Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Arnaud: An injustice to accuse the Society of betraying +ABL.  (Read 3609 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Fr. Arnaud: An injustice to accuse the Society of betraying +ABL.
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2019, 06:01:31 PM »
So let's discuss some of the Resistance's allegations about the supposed unfaithfulness of the SSPX to +ABL, despite the fact that Archbishop Lefebvre very often negotiated with Rome for decades, in just the same way as his Society has (rightly) continued to do under +Fellay and +Pagliarani. Some years ago, Fr. Arnaud wrote in a letter to Society Faithful,

"Where do we stand in the midst of such important happenings? We stand and remain in the same place as yesterday. The circuмstances around us may change; our adhesion to the Catholic Faith remains total and unmitigated in our dedication to battle faithfully for a full restoration of Tradition within the Catholic Church. As a matter of fact, we have not created the circuмstances around us—they exist by Divine Providence. We just have to accept reality and act accordingly. As always, the Society is committed to the defense of the Catholic Faith in its entirety, without any compromise with “the neo-Modernist and neo-Protestant tendencies clearly evident in the Second Vatican Council and, after the Council, in all the reforms which issued from it.” As Bishop Fellay repeated in his recent letter to benefactors, we adhere with our whole heart to the words of our founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, in the declaration of November 21, 1974: “This reformation, born of liberalism and modernism, is poisoned through and through; it derives from heresy and ends in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is therefore impossible for any conscientious and faithful Catholic to espouse this reformation or to submit to it in any way whatsoever.” On the other hand, we hold fast to the Roman Catholic Church, to Eternal Rome, recognizing in the Holy Father, Pope Francis, the Bishop of Rome, the successor of Saint Peter and Vicar of Our Lord Jesus Christ on earth. We recognize that he is the one who possesses the keys of Heaven, full jurisdiction over the Church. Given that the crisis came from the collapse of Church authority, it is clear that only the Pope has in his hands the means to end the crisis of the Church.

Since the seventies many do not understand how we can hold fast to this twofold principle, which seems so contradictory. How many have deviated, even in very recent history, from this double-sided position. Some have strayed into a blind submission to the Roman authorities despite the evidence of the crisis within the Church, while others reject, at least in practice if not in principle, the reality of these authorities and therefore a prudent submission whenever possible. I would like therefore to take this opportunity to warn you against grave errors and injustice committed against the Society and its superiors in the past few months. We have waited patiently in hope that some of the confused priests or faithful would see by themselves the lack of foundation of their criticisms, infested with a revolutionary spirit, definitely a temptation under the appearance of good, nevertheless a diabolical trap, based on emotion, fear and resentment, under the appearance of a defense of the Faith, which has led to harder and harder positions against the Society of Saint Pius X, including its founder. It is very understandable that with this confusion some of you may have been misled. Please, let me remind you here the rules of Saint Ignatius that one should apply in these circuмstances. When a situation or a thought brings “disquiet or disturbs the soul, taking away its peace, tranquility and quiet, which it had before, it is a clear sign that it proceeds from the evil spirit, enemy of our profit and eternal salvation.” In such a situation Saint Ignatius adds also not to make any decision, any change, and wait for a more peaceful time ...

It is indeed an injustice to accuse the Society of betraying the legacy of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, with false accusations, rash judgments and extrapolations. The fact of repeating them over and over does not make them any less false. It is an injustice to allege that the authorities of the Society have betrayed the Faith by proposing a “doctrinal declaration,” as if Archbishop Lefebvre had betrayed the Faith by signing the protocol of May 1988. He himself explained to the seminarians at Ecône that the protocol was not bad in itself, and no one had ever accused the Archbishop of betrayal for signing it. It is a grave injustice to the members as well as to the faithful of the Society to call for the dismissal or resignation of the Society’s Superior General. It is immoral to use unjust means in order to attain one’s goal. The revelation of private docuмents is a perfect example of injustice. It is an injustice to call for disobedience and rebellion without facts or undeniable proofs, using fear and prediction of a contingent future. It is an injustice to lead the faithful to distrust their pastors because they do not rebel against their superiors ...

These attacks against our Society, this little fortress of Catholic life and Tradition, are fomented clearly by the father of all lies, the devil. That is why we must answer these attacks with supernatural means, by a life of prayer, by accepting our daily crosses and especially those of our duty of state, offering them to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Without bitterness but with great charity, let us also pray for those who are misguided or misguiding. I am confident that once the storm is over, by the grace of God, the Society, with its members and its faithful, will find itself strengthened in the Faith, as well as in Hope and Charity. I would like to finish by heartily thanking the many of you who have been faithful and confident in God’s Providence during this turmoil, manifesting trust in and support of your pastors. Recommending this letter to the protection of Our Mother and of Saint Joseph, I assure you of my prayers and give you my priestly blessing. Father Arnaud Rostand

I should have made Fr. Rostand's letter an Afterword to my book (i.e., to highlight how ridiculous it is).

Re: Fr. Arnaud: An injustice to accuse the Society of betraying +ABL.
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2019, 06:20:51 PM »
Quote from: Ekim
Anyone who has been around for the past 15-20 years knows the SSPX has TOTALLY changed.
That is anecdotal and subjective. There have been Priests likes Fr. Schmidberger who've been with the Society for 47 years, knew the Archbishop well, and still are. There are other very strongly Traditional Priests like Fr. Peter Scott etc who still disagree with the Resistance.

+ABL was also accused of changing: "they always had the same Mass there - the one we say today. So, we have not changed a thing. How can they now say, "The Archbishop is changing"? What? What am I changing? They know perfectly well - they spent years at Econe - that they had there the liturgy which we now have, that we have not changed one iota, not one thing ... So it is very sad to think that these priests who were ordained by myself and who, after all is said and done, receiving everything from Econe and the Society, should now be turning against the Society. Why? They say we are making compromises, they say we are going to accept the New Mass, they say things of this kind, which are absolutely false. You can see that for yourselves ... I trust you will remain faithful and that we will be able to continue working together for the greater good of the Church, because there is nothing more disastrous, even in the face of Rome, than these divisions, because these divisions weaken us and weaken our fight for Tradition. So, let us pray that everything will be sorted out." http://archives.sspx.org/archbishop_lefebvre/long_island_conference_1983.htm

So, firstly, there is and has been no substantial change in the Society, and the SSPX is not going to start offering the New Mass, no matter what its detractors say, just as they said it of +ABL. Secondly, there are accidental changes which do happen from time to time as a result of further study - before 2007, there was not absolute unanimity among SSPX Priests (at least negative doubts were entertained by some, since a study such as the one +ABL asked to be done had not been completed) about the new rite of consecration.

But after that time, thanks to no less than a Dominican Father, Fr. Pierre Marie of the Avrille Dominicans, that doubt was cleared. You can call that a "change" if you want to, but it's actually more of clarity on a disputed matter emerging as a result of prayerful study.

Quote from: SeanJohnson
I should have made Fr. Rostand's letter an Afterword to my book (i.e., to highlight how ridiculous it is)
Maybe you should have highlighted some of Archbishop Lefebvre's warnings about the Nine, too, in your book, Sean. Some of you resistance folk would certainly have "resisted him to his face" just as you are currently in rebellion against your legitimate superiors in the SSPX.

+ABL on the Nine in 1983, from the link above: "Personally, I am not seeking to harm these priests - may God be their judge! And I ask you not to get into polemics, but simply to follow us. You now have here a magnificent chapel. Come and attend Mass in this chapel with the priests of the Society, and, in the various centers, bring about a regrouping of the faithful staying with the Society, so that they keep their bond with Rome and with the Church. It is very important that there should always be the bond with Rome if we wish to remain Catholic; even if we do not agree with everything being done in Rome, I think the bond is absolutely indispensable.

That is what I wished to say to you."


Re: Fr. Arnaud: An injustice to accuse the Society of betraying +ABL.
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2019, 07:55:24 PM »
 :facepalm:


Re: Fr. Arnaud: An injustice to accuse the Society of betraying +ABL.
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2019, 09:57:27 PM »
The lady doth protest too much, methinks

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. Arnaud: An injustice to accuse the Society of betraying +ABL.
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2019, 10:09:38 PM »
That is anecdotal and subjective. …

Yeah, 101 "subjective anecdotes":