Mithrandylan,
I might be "slightly biased" in favor of Bishop Williamson, but you are not exactly an imperfect third party observer, as you pretend to be. Hey, at least SOMEONE is honest.
As as matter of fact, in about a dozen places in your post you betray your STRONG FEELINGS and OPINIONS about Bishop Williamson, Bishop Morello, and the matter in question. You are several times more biased than me, only in the opposite direction.
1. You are a sedevacantist. And your speech throughout your post gives away your STRONG opinions in the matter. You aren't just impartially relating facts, in love with the truth, or any of that. You're working for your team, PERIOD. And that team is Team Sedevacantism.
2. You frequent/visit various forums including those dedicated to Fr. Pfeiffer/Sedevacantism/hatred of Bishop Williamson.
3. Related to #2, you got your "report" from one of those fora. You weren't a witness to anything you allege, and you weren't even CLOSE TO THE EVENTS as in "I knew someone who was involved." You are a young man who was probably riding a tricycle (or maybe you already mastered the "big boy" two-wheel bicycle) when Uruttigoity and the "Society of St. John" was working their drama at the SSPX seminary in the late 1990's.
4. You are inclined to trust your sedevacantist bishop(s)/priest(s), while I'm inclined to trust Bishop Williamson, Bishop Faure, Bishop Thomas Aquinas, and the priests with them, on this issue.
5. The crisis in the SSPX is basically a "reset switch" for a large part of the true fight for Tradition. Tradition has, almost overnight, become much much smaller.
6. It's a fact that there is a WAR going on right now in Tradition, in particular on the burning wreck of a ship that used to be the SSPX. The Sedevacantists want to make sure they have a stronger hand this "go round" in the world of Tradition. Also, you have rogue priests (like Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer) who doesn't scruple to slander those who refuse to work under him -- including Bishop Williamson. Fr. Pfeiffer in particular has widespread propaganda to this end.
7. Therefore I have made it a matter of policy to not allow Fr. Pfeiffer's propaganda (or that of the sedevacantists, who I disagree with) on my forum.
8. Last but not least, don't kid yourself that you posted an impartial report. The report in question basically demonizes Bp. Williamson while canonizing Bp. Morello. That is why I call it propaganda. It skews things in one direction -- the direction of the agenda of the one who wrote it. You're obviously ok with that agenda, but I'm not.