Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Eleison Comments - White Identity II (no. 709)  (Read 590 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31168
  • Reputation: +27088/-494
  • Gender: Male
Eleison Comments - White Identity II (no. 709)
« on: February 12, 2021, 09:37:22 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Number DCCIX (709)
    February 13, 2021
    White Identity – II
    Men’s deepest split is not, Gentiles or Jєωs,
    But which, of Christ or not Christ, men will choose.

    The dialogue continues with a young white man of today who is looking for who he is, for his identity, but who fears to look for it in the direction of Christ, because Christianity seems subordinate to Judaism, which makes Christians inferior. Yet he cannot believe that Christ is lesser than the Old Testament.
    I have learned that Noah was not Jєωιѕн! Then when did Gentiles become different from Jєωs?
    With Abraham, around 2000 B.C. Adam and Eve were created by God around 4000 B.C. For 1000 years mankind so degenerated that around 3000 B.C. Noah was raised by God to save mankind from the Flood, necessary to give mankind another start with only eight souls on the Ark. After another 1000 years men were again corrupt, but this time God picked out Abraham to form a race of men (the future Jєωs) who by being set apart from the corruption of the rest of men (the future Gentiles) would be fit to provide another 2000 years later the human background of the Saviour or Messiah of all men, Jesus Christ. Thus the Jєωs were from Abraham to Christ the special People of God by race, to serve in future all mankind, but when the Messiah came and made clear that God’s own People would be no longer by race but by faith, then the Jєωs out of hurt pride turned against God, killed His Messiah and became the special people of Satan.
    Then were the Jєωs the origin of Christianity?
    Christianity is part human, part divine. The divine part came, and comes, entirely from the Holy Trinity, God, and through the God-man, Second Person of the Holy Trinity, Jesus Christ. It is only the human part, Mary, Joseph, 12 Apostles, etc., that came from among the Jєωs, to whom all Christians owe a huge debt.
    Then is Christianity a duping of the Gentiles by the Jєωs?
    Not at all, and it never has been, because God gave to the Jєωs as His human instruments, His Truth and salvation to give to the Gentiles. The Jєωs largely dropped faith in Christ soon after – mystery of iniquity, pride – but the Gentiles picked up the ball and ran with it all the way to Vatican II (1962–1965) when, essentially, they too dropped Christianity – mystery of iniquity, foretold in Scripture (Lk. XXI, 24).
    Then is the New Testament still Jєωιѕн brainwork?
    Yes, but only in the very insignificant sense, that to tell Jєωs and Gentiles at the beginning of Christianity the great new truths of salvation, as in the Epistles of St Paul, God used the human brains of Jєωs. But soon after those beginnings, it was Gentiles who took over, and from then on, few Jєωs told those truths.
    Jacob was the favoured son of Isaac, Esau the unfavoured son. Jєωs call Christians Esau? Are they right to consider that Christians are unfavoured in comparison with them selves in the eyes of God?
    Not at all, it is the other way round. Read Romans IX, 6–9. Esau is the figure of the unfavoured Jєωs because they largely rejected and reject His Son, whereas Jacob figures the favoured Christians who accepted and accept His Son. St Paul wrestled with the confusion in the minds of his listeners over this vexed question of Jєωs and Gentiles in three major Epistles: Galatians, Romans and Hebrews. His teaching is the Word of God, Scripture, basically clear and absolutely authoritative. Read those Epistles.
    Are the Jєωs right that Gentiles are stupid?
    Certainly, when the Gentiles abandon Christ, and then the Jєωs can easily dominate them, like today. But when the Gentiles are faithful to Christ, which means they are then faithful to God and to the Truth, then neither Jєωs nor Communists can deceive them, and that is when true civilisation flourishes and many more souls are saved, like in the Middle Ages.
    Kyrie eleison.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - White Identity II (no. 709)
    « Reply #1 on: February 13, 2021, 06:59:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Are the Jҽωs right that Gentiles are stupid?
    Certainly, when the Gentiles abandon Christ, and then the Jҽωs can easily dominate them, like today. But when the Gentiles are faithful to Christ, which means they are then faithful to God and to the Truth, then neither Jҽωs nor Communists can deceive them, and that is when true civilisation flourishes and many more souls are saved, like in the Middle Ages.
    Kyrie eleison.

    Very good EC, especially the last paragraph above.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - White Identity II (no. 709)
    « Reply #2 on: February 13, 2021, 01:26:15 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    Are the Jєωs right that Gentiles are stupid ?
    Certainly, when the Gentiles abandon Christ, and then the Jєωs can easily dominate them, like today. But when the Gentiles are faithful to Christ, which means they are then faithful to God and to the Truth, then neither Jєωs nor Communists can deceive them, and that is when true civilisation flourishes and many more souls are saved, like in the Middle Ages.

    Very good EC, especially the last paragraph above.
    Yes, the last part sounds identical to  what I've posted many times:


    Quote
    Until the peoples of Latin America realize that their wealth is in the Faith, and they return TO LIVE as Catholics, they will continue on the same path of poverty, immorality, illegitimate births, abortions, and crime.

    Theodore Roosevelt when he paid a visit to South America at the turn of the 20th century said: “While these countries remain Catholic,” he said, “we will not be able to dominate them.”

    Put another way, as long as the people are fallen away Catholics, CINO’s, Protestants, pagans, athiests, and Marxists, they can be easily dominated. As is the case today.
    Outside of the Catholic Faith, and what little remains of the Catholic culture in Latin America, I see little to be proud of. Without the Faith, Latin America is just another Africa.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - White Identity II (no. 709)
    « Reply #3 on: February 13, 2021, 02:31:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Very good EC, especially the last paragraph above.

    Yes, the last part sounds identical to  what I've posted many times:

    The situation in Latin America is very sad. Unlike the U.S, they once had the Catholic Faith. But it's the same everywhere, really. Former Catholics nations aren't really Catholic anymore.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29