Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The danger of schism  (Read 3912 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geremia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4149
  • Reputation: +1264/-272
  • Gender: Male
    • St. Isidore e-book library
Re: The danger of schism
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2018, 12:35:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Rumor has it that Bp. Fellay either doesn’t want to be re-elected or would turn down a nomination if asked. Who knows?
    Who are the likely "papabili"?
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co


    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The danger of schism
    « Reply #16 on: January 24, 2018, 02:35:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The rumour about bishop fellay possibly resigning is a lie.

    He will be there for life.

    Mark my words.
    Eclipses neither prove nor disprove the flat earth.

    "As for whether or not I work for NASA, I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what that could possibly have to do with anything" Neil Obstat, 08-03-2017


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10132
    • Reputation: +5296/-917
    • Gender: Female
    Re: The danger of schism
    « Reply #17 on: January 24, 2018, 04:08:45 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • And how does that logic apply to Novus Ordo Watch? They are sedevacvantists, yet they have built a whole "apostolate" on "caring" what the Conciliar Church thinks.
    Caring what the Conciliar Church "authority" thinks/does/says is completely different than caring what that "authority" thinks of them.  NOW absolutely does not care about the latter.
    Revenge not yourselves, my dearly beloved; but give place unto wrath, for it is written: Revenge is mine, I will repay, saith the Lord. (Romans 12:19)

    Offline Wessex

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1311
    • Reputation: +1953/-361
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The danger of schism
    « Reply #18 on: January 25, 2018, 05:54:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Of course, disaffection has given rise to many alternatives to the mainstream status quo. None-Catholics and the children of the revolution would say the world is littered with autonomous varieties and deriviatives of Christianity and such fragmentation ceases to be surprising. The Society would hint about the dangers of schism never wanting to be just one of the numerous many. Yet the fact is a half century of independence may be just dandy and if Rome gives it some approval more the better. The passage of time where hardened ideological differences can be quietly eroded has played a big part in the Society's original mission (though it lacked clarity) being discarded and talk of schism is for internal purposes in order to keep the flock ring-fenced. And this last point will show exactly how like every other separate body the Society has become. Who cares who runs the outfit in future? The Swiss banker psychology has take over and the balance sheet rules the day. 

    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The danger of schism
    « Reply #19 on: January 25, 2018, 08:25:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This turning small communities into some kind of ghetto's is a derogatory name tagging. They did this around the time of Vatican II. I know because i'm old enough to have lived through it. This was a tactic used by Modernists to make catholic laity think they were somehow less than their non-Catholic neighbor. They needed to drop their defenses and join the rest of the world,"modernize ". Their tactic worked for the most part. So Pius X Leadership wants to use the same playbook or parts of it.The Fight goes on. Prayer and Sacrifice are the remedy's, pray The Archbishop Lefevre intercedes for the good of The Society.