The article says it is a new official position for the SSX to deem a Conciliar marriage morally good.
And, with this new position, any priests or faithful who do not comply are schismatic.
Is this not what has the October uproar in France was all about? The French saw the sellout coming.
Now it is here: SSPXers who do not comply to Msgr. Fellay's marriage jurisdiction edicts are immoral.
Disobeying Msgr. Fellay, is the state or quality of being immoral; wickedness,badness, evil, vileness, corruption, dishonesty, dishonorableness...etc.
Do you get it now ?
One of the things that always disgusted me was when ecclesia dei would remarry sspx couples who left the sspx. Basically the ecclesia dei considering sspx marriages invalid was so rediculous to me it seemed just like nasty politics. And, if the sspx heads down that path, that will be very bad. Given the neosspx ecclesiology, them simply having a NO notary you could call it is really not the big deal. But, for them to say it is immoral to do contrary is not what I like to hear. But, they have been implying that for a long time with many other criticisms and condemnations of the resistance. So, it is not really new. Still, nothing I read in this literature is explicitly saying that neosspx considers resistance marriages immoral. So, don't jump the gun, it is not a healthy practice.