Laisney then continues in this Modernist Manifesto:
Now when we study the book of nature, we find fossils that “tell” us that they are very old. Did God create dead fossils that appear to be so old, but in fact never lived? Were they created dead? Not a single Father of the Church ever claimed that! We should rather believe that God is as true in the Book of Nature as in the Scriptures!
...
At the end of your reflections you mention the principle of uniformity. This principle states simply that the Laws of nature, as we know them today, have been the same since the beginning of creation and shall remain the same until the end of time. Such principle is most certainly not opposed to the faith.
Here we have Laisney bowing down to the "Goddess Reason" (of French Revolution fame), equating the "Book of Nature" with the Sacred Scriptures. On one level, it's true that God authored both nature and Sacred Scripture, but to elevate nature to being on the same footing as Supernatural Revelation is borderline blasphemous.
Of course, what Laisney is promoting here is not that NATURE is on the same footing as Scripture, but rather that MODERN SCIENCE (who INTERPRET fossils being "very old") has the same degree of AUTHORITY and INERRANCY as the Sacred Scriptures ... nay, rather, more. If there's a contradiction between the interpretations (often admittedly driven by an atheistic agenda) of Modern Science and the Sacred Scriptures, it is the Sacred Scriptures that must give way, and the interpretations thereof by the Church Fathers, and so now we must throw overboard the Church Fathers as
ignorami and also do violence to Sacred Scripture, to the point of saying there can be scientific or historical error in Sacred Scripture. Since the Sacred Scriptures did not "intend" to teach about science (also parroted by Father Peter Scott), that equates to there potentially being scientific ERROR in Sacred Scripture.
So, in other words, Modern Science is more inerrant than Sacred Scripture, and Lyell and Darwin were more enlightened and intelligent than the Church Fathers. Disgusting.
Modern Science's claim that fossils are "very old" has been thoroughly debunked.
Modern Science has been driven by a deliberate and conscious AGENDA to destroy faith and to undermine the Scriptures. In fact, the term "uniformity" (i.e. the principle of "uniformitarianism") was coined by Charles Lyell, a bosom buddy and pen pal of Charles Darwin. In the correspondence between these two scuм, Lyell admits to basically making it all up, and not caring whether it's true or not, so long as with it he can gut Christianity and the Sacred Scriptures. Darwin said similar things.
So here we have a Traditional Catholic championing the scientific philosophy of two avowed enemies of the Church who admit to making things up precisely to undermine Sacred Scripture over Sacred Scripture itself.
So when Laisney is pretending to praise the Book of Nature, he's actually championing the Book of Darwin and Lyell over the Sacred Scriptures.
This is wicked, and Laisney needs to be rejected as a manifest heretic and a non-Catholic. If he does not convert, he'll indeed find out the true Catholic meaning of the term, "Outside the Church There Is No Salvation".
BTW, Big Bang theorists (among whom we have Robinson, Laisney, etc.) only cling to this magical (and admittedly made-up by a vowed enemy of Christianity) "law" of "uniformitarianism" when it's convenient to attack Sacred Scriptures. Otherwise, as the Big Bang began to fail, its proponents have had to invent a period of time where the laws of nature were "suspended" or "different" ... to account for serious problems with it.
Of course, even outside of "uniformitarianism", the Big Bang VIOLATES the known laws of nature, the first and second laws of thermodynamics, the first being that matter and energy cannot be created (or destroyed), the second, of entropy, one facet of which is that disorganization / chaos cannot ever tend toward organization / order.
But these absolute and sacrosanct "laws of nature" (per Laisney) only remain inviolate when convenient in order to attack Sacred Scripture. For, you see, God cannot violate them during Creation, but Mother Goddess Nature can certainly do so ... when the math behind Big Bang starts to fail.