They changed it back about 12-13 years ago to "for many". You gotta keep up, man.
I realized the New Church had changed the words at their consecration of the wine with "for many," but thought like Incredulous that its use would be spotty.
To update - this morning, while doing other things, I put on the local Novus Ordo live tv Mass to see how it was handled at this venue. I had muted the volume, but kept checking the screen, and unmuted it at their consecration. The priest did say "for many," reading everything from a missal laying in front of him.
Speculation was that this "change back" happened, because the New Church knows it thereby removes the cause of complaint that Trads or purists had about how they'd tampered with the wine formula. And it could be safely done because at this point, there were no more "real" priests that may cause real Transubstantiation, due to how the Sacrament of Holy Orders and the Episcopal consecration had been tampered with. They'd also gotten all the use they could out of "for all," as far as their ecuмenist goals were concerned.
Between the New Mass abuses of Quo Primum, and how the Church has condemned Modernism as a heresy - plus a multitude of other factors - it seems almost preposterous that traditional priests or bishops are still not seeing the Modernists' New Mass in any of its forms as an illegal sacrilege, and thereby telling their people to stay away from it. The only Mass allowed in the Roman Rite is the Tridentine Latin Mass.
"I am only the Pope. Who am I to touch the Canon?" - Pius IX