There's no real evidence that +Vigano isn't writing his own articles.

Even if +Vigano were to write out a letter on video and hold it up to the camera, they would claim that someone else composed it and he just committed it to memory.  This is a form of calumny and Mattei needs to go to confession.

I don't care whether Viganò uses a typewriter, a typist, a ghost writer, or whatever, as long as he says: "These writings were published under my name, and yes, they express my positions, and yes, I wanted them published."

There have been Italians, who doubted his authorship more than a year or so ago. One Conciliar "priest" wrote about it on some Italian blog. He noticed a change in style in the "Archbishop"s writings. Also, several commenters agreed. This enforced my already existing suspicions. I thought the whole Trump hype was somewhat understandable, but ultimately rather soft-headed.

I don't care about Roberto de Mattei. Even he had published an article in the Italian "Il Tempo" titled "Trump won, now Pope Bergoglio will turn leader of the international leftísts" or similar.

Here on CI, people are waiting for Viganò being consecrated in the rite of the Church, waiting for Viganò accepting the resistance, or even joining the resistance. I don't see any sign that Viganò might be ready to join hollowhoaxdeniers (Williamson).

All want to see a sign. I'm not special. I want to see that the Viganò writings published during the plandemic really are of his.

Marion-

Brian McCall notes that Vigano has personally given several speeches or conferences in the past year (eg., Jericho; Catholic Identity Conference; 2-3 more), in which the Archbishop has said substantially the same things regarding V2 and the Great Reset as in the letters in which Mattei pretends to find stylistic discrepancies.

Does he have a body double too?

As to this absurd and unfounded accusation that there is some secret behind the scenes author, how does Professor De Mattei explain the fact that many of the interventions of the past year are transcripts of conferences given by Archbishop Viganò personally and recorded in video or audio form (until YouTube deletes them). For example, his text from the Catholic Identity Conference was delivered via video. His speech at the Jericho March in Washington was also preserved in video as was his speech to the Venice Philosophy Festival. Does Professor De Mattei think that there is some Archbishop Viganò impersonator who gave these recorded lectures? The Archbishop himself publicly denied this scurrilous accusation (although I guess De Mattei might claim that was merely his double speaking).