This was posted just yesterday on the french resistance forum.

Here is a google translation. And the link. Hopefully it will wake up some among us who still insist on going to the SSPX. (Including Sean Johnson)

----------------

On the occasion of a marriage celebrated in Nantes in a chapel of the SSPX (Chapel of Placelière), the Abbé Lajoinie received the consents of two faithful of the said chapel. Shortly before the signing of the registers, Father Lajoinie announced with a triumphant air that the consents had been received within the framework of the diocesan jurisdiction and that the bishop had given his consent. The priest finished this announcement, as stupefying as it was horrifying, by a masterful deo gratias.

Most of the faithful were rather surprised by this announcement but nevertheless received Communion at this Mass.

Fr. France (the SSPX priest- real name), prior of Nantes, will bear responsibility for this action if he does not react to this scandal. Let us pray for him.

It is left now to serious faithful who do not want this conciliar jurisdiction to have recourse to priests who do not belong to the current structure of the SSPX


-------
http://resistance.vraiforum.com/t373-Premiers-mariages-sous-le-signe-de-la-juridiction-diocesaine.htm

Responsible for what exactly? Acting like one he presumably "recognizes" as a diocesan bishop, actually has jurisdiction i.e. acting coherently and consistently?

Seriously, please break out the finger-paints. Spell it out if you would.

Are you joking? Are you really that slow of mind?
Traditional Catholics act under extraordinary jurisdiction, not ordinary. It is positively sinful to put ourselves under a heretical modernist structure in any way. The SSPX cannot any longer call itself traditional.

Are you joking? Are you really that slow of mind?
Traditional Catholics act under extraordinary jurisdiction, not ordinary. It is positively sinful to put ourselves under a heretical modernist structure in any way. The SSPX cannot any longer call itself traditional.

No, I'm not joking.

If I really am "... that slow of mind...", then I'd hardly be in a position to perform an accurate self-assessment to make said determination now would I?


Perhaps I wasn't clear enough either. I'll rephrase.

Who, besides for example some dude named "moosy" on an internet forum, Traditionally, authoritatively teaches what "moosy" says? On what principle/s?

Are you joking? Are you really that slow of mind?
Traditional Catholics act under extraordinary jurisdiction, not ordinary. It is positively sinful to put ourselves under a heretical modernist structure in any way. The SSPX cannot any longer call itself traditional.

It means that if all the parties do what tehy are supposed to do (that includes both the SSPX priest and the diocesan bishop) then the marriages that are officiated by the SSPX priest will be recognized as valid by the rest of the Catholic Church.    

In this case the SSPX matters, however it will be at another stage of its existence.  

Okay?

A lot of priests in the resistance actually. But the faithful are not listening. Many prefer to think that they can go on attending sspx Masses indefinitely, or when a "deal is signed". Which will never happen in that way of course. As if it is not enough that 3 sacraments are approved.

The problem is that our bishops are not saying anything. Bishop Faure came out on the subject in august of last year, but a few months later totally backtracked on it in France, when he was put under pressure from some liberal faithful there (which describes most of the resistance faithful in France).

Bishop Faure is afraid of Bishop Williamson, and we don't need to go into detail on the latter's view of Mass attendance. So it is up the the faithful like us to take a stand with the support of many priests in the resistance, until our bishops find the courage.

Let's not forget the influence of the Dominicans of Avrille of course, who despite the warnings of other priests in France, refuse to condemn attendance at SSPX Masses. They are afraid of losing their influence (a false fear of course). Bishop Faure also looks to them and is dependent on them for his seminary. It's a vicious circle.

None of this bodes well for the future of the resistance, which is the future of the Church. The Bride of Christ. It is not because we think ourselves so great, but because like children look to parents, so too do other Catholics look to us for example, even when they hate what we say.

There will be chastisements for this laziness. Be assured, the Good Lord is just.

Bishop Faure is afraid of Bp. Williamson? That doesn't seem likely. What's there to be afraid of? 

Why would you want the Dominicans of Avrille to condemn attendance at SSPX chapels? There aren't enough Resistance chapels to attend. Home-alone isn't a good option for many. 

You believe that there will be chastisements because the leadership in the Resistance isn't listening to some of the faithful such as yourself? 

Not afraid in general, but afraid to contradict on this point and to act differently.

I am a nobody; I am not expecting anyone to listen to me. But in all countries except for France most of the resistance faithful no longer attend SSPX Masses. The communiqué of the USML back last august said this was the right thing to do, because it is practically the same thing as the indulters.

The (old)SSPX made very clear its position of attending these Masses. During the Arian heresy, one of the saints ( I think St. Hermingild or something like that) refused to take communion of from the hands of a perfectly validly consecrated bishop. The law of the Church says we should not accept the sacraments from the schismatics, even though they are validly consecrated.

The Church is in a very grave crises of a doctrinal nature. It is eclipsed by heresy. We cannot have anything to do that and must react like valiant soldiers to it.

I appreciate your explanation. I don't really know much about the situation in France, but are you quite sure that everywhere else in the world, other than France, the Resistance faithful no longer attend SSPX Masses? Where do they attend, then? 

I'm not sure what the USML is. Are they affiliated with the four Resistance bishops?

I understand what you are saying about the SSPX Masses being the same as the Indulterers, but I have to disagree. I stopped attending an FSSP Mass several months ago, and am now attending the local SSPX chapel again. There's a huge difference between the two. I'm so glad I stopped attending the FSSP parish. There are liberal tendencies in the FSSP, of course.

When I joined the Rosary confraternity of the Dominicans of Avrille last year, I was advised by them that it is not a good idea to attend the FSSP parish, and they were right. They didn't say anything about the SSPX, however, since the subject didn't come up.

The Dominicans of Avrille are prudent. They always have been - as far as I can tell. They say on their website that they do not define themselves by what they are against, but rather by what they are for  - which is truth. 

I don't see that the four Resistance bishops, or the Dominicans of Avrille, believe that the SSPX is schismatic. Though the situation with the SSPX is very serious of course, especially regarding the marriage situation. 

But  they are all under the Pope, which is the problem. ( Under him in a practical way.)

Being subject to a pope is a problem...
:heretic: