trento:
I am honestly surprised, at this point in time, that anyone would still come to the defense of a Superior General, who obviously used +Williamson's open discussion of 911, the h0Ɩ0cαųst and other world events to justify HE's dismissal. Fellay and his collaborators never questioned HE's facts. They simply stated ad nauseum that he had spoken imprudently. They did so, I firmly believe, because they are beholden to Jєωιѕн influence, and are awash in Jєωιѕн money.
Archbishop Vigano speaks and writes often and strongly about a host of issues on "world politics." Are trento, and others who agree with him, equally critical of this cleric who does not hesitate for a moment to comment on world affairs?
If I'm not mistaken, +Williamson also penned an open letter asking for the resignation of his SG. The task to elect and remove a SG rightly belongs to the General Chapter. Both +Tissier and +deG were also critical of any purely practical agreement. +Williamson's fascination with political matters did incur an order to cease the KE series, which +Williamson considers as his ministry, which another poster has shown is false as a ministry can only be given by a superior.