Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Feast of the Assumption Changes  (Read 3269 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15060
  • Reputation: +10006/-3162
  • Gender: Male
Feast of the Assumption Changes
« on: August 15, 2023, 01:30:37 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • In the 1962 Missal today, for the Feast of the Assumption, you heard the Gospel reading taken from Luke 1: 41-50, recounting the Visitation.

    However, in older Missals, this was not the case.

    Formerly, the readings were taken from Luke 10: 38-42, recounting the story of Mary and Martha (with the former taking a contemplative, and the latter an active service of Our Lord, and the Lord saying that Mary had chosen the better part).

    Here's some pics from my 1937 altar Missal:









    Can anyone direct me to a reference/source which explains why this change in Gospel readings was made?
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline magdalena

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2554
    • Reputation: +2037/-42
    • Gender: Female
    But one thing is necessary. Mary hath chosen the best part, which shall not be taken away from her.
    Luke 10:42


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3162
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Feast of the Assumption Changes
    « Reply #2 on: August 15, 2023, 02:07:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks Magdalena!!
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline poenitens

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 254
    • Reputation: +138/-14
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Feast of the Assumption Changes
    « Reply #3 on: December 03, 2023, 06:43:10 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • A commentary by Honorious Augustodunensis in which the writer explains the seemingly odd choice of the Gospel reading for the Feast of the Assumption:

    Quote
    You say you marvel that the Gospel Intravit Jesus and the Canticle should be recited on the Blessed Virgin Mary’s feast, when, as it appears to simple minds, neither speaks of her in the least. First, then, regarding the Gospel know that nothing in the whole course of Scripture can be found more befitting, more apt, more worthy to be read on her hallowed solemnity.

    On the Gospel.
    And so we read: Jesus entered into a certain borough. In a borough there is a high tower with battlements against the enemy, as well as a wall without, which is the protection of the burghers within. This borough was the chapel of the Holy Ghost, to wit the glorious Virgin Mary, Mother of God, who was defended on all sides by a steadfast guard of angels. There is a high tower in her, namely her humility, reaching up to the heights of heaven. Hence it is written : He hath regarded the humility of his handmaid. The external wall, moreover, was her chastity, which supplied an internal fortification for the other virtues. The Lord entered this borough, when he united human nature to himself in the Virgin’s womb.

    And a certain woman named Martha received him into her house. And she had a sister called Mary. Martha represents the active life, and Mary the contemplative life, both of which Mary Ever-Virgin carefully cultivated in Christ.

    She performed all the works of mercy toward him when she served him through the ministries of the active life. When he was exiled from his father’s kingdom for our sake and a stranger in this world, she took him into the inn of her womb, an inn wonderfully adorned with the gemstones of virtue. With her own paps she fed him when he hungered ; over her knees she consoled him when he cried. When he was ill she warmed him with baths; when he was naked she wrapped him with swaddling-clothes. When he wailed she bound him with swaddling-bands; she planted sweet kisses upon him when he laughed. She was exceedingly solicitous in much serving as she fled from the face of Herod into Egypt and then returned. She was much troubled about many things, seeking safety in any place whatever in order to hide him, and a refuge to conceal him. When the sister complained that she was left alone to work, it meant this : Mary—seeing Christ seized by the impious, cruelly dragged away, bound, buffeted, beaten, mocked, condemned with felons, ruthlessly crucified on the gibbet
    of the cross—would have willingly given her life to deliver him, if it were possible. But since she knew that the Godhead inhabited his body,
    in a way she anxiously complained in her soul that it did not come to his aid, but scorned him like a criminal and exposed him to so many evils as if he were so much rubbish.

    The contemplative life.
    Sitting at the Lord’s feet, she thirsted for his words in heart and ear, for she kept these things to ponder through the work of the contemplative life, and ever meditating on spiritual things she yearned for heavenly things. Verily, the Fount of wisdom and knowledge himself made his abode within her, and hence all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge were hidden within her. Now, Martha’s labour having been taken away, she enjoys that life not in sign, but the true Mary is satisfied with the one thing necessary, the joy of eternal sweetness, wherein ever clasped in her Son’s embraces she feasts forever in the sight of his divinity along with the angels. Today she gloriously crossed over into this glory, where her son exalted her as Queen of Heaven over all the orders of angels. Today, that best part that she chose in this life she received double from the Lord’s hand. It shall never be taken away from her; rather when the fullness of joy is granted to the saints, it shall be increased a hundredfold.
    It basically agrees with what Magdalena linked. The full commentary downloaded from the blog Canticuм Salomonis is attached.
    ¡Viva Jesús!

    Please, disregard any opinions and references that I have posted that may seem favorable to any traditionalist group, especially those that pertinaciously deny EENS (CMRI, Sanborn, Dolan and associates, for example).

    Offline poenitens

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 254
    • Reputation: +138/-14
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Feast of the Assumption Changes
    « Reply #4 on: August 15, 2024, 07:29:34 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bump
    ¡Viva Jesús!

    Please, disregard any opinions and references that I have posted that may seem favorable to any traditionalist group, especially those that pertinaciously deny EENS (CMRI, Sanborn, Dolan and associates, for example).


    Offline AMDGJMJ

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3542
    • Reputation: +2147/-81
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Feast of the Assumption Changes
    « Reply #5 on: August 15, 2024, 07:39:07 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bump
    Thanks for bumping.  Good to remember.   :incense:
    "Jesus, Meek and Humble of Heart, make my heart like unto Thine!"

    http://whoshallfindavaliantwoman.blogspot.com/