Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fellays doctrinal declaration leaked docuмent for the sellout  (Read 11118 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fellays doctrinal declaration leaked docuмent for the sellout
« Reply #20 on: March 09, 2013, 04:09:59 PM »
This preamble seems to be very much along the lines of the protocol of May 5, 1988, with a few additional provisions on the relationship between Tradition and the teaching authority of the Church.


Fellays doctrinal declaration leaked docuмent for the sellout
« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2013, 04:10:04 PM »
I recall the YouTube channel owner 'Oblationem' stating if only we questioned Bishop Fellay more. How many were put under the "holy obedience" like the women on this forum was. She didn't dare question. See where not questioning gets ye.


Fellays doctrinal declaration leaked docuмent for the sellout
« Reply #22 on: March 09, 2013, 04:13:08 PM »
What will +Fellay say about this?

If it is real, why has no deal been done?

I mean, per this docuмent Fellay seems to have done nothing less than completely forsake everything ABL did and stood for, and forsake everything being a traditionalist stands for.

If that's his position, what's taking so long?  Sign the bottom line already.

If that's not his position, why hasn't he done anything to make anyone think otherwise?

A damn mess.

Fellays doctrinal declaration leaked docuмent for the sellout
« Reply #23 on: March 09, 2013, 04:16:18 PM »
They have to wait until there's no risk of a large Exodus of priests and faithful.

Also, it seems likely Bishop Fellay was being asked to make some humiliating public concessions that would have made the "sell" of the deal that much harder to sell.

Fellays doctrinal declaration leaked docuмent for the sellout
« Reply #24 on: March 09, 2013, 04:39:42 PM »
Quote from: Mithrandylan
What will +Fellay say about this?

If it is real, why has no deal been done?

I mean, per this docuмent Fellay seems to have done nothing less than completely forsake everything ABL did and stood for, and forsake everything being a traditionalist stands for.

If that's his position, what's taking so long?


Because Rome did not accept it. Irony of ironies, Rome - apparently in the person of B.XVI himself - replied that the docuмent was too ambiguous, that he needed to make his acceptance of Vatican II clearer and more explicit, and they gave him something to sign which even he couldn't, which didn't even leave him a fig leaf of respectability.