| - + |
Videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0-2EkidP5o (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0-2EkidP5o)
(https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi-mtq73cD6AhWqkYkEHanpAcgQwqsBegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DD0-2EkidP5o&usg=AOvVaw3moJYDTHCFypMVaVF8KstL)(https://i.imgur.com/UU4EJ9u.jpg)
(https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi-mtq73cD6AhWqkYkEHanpAcgQwqsBegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DD0-2EkidP5o&usg=AOvVaw3moJYDTHCFypMVaVF8KstL)
(https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi-mtq73cD6AhWqkYkEHanpAcgQwqsBegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DD0-2EkidP5o&usg=AOvVaw3moJYDTHCFypMVaVF8KstL)30:41
(https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi-mtq73cD6AhWqkYkEHanpAcgQwqsBegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DD0-2EkidP5o&usg=AOvVaw3moJYDTHCFypMVaVF8KstL)Catholic Sermon : The Devil is Smart - Fr. Chazal, MCSPX
· TradCath Sermons
(https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi-mtq73cD6AhWqkYkEHanpAcgQwqsBegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DD0-2EkidP5o&usg=AOvVaw3moJYDTHCFypMVaVF8KstL) (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi-mtq73cD6AhWqkYkEHanpAcgQwqsBegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DD0-2EkidP5o&usg=AOvVaw3moJYDTHCFypMVaVF8KstL)Feb 13, 2020
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfPJIVdA4UY)(https://i.imgur.com/5IKWEDV.jpg)
Preview
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfPJIVdA4UY)
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfPJIVdA4UY)15:02
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfPJIVdA4UY)Sermon : Priests Have Become Sewers of Impurity - Fr. Chazal ...
· TradCath Sermons
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfPJIVdA4UY) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfPJIVdA4UY)Sep 20, 2021
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfPJIVdA4UY)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfPJIVdA4UY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfPJIVdA4UY)
Interesting. Father Chazal says he has a new seminarian from South Korea, who had been expelled from the SSPX for disagreeing with Father Paul Robinson's book.Yikes. Wouldn't have thought the SSPX is already at that stage...
Interesting. Father Chazal says he has a new seminarian from South Korea, who had been expelled from the SSPX for disagreeing with Father Paul Robinson's book.Seems to me Fr. Chazal should not be advertising the personal info of his seminarians.
Seems to me Fr. Chazal should not be advertising the personal info of his seminarians.
Interesting. Father Chazal says he has a new seminarian from South Korea, who had been expelled from the SSPX for disagreeing with Father Paul Robinson's book.
That video was from 2020, so it's not "new" information. What I heard from my sources rather, was that he was expelled for insisting geocentrism as dogma.
Is Father Chazal a geo-centrist,Yes!
Well, the Holy Office considered it at least proximate to faith, and heliocentrism to be heresy. Is Father Chazal a geo-centrist, and, if not, would this young man consider Father Chazal a heretic?Is heliocentrism still considered a heresy even before the Council?
I doubt that he was only concerned about the heliocentrism in Father Robison's book ... but more about Big Bang and evolution.
This notion that he held geocentrism to be dogma is very likely a misunderstanding of holding that Father Robinson's book is heretical, and I would agree with that. I'm guessing that your sources do not have the full story.
There can never… be any real discrepancy between the theologian and the physicist, as long as each confines himself within his own lines, and both are careful, as St. Augustine warns us, 'not to make rash assertions, or to assert what is not known as known.'"
The Holy Ghost, Who spoke by them [the sacred writers], did not intend to teach men these things—that is the essential nature of the things of the universe... [which principle] will apply to cognate sciences…"
From the apologetics work Radio Replies volume 4 (Vol 4 (http://www.radioreplies.info/radio-replies-vol-4.php) : 1,650 questions and answers on Catholicism, Protestantism, Judaism, Paganism and Communism from the radio information session over the 13 years from 1941 to 1954.)
459. Has the Copernican system been accepted by all astronomers?
As opposed to the geocentric system of Ptolemy, Copernicus taught the heliocentric system, holding that the earth revolves around the sun. He arrived at that idea as a result of his studies of the movements of the sun and moon and planets which he undertook in the interests of reforming the calendar. And his conclusion has been accepted by all astronomers. No one today would dream of disputing it.
Incredible! Hard to believe such a good work as Radio Replies would put forth such a scandalously erroneous answer as they clearly do above. I checked it out for myself at http://www.radioreplies.info/site-search.php?q=copernicus&db=4 (http://www.radioreplies.info/site-search.php?q=copernicus&db=4) and sure enough Radio Replies Volume 4 published in 1954 does indeed state the above!
As declared by Pope Leo XIII in Providentissimus Deus (http://w2.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_l-xiii_enc_18111893_providentissimus-deus.html), science cannot contradict the Faith:
Even today, many commonly-held tenets of natural science are merely theories, not certainties. This is not the case with the Catholic Faith, which is a certainty.
The Church’s magisterium authoritatively teaches on the correct interpretation of Sacred Scripture. As Pope Pius XII taught in Divino Afflatu Spiritu (http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_p-xii_enc_30091943_divino-afflante-spiritu.html):
Providentissimus Deus also states that Scripture does not give scientific explanations and many of its texts use “figurative language” or expressions “commonly used at the time”, still used today “even by the most eminent men of science” (like the word “sunrise”). Such expressions are not scientific teachings about the cosmic world.
So Catholics should not use the Bible to assert explanations about natural science, but may in good conscience hold to any particular cosmic theory. Being faithful to the Church’s magisterium, the Society of St. Pius X holds fast to these principles: no more and no less.
just like Bishop Williamson was expelled for expressing an opinion about a historical (or non-historical) event.Any mention on CI as to whether or not Bp. W is a FE or GE?
Any mention on CI as to whether or not Bp. W is a FE or GE?
I've not heard of His Excellency having an opinion on the matter. I know that the group "Flat Earth Trads" are/were Resistance supporters, and support Bishop Williamson, but I do not believe that the feeling is mutual.
I've not heard of His Excellency having an opinion on the matter. I know that the group "Flat Earth Trads" are/were Resistance supporters, and support Bishop Williamson, but I do not believe that the feeling is mutual.When you were in the seminary was there ever any classroom discussion regarding geocentrism vs heliocentrism and if so what was the consensus, if any? I am of the impression that the subject was more or less ignored. I don't think His Excellency had much interest in it.
(Answer to the question "Is Fr. Chazal a geo-centrist...")
Yes!
Excerpt from a letter of Fr. François Laisney published at https://therealistguide.com/blog/f/fr-laisneys-support-of-the-realist-guide
“You joined some thoughts about a sentence in Fr Paul Robinson’s excellent book The Realist Guide to Religion and Science, questioning what he writes ‘against a geographically universal flood.’ It is quite providential that your letter arrives so close after the feast of the Ascension. Indeed, the homily of St Gregory at Matins of that feast sheds light on that very matter. In the third reading of that homily, ninth lesson of Matins, St Gregory says:
When then, He had rebuked the hardness of their heart, what command did He give them? Let us hear. "Go ye into all the world and preach the Gospel to every creature." Was the Holy Gospel, then my brethren, to be preached to thing insensate, or to brute beasts, that the Lord said to His disciples: "Preach the Gospel to every creature"? Nay, but by the words "every creature" we must understand man, in whom are combined qualities of all creatures. Being he hath in common with stones, life in common with trees, feeling in common with beasts, understanding in common with angels. If, then, man hath something in common with every creature, man is to a certain extent every creature. The Gospel, then, if it be preached to man only, is preached to every creature.
Now let us reflect on what St Gregory teaches. Our Lord Jesus Christ said: ‘preach the Gospel to every creature.’ And St Gregory explains: it does not apply to every creature, but only to every man. Thus, we are not obliged to go onto the moon to preach to the stones there, nor to go to Mars or Venus, nor any other planet or star. We may stay on the earth and even there, we are not obliged to preach to every penguin in Antarctica: it is sufficient to preach to every man.
Similarly, when Moses says in the book of Genesis “And the waters prevailed beyond measure upon the earth: and all the high mountains under the whole heaven were covered – opertique sunt omnes montes excelsi sub universo caelo” (Gen. 7:19), it is sufficient to say: it covered the whole heaven where men were living, so that all men were engulfed in the Flood, not necessarily the top of Mount Everest, because there was no one there, nor anywhere around, because men had not yet spread over the earth: it was before the tower of Babel.
Do you see the parallel of such interpretation with that of St Gregory? As St Gregory is not opposed to the truth of the Gospel when he applies the universality of the words of our Lord merely to all men, so is Fr Paul Robinson not opposed to the truth of Genesis when he applies the universality of the flood merely to all men. He does not say the Scriptures is wrong, he says its universality is that of all men (and women!). Such interpretation is not a denial of the inerrancy of the Scriptures, it is rather proposing the right interpretation of the Scriptures and is in perfect conformity with St Gregory according to the exegetical principals of St Thomas Aquinas and St Augustine.
I'm not sure how this exegesis advances the theory of Fr. Robinson: According to Abbe Laisney's application of this hermeneutic (i.e., the flood need not be universal; it suffices that it covered all the lands where men lived), the flood would still have had to have been universal, since men were located in nearly every region of the world, even if perhaps not on the mountain tops. So to destroy all men in all parts of the inhabited world, how does the flood not need to be universal?
The only way this hermeneutic works, if if all men inhabited only one region of the world (which I have never heard anyone advance).
He [Fr. Chazal] isn't a geo-centrist, .
Abbe Laisney mentioned in that letter that the Flood was before the Tower of Babel, after which men spread throughout the world. It was estimated that the Tower of Babel happened about 100 years after the Flood.
When you were in the seminary was there ever any classroom discussion regarding geocentrism vs heliocentrism and if so what was the consensus, if any? I am of the impression that the subject was more or less ignored. I don't think His Excellency had much interest in it.
For what it's worth, I have no strong opinions about it, but I agreed with him that the symbolism of the sun representing Christ makes more sense in helio-centrism.
Excerpt from a letter of Fr. François Laisney
Similarly, when Moses says in the book of Genesis “And the waters prevailed beyond measure upon the earth: and all the high mountains under the whole heaven were covered
...
[This does] not necessarily [mean] the top of Mount Everest, because there was no one there, nor anywhere around, because men had not yet spread over the earth: it was before the tower of Babel.
Now when we study the book of nature, we find fossils that “tell” us that they are very old. Did God create dead fossils that appear to be so old, but in fact never lived? Were they created dead? Not a single Father of the Church ever claimed that! We should rather believe that God is as true in the Book of Nature as in the Scriptures!
...
At the end of your reflections you mention the principle of uniformity. This principle states simply that the Laws of nature, as we know them today, have been the same since the beginning of creation and shall remain the same until the end of time. Such principle is most certainly not opposed to the faith.
Speaking of fossils, let us not forget the very Father of Modernism, Teilhard de Chardin.
de Chardin conspired with a Charles Dawson to fabricate the Piltdown Man hoax to bolster evolution ... something now universally recognized not only as wrong, but as having been a DELIBERATE HOAX.
de Chardin largely started the assault on Sacred Scripture.
At one point, the Kolbe Institute put together a disturbing account of some vision/encounter de Chardin had that set him on his path to destroy the Faith. It was clearly a diabolical vision. I'll see if I can find it somewhere.
https://ca-rc.com/eternal-hell (https://ca-rc.com/eternal-hell)
Eternal Hell
- (https://ca-rc.com/image/cache/catalog/Books/eternal-hell-cover-front-380x380.png) (https://ca-rc.com/image/cache/catalog/Books/eternal-hell-cover-front-500x500.png)
- +
Fatima, July 13th, 1917
The Blessed Virgin opened her hands like in the preceding months. The ray of projected light seemed to penetrate the ground and we saw like a great sea of fire.
In it the devils were plunged with souls resembling transparent and black or tanned embers in human form.
They were floating in the conflagration, carried by flames coming from all sides, like sparks of great fires, without weight nor balance, in the midst of horrible cries and horrible shoutings of pain and despair, which made us shiver and tremble with horror. […]
The devils were distinguished by horrible and repugnant forms of hideous and unknown beasts, like black embers, both ablaze and transparent.
That vision lasted only one instant, and we must thank our Mother of Heaven who had prepared us in advance, promising us to take us with Her in Heaven; otherwise we would have died of terror and fright.
“A reading and deep reflection of the book Eternal Hell by Fr. Chazal has the power to enlighten minds and transform souls with the same holy efficacy of an Ignatian Retreat. Yes, it contains that much worldly detoxification and spiritual rejuvenation, i.e., that many life-altering gems of Catholic truth, within its pages. It’s a spiritual masterpiece we would want to place in the hands of as many Catholics and Christians that we can reach – especially those nearest and dearest to us. There is no greater or more urgent work of mercy than to help redirect as many souls as we are able away from Hell and towards Heaven, with this potent new missionary tool.” – Hugh Akins, Publisher
https://ca-rc.com/eternal-hell (https://ca-rc.com/eternal-hell)PREFACE
Eternal Hell
- (https://ca-rc.com/image/cache/catalog/Books/eternal-hell-cover-front-380x380.png) (https://ca-rc.com/image/cache/catalog/Books/eternal-hell-cover-front-500x500.png)
- +
List of Examples
1 Death of General V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2 Death of Voltaire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3 Death of Robespierre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4 Death of Raymond Diocres . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5 Death of Collot d’Herbois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
6 Death of Antiochus Epiphanes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
7 Death of Hunerick, King of the Vandals . . . . . . . . . 47
8 Death of Zeno, Emperor of Constantinople . . . . . . . 57
9 Death of Diderot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
10 Death of the Dutch Printer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
11 Death of the Rich Man Crisorius . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
12 Death of the Comedian of Palermo . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
13 Death of Emperor Valentinian I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
14 Death of King Lothar II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
15 Death of Redbad, King of Frisia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
16 Sinner of Naples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
17 Leipzig Horsetrader . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
18 Cut in Half . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
19 “Nobody Knows, Nobody Believes” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
20 Anko-Anko, Peru . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
21 Two Belgian Libertines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
22 Imprudent and Obstinate Mother . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
23 Glutton of Cuneo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
24 Saint Francis Borgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
25 Notre-Dame de l’Osier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
26 Mount Hiboc Hiboc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
27 Martinique Eruption of 1902 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
28 Demonic Poem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
29 Four Witty Priests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
30 Trithelmus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
31 “How Do You Know?” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
32 Versailles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260
33 Mysterious Grumpy Boy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
34 Complicated Case of Fr. Pallota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
35 Death of Louis XV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
36 “Where Are You Now?” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
37 Lady With the Golden Bracelet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
38 Mother Mariana of Quito . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
39 Parisian Synod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
40 The Three Merchants of Gubbio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
I just wish Father had published a PDF (or other electornic) edition of the book to purchase and download. I can't find one.Hope folks can spend a little bit extra to help a most worthy and long standing traditional Catholic Apostolate headed up by Hugh Akins, the publisher of Eternal Hell by Fr. Chazal by buying the regular print edition.
Hope folks can spend a little bit extra to help a most worthy and long standing traditional Catholic Apostolate headed up by Hugh Akins, the publisher of Eternal Hell by Fr. Chazal by buying the regular print edition.
Uhm, no. it is not my intent to steal. I'd rather have an electronic copy for portability and also to be able to search the text, to get it right away, etc. And it's not about saving monney. I'd be willing to pay the same price as for the Print Edition. I don't appreciate the condescending insinuation.
Why is Hugh Akins trying to cash in on Father Chazal's work anyway? If I were Father and wanted this book to have great reach, I would publish it in PDF for free and then put in a request for a $10 donation for anyone who reads the book and finds it to have been of value.
Please don't read what isn't there. No one said, implied, or insinuated that it was your intent to steal! And no one is questioning your legitimate preference to "have an electronic copy for portability and also to be able to search the text, to get it right away, etc."
Dear Friends, please be advised that none of the titles we publish are offered as pdf e-books. We publish hard-copy print editions only, not electronic ones. And yet we have become aware that there are a number of online entities that are selling our books in pdf electronic format. Let it be known they have NOT been authorized to do so; they are selling our books WITHOUT our permission; in other words, they are STEALING from us, appropriating profits they have no moral or legal right to, in flagrant violation of God’s 7th commandment forbidding theft.
I just wish Father had published a PDF (or other electornic) edition of the book to purchase and download. I can't find one.Yeah, no reading outside the US...
Setting aside my personal preference for hard copy books, I sent an email today to Mr. Hugh Akins with a copy to Fr. Chazal, in which I strongly implored him to "revisit" the question of E-Book publication. I expressed my belief that in today's day and age, in order to achieve an exponentially greater dissemination of much needed traditional Catholic literature, it is absolutely essential that E-Book publication be an integral part of the equation.
cf: https://www.blueleaf-book-scanning.com/book_scanning_service_order.html (https://www.blueleaf-book-scanning.com/book_scanning_service_order.html)
https://www.microsystems.com.au/book-scanning-what-does-it-cost/ (https://www.microsystems.com.au/book-scanning-what-does-it-cost/)
https://www.quora.com/How-much-does-it-cost-to-digitize-a-printed-book (https://www.quora.com/How-much-does-it-cost-to-digitize-a-printed-book)
,ttps://kitaboo.com/switching-epublishing-from-traditional-books/ (https://kitaboo.com/switching-epublishing-from-traditional-books/)
Did Father write this book with pencil and paper?If I recall correctly, Akins said it was a rough hand written composition and he, Atkins, had great difficulties in getting it all put together properly.
I just found out from Mr. Akins that Father sent it to him electronically.
Did Father write this book with pencil and paper?
Also, Fr. Chazal let me know that a french translation of the work is already half done.
It's curious / ironic that Fr. Chazal would write in English only to have it translated back into French.
... expelled for insisting geocentrism as dogma.
Not really in so much as he presumably wanted to get an English edition out first to a bigger potential market. In any event, feel free to inquire of him. Fr. Chazal is Fr. Chazal.
I was very happy to read the first sentence of his preface to this book: "Dear Reader, after this book on eternal death, I shall write another one on eternal life called Eternal Crown, the two of which will be called Eternity, because "man shall go into the house of his eternity" (Eccles.12:5).