Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)  (Read 11848 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MiracleOfTheSun

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 818
  • Reputation: +352/-142
  • Gender: Male
Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
« Reply #75 on: November 30, 2022, 12:51:31 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • The liar hides again.

    Do you sense I am about to expose you?

    Buddy, Friend, Amigo - I can only say this in all charity, but you really have no idea what you're talking about.  If you actually have the ability to 'expose' me then that would be through access to the email.  And if that were the case, you know, and agree, I'm telling the Truth.  

    Funny stuff here on CathInfo.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6477/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #76 on: November 30, 2022, 12:54:22 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • What's with the witchhunt here de Lugo?  If I had an email from a specific priest I wouldn't share his name either.  

    How about you share your thoughts on the OP instead?


    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6791
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #77 on: November 30, 2022, 12:56:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What's with the witchhunt here de Lugo?  If I had an email from a specific priest I wouldn't share his name either. 

    How about you share your thoughts on the OP instead?

    Because to assert a claim as MiracleOfTheSun has done, it can't really be believed without evidence. And that has not been provided. 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 818
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #78 on: November 30, 2022, 12:56:34 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Can you also please explain why faithful would be leaving an FSSPX priest's Mass for not condemning Msgr. Williamson (who's not part of the FSSPX)?

    That makes no sense.

    Are you starting to panic a little?

    Who said anything about the priest belonging to the SSPX???

    Friends, puhleeze read the threads you comment on.  Especially when you accuse someone wrongfully.

    No panic here.  Just cooking up a fresh batch of the good stuff...

    :popcorn:

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 818
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #79 on: November 30, 2022, 01:04:52 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Because to assert a claim as MiracleOfTheSun has done, it can't really be believed without evidence. And that has not been provided.

    Meg, please don't be offended but you dissed me a few times for not answering your question when, in fact, you didn't actually understand what a Mass circuit was.  Now I'm being accused of making 'a claim... without evidence'.  

    Why would I lie, for one?  Another question is, why aren't any of the accusers here bashing me tied into email chains with certain priests so they can be educated about this stuff firsthand???

    :popcorn:


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6477/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #80 on: November 30, 2022, 01:07:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Because to assert a claim as MiracleOfTheSun has done, it can't really be believed without evidence. And that has not been provided.
    It is interesting that Matthew didn't require proof from him.  Perhaps it's not as unbelievable as you think.

    Offline de Lugo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 563
    • Reputation: +421/-74
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #81 on: November 30, 2022, 01:07:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Buddy, Friend, Amigo - I can only say this in all charity, but you really have no idea what you're talking about.  If you actually have the ability to 'expose' me then that would be through access to the email.  And if that were the case, you know, and agree, I'm telling the Truth. 

    Funny stuff here on CathInfo.

    Au contraire. 

    I am completely aware of the story (the facts of which you are twisting to bolster your position).

    It is for this reason you will not name the priest or venues (i.e., You can pretend it is some other priest at some other venue you speak of).

    You are not an honourable man.
    Noblesse oblige.

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 818
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #82 on: November 30, 2022, 01:09:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Au contraire. 

    I am completely aware of the story (the facts of which you are twisting to bolster your position).

    It is for this reason you will not name the priest or venues (i.e., You can pretend it is some other priest at some other venue you speak of).

    You are not an honourable man.

    Then why don't you post the Truth???  C'mon, man.


    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6791
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #83 on: November 30, 2022, 01:11:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Then why don't you post the Truth???  C'mon, man.

    Why don't you do so? You brought it up first. 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline de Lugo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 563
    • Reputation: +421/-74
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #84 on: November 30, 2022, 01:14:11 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Then why don't you post the Truth???  C'mon, man.

    The burden is upon you to substantiate your lies (impossible): You made a public statement, and I'm challenging you to back it up or shut up.

    You claim faithful previously allied to Msgr. Williamson are leaving this anonymous (yet publicly known) priest and his Messe circuit, because he's aligned with Msgr. Williamson, and they're upset with Msgr. Williamson's recent comments on new Messe miracles and grace.

    Yet you're unable to provide the name of the priest serving this Messe circuit, or even what venues comprise this circuit (despite the fact that this would all be public knowledge), and pretend to require authority to declare what -if it were true- would already be very public knowledge.

    You'll forgive me for not believing you.
    Noblesse oblige.

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 818
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #85 on: November 30, 2022, 01:19:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • The burden is upon you to substantiate your lies (impossible). 

    You claim faithful previously allied to Msgr. Williamson are leaving this priest's Mass circuit, because they're upset with his recent comments on new Messe miracles and grace.

    Yet you're unable to provide the name of the priest serving this Mass circuit, or even what venues comprise this circuit (despite the fact that this would all be public knowledge), and pretend to require authority to declare what -if it were true- would already be very public knowledge.

    You'll forgive me for not believing you.

    I'll forgive you for many things but culpable ignorance, I believe, is on you.  

    You have your chance to shut me down and expose me as a liar (as you said earlier) and I'm waiting.  Seize the day, bud.

    Shout it from the rooftops, expose me, and I'll bring out the sack cloth.  Otherwise, please stop being so offensive and annoying and speaking on things of which you have zero knowledge or insight.

    Cheers.


    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4123
    • Reputation: +2431/-528
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #86 on: November 30, 2022, 01:21:51 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Another question is, why aren't any of the accusers here bashing me tied into email chains with certain priests so they can be educated about this stuff firsthand???
    .

    Probably because they've been asking you who these priests are for two pages now and you refuse to tell them?

    What a troll.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6477/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #87 on: November 30, 2022, 01:22:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • de Lugo, are you Sean Johnson?

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6791
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #88 on: November 30, 2022, 01:27:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • de Lugo, are you Sean Johnson?

    Why are you asking that? Everyone is entitled to anonymity, if they want it. 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 818
    • Reputation: +352/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Eleison Comments - Questions Ensuing Part 1 (no. 802)
    « Reply #89 on: November 30, 2022, 01:28:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • .

    Probably because they've been asking you who these priests are for two pages now and you refuse to tell them?

    What a troll.

    "Probably because they've been asking you who these priests are for two pages..."
    Who said anything about 'priests'???  This is and has been about 1 priest the entire time.  Another non-reading complainer.  lol

    Why don't you all find a priest and get the email chain. lol

    He is stationed in the Americas.