And this is exactly what the Novus Ordite would tell us.  Bishop Williamson's line of thinking regarding NO "miracles" is dangerous and from what you reported in the other thread, I suspect that a number of Resistance folks are seeing it as dangerous as well.

Dangerous to whom, and why?

Still not seeing how it's dangerous or to whom. Maybe....... the biggest danger is to the sedevacantists.

Well, I can only speak for one sedevacantist - myself - and it doesn't impose a danger on me whatsoever.

1) It poses no threat to me but to Catholics the world over it has absolutely destroyed their faith.  I would say that means it's dangerous to others.  Tim Staples, the mainstream apologist, released a study a few years ago which showed that only 5% of New Ordites believe in the Real Presence.  That means 95% of New Ordites are objectively Protestants.  That would also mean the Bastard Mass is a vehicle of destruction.

Sorry for the length, starting with point 2 -

2) Initially, as far as I know, it began with the statement he made to the woman who asked him at a conference if it was ok to go.  While he acknowledged it was bad, he also said it was ok 'if it nourishes your faith'.  I gave him the benefit of the doubt - it was a public conference, point blank questions, internet goes everywhere instantly - but thereafter I attended another conference in the backwoods of Oregon and he was asked if he stood by the statement.  For effect, he slammed his hand down on the table and said, "Absolutely."  That was the beginning of the end of my time in the Resistance.

For point 1 -

There are so many doctrinal issues with the Bastard Missae it's tough to know where to begin.  Essentially, why give the green light to something when you know it rejects the Sacrifice of Calvary, and was designed by Protestants, Liberals and Freemasons, in exchange for a Protestant happy meal?  I have a brother with a family who is staunch/conservative Ordites and +Williamson's statement completely vindicates what they're doing.

If he's not doing it for New Ordites, or the Resistance, and the SSPX is already on board with Rome anyway, then it feels like the correct answer is 'sedevacantists'? 

If that's the case, he'll be preaching to an empty church for many days to come as sedes are concerned with Doctrine and not feelings such as, 'you should go if you think it nourishes your faith'.  But, yeah, I have no idea why he'd make any positive statements for the vehicle that has basically destroyed the Catholic faith in less than fifty years.

Sorry for the length, starting with point 2 -

2) Initially, as far as I know, it began with the statement he made to the woman who asked him at a conference if it was ok to go.  While he acknowledged it was bad, he also said it was ok 'if it nourishes your faith'.  I gave him the benefit of the doubt - it was a public conference, point blank questions, internet goes everywhere instantly - but thereafter I attended another conference in the backwoods of Oregon and he was asked if he stood by the statement.  For effect, he slammed his hand down on the table and said, "Absolutely."  That was the beginning of the end of my time in the Resistance.

For point 1 -

There are so many doctrinal issues with the Bastard Missae it's tough to know where to begin.  Essentially, why give the green light to something when you know it rejects the Sacrifice of Calvary, and was designed by Protestants, Liberals and Freemasons, in exchange for a Protestant happy meal?  I have a brother with a family who is staunch/conservative Ordites and +Williamson's statement completely vindicates what they're doing.