http://tradcatresist.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-following-comments-source-that.html?m=1

Ps: These nuns are headed by arch-accordist Fr. Simoulin’s sister, and are the same ones who made their pilgrimage to Rome a year or two ago symbolizing their capitulation (as the SSPX did in 2000).

Original here: 
http://resistance.vraiforum.com/t842-Cours-sur-la-resistance.htm

Despite all their flaws, at least, unlike yourself, they're not Modernist.

I am not a Modernist. Resistance priests believe in BOD and fiercely attack all forms of Sedevacantism, so I think I’m closer to them than you are.
Believing in BOD does not make one a Modernist, nor does arguing that traditional Orthodox are closer to us than N. O Catholics theologically speaking( which is a fact)   I reject Vatican 2, view the New Mass as ilicit, and gravitate towards Fr. Chazal’s position on the Papacy. 

Banezian,

Thank you for continuing to post on Cathinfo.

The Resistance membership here, uses your comments as a guide for understanding the twisted logic & thought processes of neo-SSPX seminarians.

You are a good example. May the liberated Dominican Sisters invite you to preach anti-Resistance in their schools one day.

Reminder: Be sure not to stare too long or engage in meaningless chatty with the girls when you go there.

The problem with the Resistance is that they constantly slander the Society and throw tantrums over largely  inconsequential things.

Is the potential agreement with Rome inconsequential?  Because if +Fellay wasn't moving in that direction then the Resistance would've never formed.

If you want to be fair, you have to recognize that most of the Resistance priests were kicked out for speaking out against V2, new-rome and the deal.  When you start limiting debate on an issue in an organization, you necessarily draw a line in the sand which creates "sides".  Once you start kicking out priests for continuing to express their opinions, then you create opposition.  So who created the Resistance, except +Fellay himself?

Dear Banezian
Please read Archbishop Lefebvre, I will pray for you.

BTW, I ought to say that I largely agree with Bp. Williamson that a doctrinal agreement with Rome is not the best way to go right now. Fr. Gleize says the same  thing.
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/3251-towards-a-doctrinal-agreement

The problem with the Resistance is that they constantly slander the Society and throw tantrums over largely  inconsequential things.

1. Did you know that slander can be a grave sin? You shouldn't throw that term around like rice after a wedding. You're accusing the whole Resistance of grave sin? I'll clue you in (since you don't have a clue): you can't commit slander against an organization, only against a human being. The Resistance certainly believes what it says to be true, which precludes slander (which always involves falsehood).

Criticizing the position of an organization can't be any sin of the tongue. More like speaking our opinion, which is the type of free speech in agreement with the Catholic Faith.

2. The Resistance has plenty of legitimate criticisms of the new SSPX orientation. Spend some time reading. No one in the SSPX has been able to show that Bp. Zendejas, Bp. Williamson, the Dominicans, the Benedictines in Brazil, or any of the other countless priests have changed or adopted a single new doctrine, to explain their departure from the SSPX. It's clear the SSPX has changed. The neo-SSPX might pride themselves on a slow-boil, but some frogs have had thermometers and have wisely jumped from the water before they're served up for dinner. Enter the Resistance.

Banezian, you're a 19 year old kid who has a very loud mouth.  That's not a good combination.  You should be listening and learning from the many people on this forum who are wiser, more intelligent, and more experienced than you.  

You were barely 12 years old when +Williamson and so many others were kicked out of the SSPX because they did what they always had done, warned the faithful of spiritual danger.  And now you want to tell the rest of us who were in the thick of it "how things are"?

For you to come on a Resistance-friendly forum and start trashing +Williamson and other good priests (and by extension, all of the faithful who agree with them) who hold what the Society has always stood for takes a truck load of nerve.