Author Topic: Father Pfeiffer vs Archbishop Lefebvre (Read 4971 times)

JmJ2cents · « **Reply #5 on:** November 23, 2014, 09:47:27 PM »

You put that so beautifully. The Archbishop just wanted to pass down what was passed down to him. I hate when people call us Levebrist because we are not Levebrist, we are simply Catholic as he was. I wish people would focus on the good that Fr. P does instead of dissecting him to death. He can make mistakes too, he says it all the time himself.

BrJoseph · « **Reply #6 on:** November 24, 2014, 03:21:43 AM »

For what it is worth, the initial posting in this thread is by a new user, it is not by "The Recusant".

Centroamerica · « **Reply #7 on:** November 24, 2014, 03:29:01 AM »

Quote from: BrJoseph

For what it is worth, the initial posting in this thread is by a new user, it is not by "The Recusant".

Good observation.....that seems a bit misleading to say the least, unless of course the user is affiliated with the recusant.

BrJoseph · « **Reply #8 on:** November 24, 2014, 03:33:23 AM »

He is not - I checked.

Recusant Sede · « **Reply #9 on:** November 24, 2014, 05:26:53 AM »

No, I am not affiliated in any way with "The Recusant". I do hold the sedevacantist position, however I don't hold it as dogmatic. I was trying to point out, in the OP, how Father P. is acting like a dogmatic sedeplenist and using Archbishop L. to support his position. Archbishop Lefebvre followed and understood what Saint Robert Bellarmine taught about an heretical pope. I don't care to discuss sedevactism in this thread, I just wanted to expose this blatant fallacy.