Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7

Author Topic: Excommunicated: Fathers Cekada, Dolan, Jenkins, Kelly and Sanborn ?  (Read 14119 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SimonJude

Re: Excommunicated: Fathers Cekada, Dolan, Jenkins, Kelly and Sanborn ?
« Reply #25 on: November 28, 2025, 10:57:41 PM »
Quote from: Incredulous on November 26, 2025, 11:23:37 AM

Bishop Williamson chose wisely in deciding to major in music rather than Canon Law.

I've often pondered what the Bishop's boyhood dinner table conversations were like when his Dad came home from a long day working at the Zionist Brit retailer. Marks Spencer.


:laugh1:
:laugh1::laugh2::laugh1::laugh2:
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Excommunicated: Fathers Cekada, Dolan, Jenkins, Kelly and Sanborn ?
« Reply #26 on: November 29, 2025, 07:17:41 AM »
Quote from: Freind on November 28, 2025, 01:31:31 PM
Property is not a spiritual matter.



Could you please take some refresher classes in reading comprehension?  At no point is the term limited to "spiritual matters", but the distinction is between personal matters and matters related to their office.  Property can be related to the office ... if it's ecclesiastical property but not if it's personal property.  If the bishop inherits a house from his parents, that's personal, and someone could sue a cleric over it without incurring the penalty.  Property such as churches, schools, rectories etc. ... that pertain to the exercise of his duties as Bishop ... they are covered under this Canon.  Has nothing to do with "spiritual", fool.

Only possible out is whether this delict would fall under the second section (excommunication reserved simpliciter) or suspension, since the Archbishop had already resigned both his office as Bishop of Tulle and his Titular office in Phrygia.  If because he resigned there's no excommunication reserved to the Holy See, there would be a suspension from office, as per the last section.
Logged

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Excommunicated: Fathers Cekada, Dolan, Jenkins, Kelly and Sanborn ?
« Reply #27 on: November 29, 2025, 08:51:55 AM »
Quote from: Incredulous on November 28, 2025, 12:58:55 PM
Bottomline, SSPX altar missals are without Quo Primum.

I don't know what happened to you over the years, why you've been so bitter the past few years, what axe you have to grind against the classic SSPX position and +ABL -- but you're wrong.

The 1962 Missale is completely Tridentine and does have Quo Primum at the beginning.

And you can't blame +ABL personally for the Holy Week changes under Pope Pius XII, nor the addition of St. Joseph to the canon in 1962.

I see you're an "extra special" sedevacantist (now), rejecting even Pope Pius XII.  So you think you're more Trad than all the SSPX/Resistance (which is a HUGE % of Trads), and moreover you think you are better than most sedevacantists as well. Get over yourself!

I know, not everyone is as smart or special as you. You have to out-Trad the Trads, and be a special boy even among the remnant.

What's the point of even being Trad if you spiral off into left field and completely "lose it"? There are more ways to lose the Faith -- or your soul -- than to leave Tradition and re-join the Novus Ordo (just picking a path that most of us would consider horrifying).

Always remember what the actual purpose of Tradition is: to make sure you're still Catholic when this Crisis is all over.

Sure, worshipping and believing like a Lutheran would represent a loss of the Faith.
But so would adopting an end-times cult, thinking you're one of a few hundred remaining Catholics, thinking you alone have the truth, most Popes in the past were invalid, and completely rejecting the doctrine of Church and Papal infallibility. That would ALSO represent a loss of the Faith.
It doesn't bother you that even most fellow sedevacantists think you're crazy (about Pius XII)?
Logged

Offline ArmandLouis

Re: Excommunicated: Fathers Cekada, Dolan, Jenkins, Kelly and Sanborn ?
« Reply #28 on: November 29, 2025, 11:44:28 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on November 29, 2025, 07:17:41 AM
Could you please take some refresher classes in reading comprehension?  At no point is the term limited to "spiritual matters", but the distinction is between personal matters and matters related to their office.  Property can be related to the office ... if it's ecclesiastical property but not if it's personal property.  If the bishop inherits a house from his parents, that's personal, and someone could sue a cleric over it without incurring the penalty.  Property such as churches, schools, rectories etc. ... that pertain to the exercise of his duties as Bishop ... they are covered under this Canon.  Has nothing to do with "spiritual", fool.

Only possible out is whether this delict would fall under the second section (excommunication reserved simpliciter) or suspension, since the Archbishop had already resigned both his office as Bishop of Tulle and his Titular office in Phrygia.  If because he resigned there's no excommunication reserved to the Holy See, there would be a suspension from office, as per the last section.
Canon 2341 applies to the episcopal office itself, not to a specific diocese or titular see



Logged

Offline Incredulous

Re: Excommunicated: Fathers Cekada, Dolan, Jenkins, Kelly and Sanborn ?
« Reply #29 on: November 29, 2025, 12:46:17 PM »
Quote from: Matthew on November 29, 2025, 08:51:55 AM
I don't know what happened to you over the years, why you've been so bitter the past few years, what axe you have to grind against the classic SSPX position and +ABL -- but you're wrong.

The 1962 Missale is completely Tridentine and does have Quo Primum at the beginning.

And you can't blame +ABL personally for the Holy Week changes under Pope Pius XII, nor the addition of St. Joseph to the canon in 1962.

I see you're an "extra special" sedevacantist (now), rejecting even Pope Pius XII.  So you think you're more Trad than all the SSPX/Resistance (which is a HUGE % of Trads), and moreover you think you are better than most sedevacantists as well. Get over yourself!

I know, not everyone is as smart or special as you. You have to out-Trad the Trads, and be a special boy even among the remnant.

What's the point of even being Trad if you spiral off into left field and completely "lose it"? There are more ways to lose the Faith -- or your soul -- than to leave Tradition and re-join the Novus Ordo (just picking a path that most of us would consider horrifying).

Always remember what the actual purpose of Tradition is: to make sure you're still Catholic when this Crisis is all over.

Sure, worshipping and believing like a Lutheran would represent a loss of the Faith.
But so would adopting an end-times cult, thinking you're one of a few hundred remaining Catholics, thinking you alone have the truth, most Popes in the past were invalid, and completely rejecting the doctrine of Church and Papal infallibility. That would ALSO represent a loss of the Faith.
It doesn't bother you that even most fellow sedevacantists think you're crazy (about Pius XII)?

Thank you Matthew.

Pope Pius XII compromised on the Liturgy and +ABL knew it and he knew his seminarians, Father Jenkins, et al. would not accept the 1962 Missal so he planned to expel them from Econe... to keep up relations with Rome.  

Your broach of topic on, "What sedes believe" is quite interesting.   I suggest you take a poll to learn what all the sedes on Cathinfo believe.  We might find some astonishing results.

Lastly, when you and Trento have some time on your hands, you should listen to Father Hesse's analysis of Pius XII's pontificate.  It's very troubling and if you can refute any of his charges, it may bolster the search for the truth on when modernism infiltrated the Vatican.

Fr. Hesse: Freemasonic infiltration in the Vatican, Secretary of State, Opus Dei (Remastered Audio)

A Blessed Advent to you!






Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7
« previous next »