Matthew raises some good points here, and his description of said priest is substantially accurate, and I would agree with him.
But said priest's indiscretions as well as his zeal are, and have been focused on and mostly limited to the SSPX universe. They are relevant in that context, but not universally applicable to the whole Church.
If Bishop Fellay had not been Krahmerized and gone off the reservation, said priest would still be happily plowing the Asian fields as an onboard member of the SSPX. The Society would have kept on functioning as before, serving as a gatekeeper, in a sustained holding action for the foreseeable future, as it had for decades.
Placed within this context, this resistance so called exists mainly within that universe, and the SSPX and its spinoff, the resistance are engaged in what is a local conflagration. They are battling each other and not the revolutionary rulers of the greater Church.
Said priest, and priests, had a great opportunity to create a true counter revolutionary movement and move into the greater crisis and leave local concerns for the concerns of the whole Church. They were not interested, as it seems that they believe that fighting changes in the SSPX is the same as fighting the greater revolution of the Church. It is not
The SSPX is a victim of apostate Rome, this priest and his resistance are victims of the SSPX......and the monster remains unscathed.