You are correct that Archbishop Lefebvre was not a Sedevacantist.  But would he be an Interregnumist if he were alive today?  Hmm.

There's been a lot of speculation about what +ABL would be if he were alive today. Who wants to focus on what he actually was? Hardly anyone.

Archbishop Lefebvre needs to be "updated" to fit the new sedevacantist narrative, and this forum facilitates that. And of course, there are many varieties of sedevacantism. Take your pick.

The Archbishop did not obsess on the Pope, like so many here do. He had better things to do. 

See you think that Archbishop Lefebvre needs to be "updated" in order to reconcile him with rejecting Jorge Bergoglio as pope if he were alive today.  Wrong.  Archbishop Lefebvre clearly understood that it depended upon the evidence (indicia of heresy).  The Archbishop did not hold to some universal principle that one can never judge a putative pope as not being pope until a future pope makes the judgment.

No, it's not me who thinks that +ABL needs to be updated. It's all you various flavors of sedevacantism who think that. 

No, it's not me who thinks that +ABL needs to be updated. It's all you various flavors of sedevacantism who think that.

Read again what I wrote.  You missed it.

I understood what you wrote. Go ahead and update +ABL according to your own opinions. You are hardly the only one to do so. Eventually, most trads will forget about +ABL, and the good example he provided.

What makes you think that Archbishop Lefebvre would accept Jorge Bergoglio as pope if he were alive today?

Don't forget -- it's a pretty hefty interregnum. The Church has never seen one even a fraction as long as the time elapsed from the death of Pius XII to today.

I use the term "Interregnumist" for one who holds that the last true pope was Benedict XVI.

2 Thessalonians Chapter 2

1 And we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of our gathering together unto him:  2 That you be not easily moved from your sense, nor be terrified, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by epistle, as sent from us, as if the day of the Lord were at hand.  3 Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition,  4 Who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God.  5 Remember you not, that when I was yet with you, I told you these things?

6- And now you know what withholdeth, that he may be revealed in his time  7 For the mystery of iniquity already worketh; only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way.  8 And then that wicked one shall be revealed whom the Lord Jesus shall kill with the spirit of his mouth; and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming, him,  9 Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders,  10 And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying:

11 That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity.  12 But we ought to give thanks to God always for you, brethren, beloved of God, for that God hath chosen you firstfruits unto salvation, in sanctification of the spirit, and faith of the truth:  13 Whereunto also he hath called you by our gospel, unto the purchasing of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.  14 Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.  15 Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God and our Father, who hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation, and good hope in grace,

16 Exhort your hearts, and confirm you in every good work and word.

This chapter has always held me in a special awe because it provides me with the framework necessary to respond in a Catholic way to world events. I have to live in this world (for a time), so I need the compass of Truth.

So:

• near The End
• there will be a revolt
• "he who now holdeth" (a true Pope) shall be "taken out of the way"
• unleashing the Anti-Christ

and

• those who do not love the Truth
• will be sent the "operation of error to believe lies"
• and will be damned for their failure to love the Truth.

and

• for our Salvation we must adhere to the perennial and unchangeable Truth

Opinion: Meg rages and obsesses (ineffectually!) because she refuses to see that the one who "holdeth" has been "taken out of the way." The V2 and post-V2 papal pretenders have not "held" against the Anti-Christ. Instead they have facilitated the Anti-Christ.

You all can believe whatever the Hell [literally] you want to believe. I believe that anyone who believes that Jorge "holds [against the Anti-Christ]" and is a true Pope does not love the Truth, so God has sent you the "operation of error to believe lies."

Obsess and rage on as you will.

So....being in the midst of the crisis that God has permitted isn't to your liking? Join the club, my friend, join the club.
My advice is to get some rest, then take up your cross again; it ain't gonna move itself.

6 For wrath is in his indignation; and life in his good will. In the evening weeping shall have place, and in the morning gladness.

Our Lord wept at times, I see division over this, sorrow is a natural response.

I never put my trust in Vigano, I was always weary of him, problem was the praise the resistance (the ABL resistance) was giving him. I was getting more suspicious when he used Jorge or Bergoglio instead of Pope Francis. I couldn't even finish any of his discourses, too long and I'm not that smart with the language he uses. ABL is more clear. 

Sure you did.  He's been using "Jorge" or "Bergoglio" for a long time now.  If he hadn't gone "sede!" (according to you), you wouldn't be here whining (and weeping) about him.