Every Sunday after I come back from the empty "Pay, Pray and Obey sermons" so commonly seen in the Neo-SSPX parishes now days, I have to come to these holy priests in these holy sermons to feed my soul with CATHOLIC sermons.

God bless them!

Not sure if this is a different version - but it's the sermon for the same day, by
the same priest, Fr. Girouard, in Vancouver, BC, uploaded by 469fitter on July 4th:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=7CojdlaheDg

As of today it has 139 views. I tried to listen to it 3 weeks ago and then it had less
than 100 views. As I recall, I had a hard time getting through his French accent.
But now, replaying it in segments several times, I am able to recognize the key
words that I had missed previously because he accents the wrong syllable from
what I would expect.

For words like:
tra-DI-tion he says TRA-di-tion;
con-CIL-iar-ists, he says CON-cili-AR-ists;
MO-dernism he says mo-DERN-ism;
a-GREE-ment he says AG-ree-ment
sub-MIT-ting he says SUB-mit-ting
LI-ber-al-ism he says li-ber-AL-ism
con-sci-EN-tious he says con-SCI-en-tious
sub-MIT he says SUB-mit
COM-fort he says com-FORT
COUN-cil he says coun-CIL
en-DOWED he says EN-doed
(-DOW- is rendered "doe" -- in my language, an "endo" is an action in which a cycle rider flies over the handlebars.)
di-MIN-ish he says DIM-inish
per-SUA-ded he says PER-su-aid-ed
con-TIN-ue he says CON-tinue
ac-cuм-u-la-ted he says AC-cuм-u-LA-ted
etc.

Once you get acclimated to it, it's not so bad, but I have to admit, the first time
I tried to listen to this recording I was entirely lost. I was not getting it.


Here is a really excellent section:


30:47
As far as I know there is nothing in the Catholic Faith that says we should stop
using our common sense, that we should stop using our intelligence. If there
is, you let me know...
31:46
That is why without any spirit of rebellion, bitterness or resentment,
we pursue our  work  of forming priests
with the timeless Magisterium as our guide.
We are persuaded that we can render no  greater  service to the Holy Catholic
Church, the sovereign pontiff and to posterity.
So we just have to continue as we are, and one day they will come back
to their senses -- if only because they will see the ruins that have accuмulated.
They will understand one day that they are a dying breed, and We will be there,
solid as a rock, to help them when thus they come: when they will show us
they really want to save the Church. And they will show this to us when they
will stop preaching error, when they will stop allowing new mass, the new to
be said; that will be the sign -- when they will scrap away the Council and
the new mass.

Fourth argument ... 33:12

By listening carefully several times, and hearing short segments several times
over again, I am able to hear all the words and then I can understand the content.

What a fantastic sermon - very honest and now will he be put on the shelf like the others?  He is very brave.  He mentions how Fr Fox has now been sent to a monastery for 3 weeks to be in silence till his District Superior returns just for preaching what the society has always preached.  What I don't get is how can Bp Fellay condone his move against these priests when they are just adhering to the Truth as the Society has always declared it.  I surely hope the Dist Sups who attend the Gen Chap will DO something to calm this chaos.  A SSPX priest told me they could ask for a renewed vote for Bp Fellay to depose him, but will that happen?  We'll see.

Fr. Pfeiffer has put his finger on the explanation for this enigma you observe:
"What I don't get is how can Bp Fellay condone his move against these priests
when they are just adhering to the Truth as the Society has always declared it."
Fr. Pfeiffer identifies how +Fellay has re-defined Tradition by his actions, not by
honestly rendering a definition. This is the way Pierre Teilhard de Chardin spread
his evolution of language. He simply started using words in new contexts, with
different meanings implied by their use, and told his friends (in secret) that by
doing so, you can change the meaning of tradition.

So Bishop Fellay has taken a lesson from the heretic, P.T. de Chardin, perhaps
under the approval of B16, with the intention, apparently, of destroying the Faith
as we know it. This, while his office is to protect the Faith as we know it.

Quote from: Neil Obstat

Fr. Pfeiffer has put his finger on the explanation for this enigma you observe:
"What I don't get is how can Bp Fellay condone his move against these priests
when they are just adhering to the Truth as the Society has always declared it."
Fr. Pfeiffer identifies how +Fellay has re-defined Tradition by his actions, not by
honestly rendering a definition. This is the way Pierre Teilhard de Chardin spread
his evolution of language. He simply started using words in new contexts, with
different meanings implied by their use, and told his friends (in secret) that by
doing so, you can change the meaning of tradition.

So Bishop Fellay has taken a lesson from the heretic, P.T. de Chardin, perhaps
under the approval of B16, with the intention, apparently, of destroying the Faith
as we know it. This, while his office is to protect the Faith as we know it.

I don't understand...are you saying that as Bp Fellay punishes these priests for declaring the same things ABL said that these statements are now considered changed? I see how the priests are being intimidated into keeping silent, but I don't see the change.

The "change" is happening in the imagination of +Fellay. He has a power complex.
He thinks he can change the meaning of words by using them in a new way. I
mentioned de Chardin because he did that in the 1930's! Hey, if +Fellay could have
punished his own founder, he would have! But he doesn't go that far. Why not?
Only for practical reasons. He would lose some (not all!) of his following!

You should listen to Fr. Pfeiffer's sermon and then you'll have a better grip on this.
It's the one for July 29th, the 9th Sunday after Pentecost. Listen to the whole
thing, maybe twice. I think this is near the middle. I would go so far as to say it's
the major thrust of the whole sermon, or close to it.