You migth say, who cares? Well, the point of a protest is to make a public point, to sway people towards the truth. To that end, it was counterproductive. They would have been better served by quietly and prayerfully holding signs outside the church building. They made themselves look like an angry and unruly mob filled with bitter zeal.

Pray and be good? On the point of "imprudent" 'New Templar' in Ireland was using this term in relation to His Lordship Bishop Williamson. He thought it bad he told the truth about the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst'.

Angelism and Quietism like blind obedience has also destroyed the SSPX.

bowler · « **Reply #14 on:** December 04, 2013, 09:23:01 AM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

To highlight the parts of the interview Fr. Bouchart claims that what they ... did was STUPID and he does not support it. ...that the Jєωs were not guilty of deicide!!! Then at the end of the interview he is asked if he apologized and he replies that he sent a letter to the archbishop inviting him to dialogue

He says it was stupid, but he was there with them. A good question to ask is why is it stupid?

Also, what does he mean by the Jєωs were not guilty of deicide, killing God?

Why was Jesus Christ crucified? Because He was condemned to death by the Sanhedrin, and the supreme Rabbi the High Priest Caiaphas. Were they not Jєωs?

Isn't Jesus Christ God?

This Bouchart missed an opportunity to teach truth. He is a coward.

When Mel Gibson was asked the same question, I think he answered that "it wasn't the Swedes that did it". A good response, to show what a joke the question is.