Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)  (Read 11840 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 2Vermont

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11528
  • Reputation: +6477/-1195
  • Gender: Female
Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
« Reply #90 on: November 30, 2022, 01:30:58 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Why are you asking that? Everyone is entitled to anonymity, if they want it.
    With a duplicate account?  Um, no.  That would be......dishonest.  Of course, de Lugo can always just answer the question honestly.

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6791
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #91 on: November 30, 2022, 01:31:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Why don't you all find a priest and get the email chain. lol

    If you provide an address for the email chain, I might just do that. 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6791
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #92 on: November 30, 2022, 01:32:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • With a duplicate account?  Um, no.  That would be......dishonest.

    So you are sure that it's a duplicate account? If he were a sedevacantist, would you care? Probably not. 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6477/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #93 on: November 30, 2022, 01:33:55 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • So you are sure that it's a duplicate account? If he were a sedevacantist, would you care? Probably not.
    No, I don't know.  That's why I asked.  I'm not liking the witch hunt here.  Calling MOTS a liar. Would you be okay with it if MOTS wasn't a sedevacantist?  Probably not. ;-)

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6791
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #94 on: November 30, 2022, 01:35:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No, I don't know.  That's why OI asked.  I'm not liking the witch hunt here.  Would you be okay with it if he wasn't a sedevacantist?  Probably not. ;-)

    It seems to really bother you that De Lugo is challenging MiracleOfTheSun, who is, I presume, a sedevacantist. 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6477/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #95 on: November 30, 2022, 01:37:27 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yep, it is bothering me.  Something is off about the challenge as well. DeLugo's admission that he has information makes me go hmmmm.

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 817
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #96 on: November 30, 2022, 01:42:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • If you provide an address for the email chain, I might just do that.

    "I might just do that."
    Yeah, it sounds like you really want to know (not).  I could but given the propensity of this group for calling me a liar on numerous occasions, while not even understanding the basic terminology first, I'll refrain because I fear it would be posted in spite.

    All ye bashers, he is available and it is up to you to find him.  He is ex-SSPX and lives in the Americas.  

    Good luck and cheers.

    Still waiting for de Lugo to 'expose' me, I think.  


    :popcorn:

    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4122
    • Reputation: +2431/-528
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #97 on: November 30, 2022, 01:43:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "Probably because they've been asking you who these priests are for two pages..."
    Who said anything about 'priests'???  This is and has been about 1 priest the entire time.  Another non-reading complainer. 
    .

    Because you said:

    Quote
    why aren't any of the accusers here bashing me tied into email chains with certain priests so they can be educated






    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 817
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #98 on: November 30, 2022, 01:46:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • .

    Because you said:

    Of course, because there are priests out there doing circuits but specifically to this thread in particular, we have only been talking about 1 priest.

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 817
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #99 on: November 30, 2022, 01:55:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Something is off about the challenge as well. DeLugo's admission that he has information makes me go hmmmm.

    Exactly.  Just 'expose' me already.  

    I'm actually getting full due to all of this popcorn.  No lunch today...


    :popcorn:

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6791
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #100 on: November 30, 2022, 02:16:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Exactly.  Just 'expose' me already. 

    I'm actually getting full due to all of this popcorn.  No lunch today...


    :popcorn:

    Sorry to break it to you, but it's not really all about you. It's about what you have asserted, with no evidence at all. Sedevacantists like to make it all about personalities, so as to distract from the real subject. 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 817
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #101 on: November 30, 2022, 02:28:22 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • Sorry to break it to you, but it's not really all about you. It's about what you have asserted, with no evidence at all. Sedevacantists like to make it all about personalities, so as to distract from the real subject.

    "Sorry to break it to you, but it's not really all about you."
    Please show me where I said it was about me.  I assume you'll find it in the same thread where I was supposed to have stated 'half have left'?

    "It's about what you have asserted, with no evidence at all."
    Welcome to CathInfo, where a priest asks that his emails don't get posted publicly, and I respect that by not publishing them, and people seemingly too lazy to do their own research then bash others.  

    :popcorn:

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 817
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #102 on: November 30, 2022, 02:34:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • De Lugo, brother, bud, amigo - 

    I am coming clean - I NEED YOU TO EXPOSE ME SO I CAN SLEEP AT NIGHT. 

    :popcorn:

    Offline de Lugo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 563
    • Reputation: +421/-74
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #103 on: November 30, 2022, 02:42:26 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Exactly.  Just 'expose' me already. 

    I'm actually getting full due to all of this popcorn.  No lunch today...


    :popcorn:

    Monsieur-

    You have made an unsubstantiated claim, which I am challenging.

    The bottom line is that you cannot substantiate anything you have said, which suffices for me to rest my case, until/unless you can provide any evidence.
    Noblesse oblige.

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 817
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #104 on: November 30, 2022, 02:46:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Monsieur-

    You have made an unsubstantiated claim, which I am challenging.

    The bottom line is that you cannot substantiate anything you have said, which suffices for me to rest my case, until/unless you can provide any evidence.

    I am 'innocent' until you can prove your assertion that I am a liar.  Until then, please, cordially go away and wrongfully accuse someone else.  Thanks in advance, bud.